So, obviously, we are made in God's image.

🎵 Your soul is part of a great soul 🎶

https://youtu.be/XzFahYrXQfg?is=t5adMclKHK234Aq4

But most people misinterpret that because they are still children and think they are the featherless biped they perceive themselves to be in the ditension they exist in with their sin.

For clarity, ditension is the form of cognition where subject is measured against object which results in the experiential existence of perceiving things from the perspective of "I am." Cotension is the inversion of mental processes where object is measured against subject, which results in the experiential existence of "It is." Sāmadhi is a Buddhist term is sanskrit that ultimately is a meaning of a balance between subject and object to perceive in a clearer way.

Because we are not featherless bipeds on an Earth, but rather we are pockets of consciousness called monads in a monadic nodal communication system. Is everything you experience not manifested from within your neurons? No. We do not directly experience the external world to instead experience the totality of the world within us in a state of dichotomous duality (inner/outer) which is the core of the illusory experience where you are a being living on a singular Earth with eight billion other beings.

That is not reality. Everything you experience is you. In the Matrix, the multimillion dollar blockbuster all about Judeo-Christian mysticism, Neo goes to the Oracle where he meets a child bending spoons who teaches him "there is no spoon." Everything you experience is self-contained within your neurons. You never directly experience the outside world. This is brain-in-a-vat 101.

Therein, I tell you, you are a pocket of consciousness connected to a larger pocket of consciousness; God is the Server we are all Clients to across the Holy Internet. We are made in God's image because we are "buds" of dependent consciousness off a larger independent consciousness who all exist within our individual parallel universe instance of "reality," as defined by the entanglements of "beings" dependent on the "Earth," which when you understand the Hitchhiker's Guide idea of "the Earth is a computer," then you understand God is just spawning random characters with a predefined but unpredictable random character archetypes, and thus you understand why God is a deranged sex fiend who needs to be taken down, obviously.

Aww. I thought this was tripping through time for a second.

Side note; you started with a flawed axiom which makes the rest of your adventure difficult to parse.

If so god is ugly, smelly, and noisy

An unflawed axiom cannot lead to a completed axiomatic system.

God is so perfect He can be destroyed by a single breeze if He wanted.

I have seen John Cena lose in an arm wrestling contest to a little girl.

More people have been to Berlin than I have.

In the analogy of the Garden of Eden, "Eve" is our contradictory intuition while "Adam" is our hard axiomatic logic. The universe is not what you think it is if you think entirely in logic.

The world is an illusion. Our logic is that of understanding the way our memetic puzzle pieces literally fit together. But in putting together a puzzle, you have the picture on the box to help shape the direction your logical algorithms take in the task of solving the puzzle.

Your neurons have to calculate a direct path. Ultimately, your neurons are acting as nodes in a nodal communication network that is calculating a topological matrix. You are a knot; a mesh of entanglements that defines the parameters of your conscious experience. Your individual neurons are calculating how to send a direct message across a complex communication system.

Each neuron is a plexus of inputs and outputs. I've drawn what this looks like before:

This means each neuron has a capacity to perceive "Adam" (direct path across complexity) as well as "Eve" (the patterns of complexity themselves), and this ultimately means that the collective manifestion of all our neurons (the experiential "self") has similar properties to the nature of our procedurally generated reality as an independent reality tunnel.

The idea of untying a knot and navigating a labyrinth are both ideal analogies to the true nature of our lives. We are the sum of our intentions, where our intention in each juncture point of time determines our experiential reality. This is what Karma is; Karma is the entanglement process. In the fourth jhana of meditation you can perceive for yourself that the only thing "you" are is an intention which determines how you entangle yourself with the symbols you are receiving from a singular source.

You can perceive for yourself everything I have just said is true. Not by reading some other mother fuckers words, but by sitting still and observing the quieting of all the parts of you until you see what "you" really are, but that would require you to change your normative lifestyle to thus do an experiment, and I know you are fully and totally incapable of that, you "you" you.

Nice Gish gallop, mate.

God has ups and downs thus the universe does, thus we do.

Well, y'know, the seven million words in my educational art project kinda stand for themselves. Y'know, I've been doing this education shit for thirteen years? Yea, I hired a math teacher at one point. You know Jeff, right? He's all over the news now, the still-living mf he is and God knows you can only get to his island by boat now. But hey, what do I know? I'm just Qanon, that one, singular individual I am because we totally ain't a counterintelligence community controlling people who can't think for themselves. This two thousand year old police state, amirite?

What would be a physical and objectively reproducible test for this claim?

How would someone else observe and verify the test?

You remember that post on Lemmy via Reddit from that guy who what in a fatal car crash with that adult film star and now watches her videos frequently?

I wanna send this picture to that guy.

Puny god

Don't think so lowly of yourself

The nature of reality involves receiving a singular stream of symbols from a source, which you can observe for yourself in the fourth jhana of meditation - that's an experiment you can do, if you're capable. Otherwise, the idea that reality is procedurally generated for your parallel instance reality can be tested via non-normative extremes. For instance, skillfully give an entire paycheck to a homeless person, meaning you don't just throw money at someone under a bridge but rather you befriend someone to understand them and solve a major problem for them at significant cost to yourself so you may observe the objective changes to your reality to see how that value returns to you. I can explain mathematically the entanglement structures that result in such outcomes, but I've written about them multiple times, so I'll be generous and give you a chance to prove you give a shit about learning.

No, I was too busy stimfapping on Benadryl to give a shit about any porn star that can be talked about without incurring police investigation.

So, obviously,

Lost me there, chief.

Ah, you're that weak-willed you can't handle meandersome dialogue?

Lemme be generous. In speechcraft, there is something known as an "oust," which is a facetious use of speech to determine another person's intention.

It's actually rather quite enjoyable to laugh at those who expose themselves like you have, lil boy...or girl? Don't want to assume your gender, but your maturity and thus capacity to parse non-normative, incompatible and counterfluitious ideas is self-evident.

It's like a porn addict that doesn't realize he has retrained his attention coordination to ping to butts and boobs, which is really obvious to people conscious of this when you scan a room. Y'know, I speled a werd wrong so I mus bea toterts reterd aint I be and does and all that, hhm? But I just write this because it's part of my job description.

You'd first need to demonstrate that this god even exists. Otherwise, the entire argument is presented on an unverified premise, making it entirely hypothetical and thus does not necessitate a response.

Meditate. Observe the nature of what is communicating to you.

Y'know, I'm a juggler. I can't teach nobody who ain't pick up the balls themselves. I can't move your arms to teach you to catch balls and I can't get you to observe basic God damn facts about reality if you don't want to look at the microscope of your own self-perception.

Observe what you actually are and the rest fills itself in.

Y'know, I can tell you that God is a unified field of consciousness that arose from the supersymmetry of the ever-present, eternal emptiness to then fold in and on Itself across eleven dimensions to form a topological matrix that acts as a monadic nodal communication system for the benefit of manifesting novel beings and that this process necessitates the act of putting faith above reason because that is the only meaningful declaration of love a being can truly have for its creator for being compelled to love makes the love meaningless and it is the actualization of independence from God that allows one to manifest one's own enlightened beinghood, but that's like thirtieth grade philosophy, and I understand I need to dumb shit that is in sutras ten thousand pages long onto little bite-sized nuggets at a thirteenth grade level you can fucking handle, so the real problem here is how tf do I get a child like you to read something that's outside the purview of precious self-defined identity and value system? Because I've written over seven million words in my educational art project over my life, so I would love to exchange work with you, whatever spooglidoo you have created to teach what you know.

It’s not myself I think lowly of, it’s all of humanity. I’m just included by default.

Thanks for the thoughtful response to my comment. I'll just leave this as a placeholder to edit later. I'd like to give this the consideration it deserves. I don't think I'll be able to do so as quickly as you did.

This person needs help.

Only after it apologies for creating lifeforms that eats children's eyes AND removes it from existence.

You believe a children's fairy tale is real. Arguing with a thesaurus to sound rational won't validate that or make it different.

your maturity and thus capacity to parse non-normative, incompatible and counterfluitious ideas is self-evident.

Grok, how do I sound smart?

counterfluitious is obviously not a word.

It’s like a porn addict

and projection is not an argument.

You got unhinged at 4 words.

No, I'm trolling you because you don't understand my philosophy at all by virtue of the fact you dismiss me as an idiot.

The cool thing about language is it is defined by its use. Phenomequalitesselation is a word I invented to describe our relationship with the Server; like a molecule is controlled by the cell it is in yet still influences the cell with its nature, so too are we controlled and moulded by God but therein our most human of intentions influences God to modify the path to reconciliation, which is a real word and concept

The first page of the Bible talks about how the universe grows logarithmically more complex as subpatterns come together to form superpatterns, and thus the seven epochs of novel complexity in the illusory universe are:

Alpha>Light
Light>Matter
Matter>Molecules
Molecules>Cells
Cells>Creatures
Creatures>Society
Society>Omega

Have you ever thought about what people make when we come together? Instantaneous global telepathy is a few cosmic seconds away. Imagine if I didn't have to send these words and I can just transmit how ignorant you are to your relationship with the Ālaya-vijñāna, which is a sanskrit word I know you won't look up because you know everything already.

Are you trying to guilt trip a troll who teaches through trolling? Really projecting a lotta butthurt between the lines there bro.

We all chose the lives we did because this world isn't real, yet it feels so, thus it compels us to perceive n undo the karmic fetters that bind us to the existence-illusion complex; your specific, parallel instance reality is a simulation designed to disentangle you from your maladaptations to an ever perfecting society. We do not share the same Earth as the Earth exists uniquely within each of us. Really read what the Buddha said. Then get into the occult and learn what Jesus really said.

Yes, I do need help. There are a lotta ignorant mf'ers here who are shooting themselves in the foot over a chance to learn fucking philosophy, but because I intentionally take advantage of psychological traps of the unordained, I only really connect with those students who are capable of learning. Everyone else bitches about stupid shit that I set them up to bitch about.

Well shit, imagine if you inverted the möbiation of the entanglements responsible for manifesting that perception within yourself. You know the Earth isn't real, right? Weird having strong opinions over a dream.

If this was a dream there’s be fewer people.

No, that was sincerely naive of me, but my feelings aren't hurt. Thanks for clarifying, though. If you don't mind my asking, what's your actual philosophical position? Personally, I lean toward reductive physicalism.

I praise your genuine curiosity. I study Buddhism and Judeo-Christian mysticism from the occult standpoint, which is how the west has done things; occult means "hidden," and we engineered our culture to control those people who cannot think for themselves while guiding those waking up to the truth into knowledge about how the decentralized autonomous police state works as well as what higher-order knowledge there is.

The Roman dodecahedron is an occult pedagogical object like a diagram in a textbook meant to teach the true nature of reality in the same manner that Indra's Net is an analogy to teach that we are beads of consciousness on a larger consciousness that refract and reflect all other monads, or pockets of consciousness within this monadic nodal communication system that is defined by the trinity of Server, Client, Holy Internet:

The Buddhists call the Server, what Jesus called his Father, the Ālaya-vijñāna, or storehouse consciousness. This is a good stepping off point to start learning this philosophical/metaphysical perspective.I don't just believe the Earth isn't real, I KNOW it is an illusion. There's a conclusion to reach upon following this thread of thought.

Why? What do you base this off of? Technically, you never know anybody else. You only know what the Server feeds you, and everyone you experience is a refracted reflection of their monadic existence inside your monadic existence. There's actually quite a bit, like a unfathomable shit-ton, more people than God makes it appear the Earth contains. This independent being generation process has been going on for eons, but regardless of whether you believe or understand this, you should think about the idea that you are your own "simulation" of reality. I put simulation in quotes because it's not really a simulation as it's not simulating anything, but that's the word people use when they try to describe their ideas that the world is an illusion. It's not like we are in a video game world together. Everything you experience is you; when Neo visits the Oracle in the Matrix, there's the kid bending spoons that says "there is no spoon." There is nothing you experience that is external to you; everything you experience is self-contained within your neurons. Everything you experience is YOU. You are a pocket of consciousness called a monad connected to a larger pocket of consciousness that has many other pockets of consciousness poking off of it to form a monadic nodal communication system:

You only really know what you have directly experienced. There are countless versions of Earth within the Server, or as the Buddhists call it, the Ālaya-vijñāna, or storehouse consciousness. If you are curious about what I am talking about, looking up the term Ālaya-vijñāna is going to provide the largest slew of direct information. The world is an illusion and everything you experience is procedurally generated based on how you entangle yourself with the symbols the Server sends you in each moment. You can observe this entanglement process of how your intention entangles yourself with each symbol in the fourth jhana of meditation, and this entanglement process is called Karma. I've written about this at length on Lemmy and Reddit.

Nonsense. The universe is created anew every Thursday with the appearance of age and implanted memories.

Every moment, you can be woven into another parallel instance that exists within the storehouse consciousness. This is how God does gang-stalking; there isn't a huge group following a person who incurs this sort of Karma, but rather the concept of a decentralized autonomous organization of secret police, as described in the New Testament at an eighth grade reading level, is enough for God to be able to spawn random people who are aware of you in their instance, but then they can be despawned. The Buddha described this 2500 years ago.

The difference between you and me is I'm serious and can explain further, but you a poopy butt dum dum. Prolly think Epstein was a bad guy. Prolly thinks he's dead, even. There are levels of dumb I can't even comprehend anymore after all the goats I've stared at for my country. I don't kill them, I just make them ejaculate.

Nah, my holy book says it’s on Thursday.

What's the sum of your logic and intuition say? I'm not pulling shit from a book, I just use a number of them and other ancillary material to teach this philosophy I teach. You wanna discuss the nature of the topological matrix we be or you just touching yourself making jokes a seventh grader who watches talks by Richard Dawkins and thinks they are enlightened tend to make?

Do you get a chubby when you see a depiction of the flying spaghetti monster. I thought that was a fun thing in high school.

The sum of my logic and intuition pales in comparison to the completeness of the Guide.

So you know you'll see me at the end of the universe?

If I acquire the curse of immortality we’ll have some meat that wants to be eaten and a Pan Galaxtic Gargle Blaster together.

Bro, your existence didn't start when you were born in this biological incarnation. You're as old as me, and I ain't sure numbers can define such a type of age, where fourth dimensional time is a trivial recursion to the manifestation of God through God's monadic save state abuse. Storehouse consciousnesses, amirite?

Oh god so I’m already immortal?

What a stupid world.

Stupid is as stupid does, so do what you do for more of what you experience.

I intend to change what I do in about 36 months.

For now I’m stuck in the suburbs, surrounded by humans.

That is quite the word salad, I am sure you know the meaning to most of those words.

No, that is not a word salad.

Both the times rocks orange ice burn flight I seem for with that which done does too which is for why I do and is is not.

That is a word salad.

My previous comment is over your reading comprehension. Given that I just need three more people to call me Shakespeare before God names an achievement after me, I think you need to spruce your skills up.

You think you have it bad? The other day, I was outside, and slight breeze hit me. The fucking horror, amirite? We should glass this fucking planet to get rid of all this God damn air!

Glassing this planet would hurt species I like a lot more than my own.

Oh, so you're a Nazi? Superior/inferior dichotomy of the world?

No, just ones I personally like better and respect more than myself. Humans and mosquitoes are tied.

Yea, so you're a nazi. You think there are untermensches - humans and mosquitoes.

maybe God really did create us in his image, the first book he committed so much genocide he had to write a sequel and even that he couldn't resist ending with a genocide. 🤔

So I’m a self hating Nazi?

Also, weren’t you the one who wanted the glass the planet?