| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» Funny
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next Last » |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
cm0002
lemmings.world
cm0002@lemmings.world Joined: 2025-10-18 |
|
||
| 1345 Original | |||
|
Anarki_
lemmy.blahaj.zone
Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2023-07-03 |
Money laundering? |
||
| 42 | |||
|
Damionsipher
lemmy.world
Damionsipher@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-21 |
And yet this degenerate asshole is worth ~$150M |
||
| 16 | |||
|
Kellenved
sh.itjust.works
Kellenved@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2024-12-16 |
What an indictment of our society that this fuck ass ever had that much money and now has more |
||
| 132 | |||
|
NullPointerException
lemmy.ca
NullPointerException@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-10-20 |
Nah, it’s genius. A fantastic way to laundry money. It’s like buying paintings but you don’t even need to pay someone to appraise it or a good painter with some sort of good technique. |
||
| 82 | |||
|
Imgonnatrythis
sh.itjust.works
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-09-23 |
How much is it worth in Trumpcoin? |
||
| 9 | |||
Th4tGuyII
fedia.io
Th4tGuyII@fedia.ioJoined: 2024-06-11 |
Money laundering?
Certainly my guess. No way he was actually dumb enough to pay over £600,000 just for an image someone could "steal" 1:1 just by copying and pasting. It was almost certainly a way to move money somewhere while retaining plausible deniability, just like with all the other |
||
| 18 | |||
|
notsosure
sh.itjust.works
notsosure@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2025-06-10 |
It wasn’t stupid SOMEBODY made a shitload of money - his money. |
||
| 10 | |||
BeigeAgenda
lemmy.ca
BeigeAgenda@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-06-28 |
How much is it worth in Trumpcoin?
The computer can't handle a number that small, it will just round it to 0. |
||
| 6 | |||
dohpaz42
lemmy.world
dohpaz42@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-01 |
Nah, it’s genius. A fantastic way to laundry money. It’s like buying paintings but you don’t even need to pay someone to appraise it or a good painter with some sort of good technique.
Yeah, but do paintings typically lose almost all of their value? I thought the idea was that the value should either stay the same or go up. Either way, in this case, it couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy. |
||
| 28 | |||
|
akilou
sh.itjust.works
akilou@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-03 |
Why is it even worth $155? |
||
| 8 | |||
Dem Bosain
midwest.social
DemBoSain@midwest.socialJoined: 2023-08-11 |
Sorry, that's not worth $155. |
||
| 11 | |||
|
ceenote
lemmy.world
ceenote@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-16 |
Certainly my guess. No way he was actually dumb enough to pay over £600,000 just for an image someone could "steal" 1:1 just by copying and pasting. It was almost certainly a way to move money somewhere while retaining plausible deniability, just like with all the other scams projects he's been part of over the years
... Have you seen this guy talk? He's pretty fuckin dumb. |
||
| 14 | |||
|
Davel23
fedia.io
Davel23@fedia.io Joined: 2024-03-16 |
What I want to know is how it's still worth $155? |
||
| 7 | |||
BigFig
lemmy.world
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-09 |
Yeah, but do paintings typically lose almost all of their value? I thought the idea was that the value should either stay the same or go up. Either way, in this case, it couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.
The point here is say you are in business with X party but it's illegal. X party can buy an nft worth nothing or generate one. You buy the NFT for the amount of your bill with X party. You've now technically not paid them for whatever illegal thing, instead you bought an nft from them. You could also break this down into multiple NFTs, buying 100 $100 NFTs from various "owners" that don't link back to X party through shell companies, and you've now paid them $10,000 "for pictures of chimps". NFTs only exist for money laundering and illicit transfers. Once they've been transferred their value no longer matters, the business has been done. |
||
| 52 | |||
|
schnokobaer
feddit.org
schnokobaer@feddit.org Joined: 2024-06-28 |
That NFT is worth $0 |
||
| 19 | |||
|
Klear
quokk.au
Klear@quokk.au Joined: 2025-08-14 |
Certainly my guess. No way he was actually dumb enough to pay over £600,000 just for an image someone could "steal" 1:1 just by copying and pasting. It was almost certainly a way to move money somewhere while retaining plausible deniability, just like with all the other scams projects he's been part of over the years
I think it's the exact opposite - no money actually changed hands. They just sell worthless crap to each other to make it look valuable to suckers. |
||
| 9 | |||
|
Khanzarate
lemmy.world
Khanzarate@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-04 |
Yeah, but do paintings typically lose almost all of their value? I thought the idea was that the value should either stay the same or go up. Either way, in this case, it couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.
For Logan Paul, yes, he wanted it to go up. But if this painting was laundering at work, the important part is that the seller can point to this transaction as "real". The IRS or the FBI might be looking into his sudden gains of half a million dollars, but when they do, they find that he sold Logan Paul half a million dollars of art. The NFT part makes it incredibly easy to generate said art. Before NFTs, rich people would mark up paintings, and those had to go up in value, because they would buy them at 100,000$ and sell them for 200,000$, so the government would see 100,000$ of profit, but the next guy with the painting, he'd have to sell it for 300,000, claiming 100,000$ in profit, and the next guy, 400,000$, you get the idea. NFTs can lose value in a way real art isnt allowed to because anyone can claim that's the price, and after the sale, they can be discarded as trash, essentially. New ones can be made in bulk for no effort, and its alright to sell 1000 NFTs at 100$ each, because you can just keep making them and "selling" them and no one has to care about their value in the same way because they're mass producible without that crashing the market. |
||
| 24 | |||
|
jagermo
feddit.org
jagermo@feddit.org Joined: 2024-06-23 |
Nah, it’s genius. A fantastic way to laundry money. It’s like buying paintings but you don’t even need to pay someone to appraise it or a good painter with some sort of good technique.
Buy it, insure it, get "hacked" and then get your clean money from the insurance. |
||
| 1 | |||
PhoenixDog
lemmy.world
PhoenixDog@lemmy.worldJoined: 2026-01-14 |
Certainly my guess. No way he was actually dumb enough to pay over £600,000 just for an image someone could "steal" 1:1 just by copying and pasting. It was almost certainly a way to move money somewhere while retaining plausible deniability, just like with all the other scams projects he's been part of over the years
Let me stop you right there... |
||
| 20 | |||
|
jaybone
lemmy.zip
jaybone@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-02-08 |
Is this the guy who got his jaw busted, and now wants to fight a football player? |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Kaput
lemmy.world
Kaput@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-01-13 |
Who owns it now? I suppose thé value change when its sold. Any wat to sée thé past grades? |
||
| 3 | |||
dohpaz42
lemmy.world
dohpaz42@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-01 |
For Logan Paul, yes, he wanted it to go up. But if this painting was laundering at work, the important part is that the seller can point to this transaction as "real". The IRS or the FBI might be looking into his sudden gains of half a million dollars, but when they do, they find that he sold Logan Paul half a million dollars of art. The NFT part makes it incredibly easy to generate said art. B...
Thank you for that thoughtful response. That all makes sense. |
||
| 6 | |||
|
Town
lemmy.zip
Town@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-03-03 |
What an indictment of our society that this fuck ass ever had that much money and now has more
His net worth is over 2 billion now. It's revolting. |
||
| 27 | |||
|
tackleberry
thelemmy.club
tackleberry@thelemmy.club Joined: 2026-01-30 |
NFT? you mean money laundering? |
||
| 10 | |||
|
Sc00ter
lemmy.zip
Sc00ter@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-06-14 |
Certainly my guess. No way he was actually dumb enough to pay over £600,000 just for an image someone could "steal" 1:1 just by copying and pasting. It was almost certainly a way to move money somewhere while retaining plausible deniability, just like with all the other scams projects he's been part of over the years
I mean, this is the same guy who bought a pokemon card for 5 million... but he just turned an 11MM profit on that |
||
| 5 | |||
Schwim Dandy
piefed.zip
schwim@piefed.zipJoined: 2025-06-15 |
It was content. He likely made more off of the clowns that made him a millionaire than it cost. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
Assassassin
lemmy.dbzer0.com
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2025-09-26 |
I kinda wish NFTs were still somewhat popular, they were such an effective indicator for the dumbest people alive. |
||
| 24 | |||
|
PrimeMinisterKeyes
leminal.space
PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space Joined: 2025-06-06 |
NFT? you mean money laundering?
New Fraud Template |
||
| 7 | |||
dditty
lemmy.dbzer0.com
dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2025-06-13 |
His net worth is over 2 billion now. It's revolting.
Where are you seeing such a high figure? This article from 2025 says $150 million. I know he has Celsius and wrestling but 2 billion seems like BS |
||
| 36 | |||
samus12345
sh.itjust.works
samus12345@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-07-03 |
How the hell is it even worth $155? |
||
| 42 | |||
|
plyth
feddit.org
plyth@feddit.org Joined: 2025-05-11 |
The computer can't handle a number that small, it will just round it to 0.
Do you mean to say that Trump coins are very valuable? |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Bleys
lemmy.world
Bleys@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-12 |
no one else going to point out that Logan Paul is somehow not the worst person in that picture |
||
| 41 | |||
I Cast Fist
programming.dev
ICastFist@programming.devJoined: 2023-06-22 |
How the hell is it even worth $155?
He's really good at scamming people |
||
| 11 | |||
|
Bytemeister
lemmy.world
Bytemeister@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-29 |
That NFT is worth $0
Claim it as a loss on your taxes since it is an investment. Now it is "worth" whatever taxes were paid on 635,000 dollars of income, which I would guess is in the 100K - 300k range. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Ms. ArmoredThirteen
lemmy.zip
ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip Joined: 2024-12-08 |
The point here is say you are in business with X party but it's illegal. X party can buy an nft worth nothing or generate one. You buy the NFT for the amount of your bill with X party. You've now technically not paid them for whatever illegal thing, instead you bought an nft from them. You could also break this down into multiple NFTs, buying 100 $100 NFTs from various "owners" that don't link ...
And at least to some degree scamming people even if that's not the main focus. I know a few people that got full on scammed by it |
||
| 11 | |||
Widdershins
lemmy.world
Widdershins@lemmy.worldJoined: 2025-04-04 |
Is this the guy who got his jaw busted, and now wants to fight a football player?
Is this the same guy who filmed the dead bodies in Aokigahara forest? |
||
| 3 | |||
BeigeAgenda
lemmy.ca
BeigeAgenda@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-06-28 |
Do you mean to say that Trump coins are very valuable?
I was thinking that both values are very close to zero, but that would mean they use a third currency as intermediate, and as I remember that's not how things work. So in conclusion my comment needs some more work. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
taiyang
lemmy.world
taiyang@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-08 |
Where are you seeing such a high figure? This article from 2025 says $150 million. I know he has Celsius and wrestling but 2 billion seems like BS
I also saw $150 million, which is more than he deserves but it's mostly because of ownership. Wealth snowballs so even if you make terrible life decisions after the initial investments, you usually come out with even more money. |
||
| 20 | |||
GalacticSushi
lemmy.blahaj.zone
GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zoneJoined: 2025-10-18 |
no one else going to point out that Logan Paul is somehow not the worst person in that picture
For anyone wondering, she's a conservative influencer who worked with BlazeTV, Toilet Paper USA, contributed opinion pieces to RT and, unsurprisingly, has ties to the Russian government. |
||
| 44 | |||
|
treesquid
lemmy.world
treesquid@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-02 |
Then he made it all back on a Pokemon card, right? |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Steve
startrek.website
Steve@startrek.website Joined: 2023-10-08 |
For Logan Paul, yes, he wanted it to go up. But if this painting was laundering at work, the important part is that the seller can point to this transaction as "real". The IRS or the FBI might be looking into his sudden gains of half a million dollars, but when they do, they find that he sold Logan Paul half a million dollars of art. The NFT part makes it incredibly easy to generate said art. B...
Real art can simply be destroyed if you want |
||
| 2 | |||
CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]
lemmy.dbzer0.com
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2024-04-09 |
I kinda wish NFTs were still somewhat popular, they were such an effective indicator for the dumbest people alive.
They still are. Though MAGA red hats are a really close second. |
||
| 10 | |||
texture
lemmy.world
texture@lemmy.worldJoined: 2025-12-19 |
oh throw up its lauren chen |
||
| 9 | |||
|
cholesterol
lemmy.world
cholesterol@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-21 |
Isn't it worth exactly what the highest bidder will pay? Where would the $155 number come from? Seems like an NFT famously owned by Logan Paul would sell for more than $155 anyway. Not saying he'd make a profit here... |
||
| 18 | |||
|
Khanzarate
lemmy.world
Khanzarate@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-04 |
Real art can simply be destroyed if you want
You can also just never sell it, but buying it doesn't help you launder your own ill-gotten money, just other people's. The issue is creating it. It's not that big an issue, but NFTs are way more efficient. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
SkyezOpen
lemmy.world
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-03 |
For anyone wondering, she's a conservative influencer who worked with BlazeTV, Toilet Paper USA, contributed opinion pieces to RT and, unsurprisingly, has ties to the Russian government.
More specifically, she and her husband founded tenet media, who ACTUALLY FOR REALS laundered Russian money to shitheads like Tim pool and Dave rubin. |
||
| 23 | |||
|
Jakeroxs
sh.itjust.works
Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-03 |
NFTs only exist for money laundering and illicit transfers And at least to some degree scamming people even if that's not the main focus. I know a few people that got full on scammed by it
Cash only exists for money laundering and illicit transfers and scamming |
||
| 1 | |||
merc
sh.itjust.works
merc@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-09 |
Claim it as a loss on your taxes since it is an investment. Now it is "worth" whatever taxes were paid on 635,000 dollars of income, which I would guess is in the 100K - 300k range.
That doesn't help that he actually paid $635,000 for it and now it's worthless. It's as if he took half a million dollars and just set it on fire. Being able to claim a loss on his taxes, if that's allowed (which I'm pretty sure it isn't), doesn't really help with that. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
ColeSloth
discuss.tchncs.de
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2023-08-18 |
Terrible investment. That was probably like 2 months of his income. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
Bytemeister
lemmy.world
Bytemeister@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-29 |
That doesn't help that he actually paid $635,000 for it and now it's worthless. It's as if he took half a million dollars and just set it on fire. Being able to claim a loss on his taxes, if that's allowed (which I'm pretty sure it isn't), doesn't really help with that.
Or... He either didn't actually pay that money... Or the money went to someone or something he wanted to give 635,000 dollars to already, and writing it off on his taxes is an additional side benefit. |
||
| 5 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 1 of 3
Goto page
1, 2, 3
Next
Last »
Back to top |