RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Search Categories Forum list Register Log in
About RetroFed
About this forum

Everything related to the #GDPR is discussed here. This is the first and only community specifically for GDPR topics which is decentralized and outside of walled-gardens. #EDPB recommendations and guidance can and should also be discussed here.

For the moment, chatter on the similar California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) could be discussed at least until the volume of messages compels us to split it into a separate community.

1 members · 42 topics · 71 posts

RetroFed

Welcome to the nostalgia-filled piefed instance of yesteryear.

Open Registration with Application questionnaire.

If you have a question or comment you can post in !meta@retrofed.com or message @DosDude@retrofed.com or @Die4Ever@retrofed.com

In case of downtime and/or emergency, we will post updates on @DosDude@mastodon.social

Some rules we try to uphold:

  • Be civil. Bigotry is not welcome. This includes (but is not limited to): transphobia, queerphobia, racism, ageism and ableism. We do not promote hate.
  • Communities need to be Retro or Retro-adjacent.
  • Please don't upload pornographic content. (use an external image host for that)
72 registered users
Administrators: DosDude, Die4Ever
Visit retrofed.com
General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) ⚖ !gdpr@sopuli.xyz
Moderators: freedomPusher
New Topic RetroFed Forum Forum Index » General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) ⚖
Page 1 of 2   Goto page 1, 2 Last »
 Topics  Replies  Author  Score  Last Post 
Google, Meta, and Verizon are partners for a self-regulating “privacy” non-profit org (the BBB!) for cross border EU-US data transfers (web.archive.org) 0 daveyOsborn 22 »
[c/d] DAB radio by Karcher has a Wi-Fi SSID that cannot be disabled.. wtf? Seems shitty for infosec and also likely violates the GDPR. 17 daveyOsborn 0 »
French National Broadcaster (TF1) Not respecting GDPR. Translated "To watch the catalogue of live programs, you must accept [all] cookies or subscribe to premium". (media.piefed.zip) 7 FundMECFS 6 »
Trump just accidentally sabotaged the US’s standing as “adequate” (LOL) w.r.t EU→US data transfers. Good news for Europeans! (www.matheson.com) 0 freedomPusher 7 »
Guardian not Respecting GDPR? (media.piefed.zip) 37 FundMECFS 59 »
Can an EU citizen file a complaint with the Information Commissioner’s Office of the United Kingdom? 2 Voxel 8 »
Dataministeriet – A podcast about data protection and privacy (dataministeriet.com) 0 BornAgainIn1939 3 »
KYC is becoming: know your customer’s customers. FSFE’s payment provider canceled them w/out notice for not sharing info about donors (yes, in a GDPR region) (fsfe.org) 4 activistPnk 16 »
Germany has 17 DPAs, each covering a region. Plus there is a federal DPA, apparently. Where do complaints go on cross-border situations? (www.datenschutzkonferenz-online.de) 1 ciferecaNinjo 3 »
Google criticizes Europe's plan to adopt free software -- this abuses a GDPR hole that FOSS compensates for (sopuli.xyz) 0 freedomPusher 2 »
“Invite a friend” schemes found to violate the GDPR. Nice. Now what about when a friend uploads their address book to a shitty ad surveillance corp? (gdprhub.eu) 0 debanqued 1 »
🇧🇪Belgium: “public bodies are exempt from GDPR fines” (web.archive.org) 0 freedomPusher 2 »
How the rise of teleworking generates more personal data -- and how Art.15 can exploit that for extra justice 0 freedomPusher 1 »
(FI) Banks are becoming like Britney Spears’ dad -- monitoring transaction details (itemised grocery puchases) and denying service. If true, there is a serious GDPR art.5c problem in Europe. (lemmy.sdf.org) 0 activistPnk 2 »
💰 cash tracking has immunity from the GDPR b/c banknote serial numbers are “technical data” not “personal data” (slrpnk.net) 2 activistPnk 3 »
Does anyone here have an actual personal GDPR enforcement success story? 0 freedomPusher 1 »
Ireland basically tossed out GDPR Art.18 and 21, or something 1 debanqued 1 »
(Europe) email self hosters can use the GDPR fight big mail hosters who block you 0 debanqued 1 »
Do data processors have any accountability for discriminatory use of automated individual decision making under Art.22? 0 debanqued 1 »
Should you CC your Art.77 complaint to a data controller when the DPA is a deadbeat agency, as a legal strategy? 0 debanqued 1 »
The GDPR gives us a right to complain *for free*. But we get what we pay for. So we need a right to a free appeal, no? Or do we have that already? 0 debanqued 1 »
(Ireland) CCTVs in restrooms. Seriously? (www.dataprotection.ie) 0 freedomPusher 1 »
French DPA: forcing SNCF customers to specify “Mr.” or “Mrs.” when buying a train ticket does not violate data minimisation... (www.vbb.com) 0 ciferecaNinjo 1 »
Microsoft: solve our visual CAPTCHA if you want to submit a GDPR request (www.microsoft.com) 0 debanqued 1 »
GDPR tactic: “forum shopping”, by choosing a data controller’s HQ.. does this work? 0 ciferecaNinjo 1 »
New Topic Page 1 of 2   Goto page 1, 2 Last »

About this forum

Everything related to the #GDPR is discussed here. This is the first and only community specifically for GDPR topics which is decentralized and outside of walled-gardens. #EDPB recommendations and guidance can and should also be discussed here.

For the moment, chatter on the similar California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) could be discussed at least until the volume of messages compels us to split it into a separate community.

1 members · 42 topics · 71 posts
Powered by PieFed · PieBB frontend · All times are Europe/Amsterdam