Do not engage. Top half said cute, bottom half says attack.

i can't make it sense

Ai ?

Me on any given Saturday night

Behold human!!!
“The heck am I beholding?!”
Just…dude…BEHOLD!

no >:(

I'm having fun figuring out how kitty returns to the upright position. I think: raises limbs to normal kitty angle, then twists body to bring all limbs to one side, then manages to put limbs underneath body and push up against the floor.

kitties have little hidden springs all over. one bloinggggg and they pop right up in nanoseconds.

Clearly a player of inverted guard; be careful, she might try to leglock you.

Yes.

Yep. I just ran it through a few searches.

Exactly, cats aren't real they're just a computer half lucid apeing

you know those things have an insanely high false-positive rating right? like 70%

What camera did you use? The face looks so uncanny…

I hate this post-LLM world

I'm not saying this pic is necessarily really, however you should put next to zero stock in these "AI detectors".

They’ve been close to 100% accurate by my testing

They’ve been accurate for me.

cool.

how do you test?

Using Al-driven AI-detectors

Send it AI pictures that you know are AI and it is able to determine its AI. Send it photographs that aren’t AI and it determines its not AI.

How else would you test it?

https://youtu.be/hzhgprZ9abI

Timestamp 4:10

I found it in video form. It's not proof of anything but that's the source of the frame.

Unless you use something like synthID verification, stop using these detectors. They are 0% reliable

Yet they all agree with one another other. Funny how that is. If it’s not AI for one, it’s not for all, and vice versa. They’re accurate enough.

ah. want me to tell you your horoscope as well, while we're at it?

Send it pictures that look like AI but you know aren't, send it pictures that don't look like they're made by AI but you know they are.

It's not just yes or no, it's a wider ranging analysis.

Send it photoshopped images

looks perfectly normal once the cat moves and you can see how the anatomy works

When I send it pictures that look like AI, it says it’s AI. And when I send it pictures I know aren’t AI, it says it isn’t.

Your bias is personal it seems. I don’t have these issues.

Embarrassing.

What's wrong? Here's an inverted image of a cat skeleton illustration. You would expect the back joints to bend towards its fore limbs.

I guess people are just not used to see cats from this angle?

at least we agree that you are

Blocked. Go annoy someone else.

your ai slop tools are wrong btw

I hope you can see how that is just confirmation bias and not proof

Physics do not apply to cats. I swear I've seen my cat jump in the air, pause for a split second in midair, then change directions.

they could literally just use he same protocol... which could make them less realiable in some cases really.

https://youtu.be/hzhgprZ9abI?t=4m10s

Probably not ai.

??? That literally just says that it always agrees with you. I am not saying it's always wrong or anything but you can't say it's always right. You cannot only rely on that.

Not like I know how it works but what could it so? Detect some patterns in pixels? AI would be changing anyway and would overcome that eventually. but i don't actually know how it works you're the one using it so you tell me ig.

Besides from detectors like these having been proven to be wrong a lot. You cannot only use your personal experience. As an analogy to see why you should take the experience of others into account. Image someone drives drunk and nwver crashes so they think it's completely safe. (we're not comparing the risks nor stakes here).

Usually, if everyone thinks you are wrong, you are probably wrong, so unless you 100% know the in's and outs of it, why it always in any hypothetical scenario or at least in most it would work... then you probably should check on it. I am bot blaming you or anything, we all have done worse stuff. Still I am guessing that if you're just saying "it works for me all the time" instead of explaining why it would, you probably don't have a technical reason to believe ot would.

Sorry if this was like uhh idk insultive or whatever people say nowindays. also idk how to spell probably.

Oh yeah also this is from a video, someone mentioned that, it's a cool video and actually not too strange of a pose in retrospective, even my dog does similar stuff.

I am not saying it is def not ai, I mean I don't know how good ai vids were in 2025 I just remember that one horrible coke ai ad but idk when that was and idk if the part that wad off was thw video itself or the continuity, cuz stuff like this doesn't realllly need a lot of continuity. it's a cat video compilation.

I didn't see anything about ai in the comments immediately at least but that could be deleted by the creator anyway.

I hate this LLM-post world.

Just put the batteries in and flip it right-side up. Should work as new.

those "detectors" are highly unreliable, but look at it's left paw

You're wrong, someone found the clip and it's very clearly not AI.

idk why everyone is saying ai. I have a cat that does this too when she gets frisky

i..... think your cat is broken.