Yes, I do. And even worse: I like it. 😈

Of all the people who have incredibly strong opinions about not-so-incredibly important things, the virulently anti-systemd crowd are among the ones that baffle me the most.

Nothing like a lewd late afternoon meme to stir up my anxiety and dysphoria. 😭

Now, to the matter at hand. systemd is great. I only moved away from it because being handed all the automation on a silver platter was hampering my Linux learning. Everything had preconfigured .service files and [...]ctl commands.

There are many legitimate complaints. Bundling a bunch of services into a single binary goes completely against Unix philosophy. Systemd changing from text to binary logs is my pet peeve.

Copying how Windows does things isn't necessarily the best.

I do as well and honestly after looking into the effort required to switch I’m not gonna. Altho my Linux doesn’t boot rn soooo… xD

Sigmamd

stop kill make kiss

be nice to him, he's baffled

It's popular to hate systemd. Just as it's popular to hate PHP. It makes people feel like they're part of an "elite group" that are above these things. Most of the time, people can't even explain why they hate it. Just ask someone why he hates systemd and in 95% of all cases, you won't get a straight answer, except, of course: "It ViOlAtEs LiNuX pHiLoSoPhY" yes timmy and how does that affect you while browsing and playing games, because that's all you do on your PC.

I'm not saying that there are no reasons to dislike systemd for some people. There might be a handful of them who genuinely dislike it and have justified reasons for it. However, an overwhelming majority of the people that hate it don't even have a fucking clue what it is, let alone why it's dislikeable, they just read on twitter or reddit that it sucks. And that's it. It's a bit like a big streamer saying: "Game XYZ is shit" and a majority of that streamers following will think its shit.

It's not people disliking it that makes no sense to me; everyone has their opinions.

I just can't imagine having the level of anger displayed by some of the most vocal of the anti-systemd crowd.

There's also a few cases of feature and scope creep, including the infamous systemd-resolved.
Systemd, your job is to launch services, manage logs, and do timers and relaunches on a service crash. DNS is out of scope, leave that to existing services.

There's no way he'd get laid with a keyboard like that.

The other day on a thread here about "people who use other init systems, why?" and i wrote about my experience with systemd and git downvoted for mysterious reasons. Other people that did the same as me also got their downvote sixpacks. And now they want to make it seem like it's just the people that hate systemd the annoying ones...

If your favorite thing is being ruined and you can't stop it, I can understand frustration being displayed as anger.

It's the same when Windows users get angry at things like OneDrive. It's forced on them and they don't want to have to work around removing it like people having to work around how Gnome is integrated into systemd.

If your favorite thing is being ruined and you can't stop it, I can understand frustration being displayed as anger.

That's the joy of open source though: you can stop it. You are free to use another init system, fork projects, etc. With Windows, you can't do any of that. Since it's closed source, workarounds that may be temporary are all you can do.

Richard P. Gabriel, in his essay “The Rise of Worse-is-Better,” expounds on this theme (see Appendix A). His thesis is that the Unix design philosophy requires that all design decisions err on the side of implementation simplicity, and not on the side of correctness, consistency, or completeness. He calls this the “Worse Is Better” philosophy and shows how it yields programs that are technically inferior to programs designed where correctness and consistency are paramount, but that are evolutionarily superior because they port more easily. Just like a virus.

The highest achievement of the Unix-aesthetic is to have a command that does precisely one function, and does it well (...) This philosophy, in the hands of amateurs, leads to inexplicably mind-numbing botches like the existence of two programs, “head” and “tail,” which print the first part or the last part of a file, depending. Even though their operations are duals of one another, “head” and “tail” are different programs, written by different authors, and take different options!

From The Unix Hater's Handbook

(I like Linux, but it's not all sunshine and rainbows)

There's legitimate criticism of systemd and I do understand that people can hate it.

Anyways, systemd is so nice to use. Even more with nixos.

The effort required is to install a distro without it. That's it. Some without it are even quite popular, like MX Linux.

Clarification: I don't care either way about systemd, just saying, it requires no effort to avoid.

What systemd binary is the worst offender, in your opinion?

That's the joy of open source though: you can stop it.

Not really. Unless you are prepared to devote your life to changing the source code to what you want, you have to accept it. And because you forked you are no longer downstream and will have to spend the rest of your life keeping up with patches.

It's not much different than Windows. You could write a OneDrive uninstaller but you will have to spend the rest of your life with patches every time MS updates and breaks your uninstaller.

It's not the binary. It's that the logs it writes are in binary so can't be read without a program.

Logind. Right after udev.

I'm trying to use alpine Linux on a VM. The amount of things depending on systemd is extreme. It's a pain in the ass not having it.

Orr... I'm shitty at Linux.

the virulently anti-systemd crowd are among the ones that baffle me the most.

Tell me you need to learn more about scope creep, Unix and system design using different words.

I mean we are literally on a couple of open source solutions communicating using an open protocol probably using some sort of open OS.

https://nosystemd.org/ is a thing. I dont have particularly strong opinions on the matter.

You don't need to do it alone. In fact, people can come by, fix some things, then go about life. Or donate money instead of resources. If you have used lemmy/piefed/mastodon/peertube in the past, theres a tiny bit of my code in there that makes things just a tiny bit better. Thats not a brag or anything, its just that multiple people can contribute.

But I hear the frustrations. There is a certain mindset you have to have, hopeful you and others can build something....or with enough hatred to build out of spite. Sometimes thats hard to do with everything else in life. Sometimes the best thing to do is to accept and move on. Or go looking for new solutions without maintenance.

your favorite thing is being ruined and you can't stop it,

Hardly a 'favourite thing'; it's like making a water slide out of a river : Wantonly wrecking something simple, effective and usable for this mishmash isn't ruining something sacred as much as it is destroying something for no reason to dramatically create something lesser the world didn't need. Except with more hype, payola, ageism, strong-arm adoption and cult worship.

Why do so many people think it's a good thing??

That's the joy of open source though: you can stop it. You are free to use another init system, fork projects

That and a big company looking to manufacture a perceived advantage by aggreasively pushing their shit into the mainstream - good fit to be taken over by IBM - who can bankroll the slapdash dev and bully ISVs, and you're set.

There are too many people who use downvote to disagree with cogent and well written points.

I try to only downvote if something is obviously trolling, in bad taste, or wildly stupid.

It attracts a lot of silent disagreement that's for sure.

By far my most controversial post was negative about systemd, while posts on Palestine, anarchy, etc. received no negative attention at all.

Yeah I meant the effort required to change a already running distro to use something other than systemd seems too daunting. ofc if you have the luxury to reinstall a fresh distro its very easy

Arch, Fedora, Debian/Ubuntu all use systemd. SteamOS/CachyOS are based off Arch. Bazzite is Fedora-based.

If you use Linux for gaming, you are not going to have a good time avoiding systemd. It's certainly true that some distributions don't use it, but their market share is limited.

It seems dismissive to ignore the trends and investment in the ecosystem going towards systemd based distributions.

You know it's not a single binary, right ? Systemd is a bunch of different, mostly single usage, mostly optional, binaries. As far as Unix philosophy goes, Systemd is definitely following the principles, which is not the case for the Kernel for instance.

As for the binary logs, I used to hate it, but then, not having to manually parse logs for filtering is really nice.

I do have my issues with Systemd, but it not following the Unix philosophy is not one of them.

If you like a distro and they switch to systemd, there's not a lot you can do if you aren't up to forking the whole distro. I feel like too many people in open source forget that most people have lives outside of Linux.

As previously mentioned, I do not have a dog in this fight. I do not personally care if my distros has it or doesn't have it. A lot of distros use systemd because they like it. If you don't like systemd, you can use something else. If systemd starts to get really bad for some reason, less people will use it. That is the circle of life, and why open source works as a self correcting economy.

Also, like... I do prefer to be up to date for gaming & optimizations from gaming focused distros. But if I am being honest, the single digit percent increases are not that noticeable vs something like MX Linux.

As someone who designs systems as part of his job, "it violates Linux philosophy" is a perfectly valid reason to hate something as critical and low level as an init system.

I think "hate" is a strong word, mind, but following consistent design patterns and constraining scope matters. The problem is that it's one of those things that doesn't tend to matter until shit hits the fan.

The scope creep exponentially raises the efforts needed to properly test, troubleshoot, secure, and just generally work with the project code. The unique design creates rough edges for integrations with other pre-existing systems and tools, while also raising the effort needed for troubleshooting when something goes wrong.

There's also the whole "Chesterton's Fence" aspect to a lot of it, where the project runner's overall attitude has been dismissive of existing conventions and separation of functionality.

There's a lot of perfectly valid reasons to dislike it. That said, I think full on hate is extreme for an aspect of the overall Linux "system" and "user experience" that most users never interact with. Like having an opinion on the order your BIOS handles things in.

Shepherd gang. Pretty sure only one distro uses it, but i'd love to know if i'm wrong.

"This program sucks because it doesn't come with the world's most confusing GUI and doesn't do a trillion things"

If you ask this person what "technically inferior" actually means you'd probably get a different answer every day.

I understand that you personally are fine with it, but this is apparently a trigger for me, so please accept my apology in advance for offering commentary.

• if you don't like it, you can use something else:

This is only really true for desktop PC hobbyists. SteamOS is responsible for a huge spike of Linux usage recently and that is Systemd-only. it's true that you can install something else but it'll be a significantly worse user experience. This is the case for basically any handheld Linux device, and all corporate investment is going to systemd based distros.

• if systemd starts to get bad, less people will use it:

The alternatives are less polished and switching distros is a relatively costly proposition if you are not a hobbyist (in terms of opportunity cost and time spent without a functional computer). Handheld devices such as the steam deck are much less flexible as well.

Linux users: come join the community! It's free, safe, and accessible!

Also Linux users: you fucking swine? You do WHAT?!

Like just be happy more people are joining the community and contributing. Shesh

The head and tail programs also do completely different things. What differences in options do they have?

That head/tail thing is kind of a goofy argument. For one thing they aren't duals; tail is naturally more complex because the end of a file often changes and the application can optionally keep showing you the new output. Also, the fact that they're separate applications in the first place is arguably better than the a one-application approach, which would always require a command line switch to select between outputting the start or end of a file. And finally, while I guess this could vary between implementations of head and tail, mine has identical switches for all the common options.

Is joke.

Idk, i mean there's Artix. I've used Void for like 2 years and gaming was fine.

Your options are limited significantly if you want to avoid it, but yes, there are options. I use a steam deck primarily and while I can re install the OS, it's a significant amount of fiddling for a worse experience.

My issue with systemd is not that it's 'hard to use' or anything. My issue is that it's getting harder to avoid as time goes on.

Yeah that's true. On the desktop since i was already using more DIY-type distros it's not that difficult to avoid it, but with a more specialized usecase like the steam deck it's hard to find something that mimicks the SteamOS experience without using systemd, or at least there's not an OOTB experience distro for that as far as i know. I'm still using the stock SteamOS on my deck for that reason, it doesn't feel worth it to replace, especially since i only use mine to game and don't tinker with it like my desktop.

A lot of people suddenly talking about NixOS lately but literally the only news I've seen about it in a while was that the maintainers are Slopping with AI Code.

Yeah I've seen him, too.

make: *** No rule to make target 'kiss'. Stop.

/>

I don't particularly hate systemd, but when they said they are considering incorporating age verification stuff I switched to void.