The Economist: China’s clean-energy revolution will reshape markets and politics

😂If we provide non-MB/FC-approved sources, you’ll dismiss them. If we provide MB/FC-approved sources, you’ll say, “gotcha“ and dismiss them.

Yeah they blocked my comment about how in pre history humans fucking wrecked eco systems pre capitalism lol

FFS look up the history of Easter Island. This is a uniquely human trait either. TREES caused mass extinction too. Species running amok is a problem.

So do you believe humans are, at their core and regardless of system, predisposed to destroy the planet?

Taking this frame of thinking to its inevitable end, you're either going to mow down as many people as a first step towards omnicide or you've given up and you're resigned with the destruction of the world, proving to yourself that if you aren't willing to do something to "improve" things, it must be human nature. This is obviously not me saying to go do an omnicide, but your blackpilled frame of thinking is self-enforcing. If you felt like there was a better solution out there and that socialism was a direction towards less destruction such that generations after us could keep moving towards something better, you'd be able to help build it, but you don't, so you are chained to your doom, determined to chain us with you. The handful of capitalists busy fucking the world thank you for giving up.

capitalism and humanity are a combined problem towards our planet

Oh, no, honey. It is very much a capitalist thing.

The lichen of destruction

The planet literally doesn't care about us in any way. We could nuke every inch of the planet continuously for a decade and the planet will continue to spin and eventually become a lush planet full of life again.

Don't worry about the planet, we are incapable of destroying it in any meaningful way.

oh, yeah, fuck it all. fuck the climate anyway, I guess?

False dichotomy is false.

It isnt obviously the problem until we see a solution working out... We can say it looks like its probably the problem.

Deforestation and the destruction of environments have happened long before capitalism. One could say that the worst parts of human behavior are encapsulated by capitalism, maybe even enhanced by.

In mathematics we use the term "obviously" all the time without empirical evidence. Sometimes because logically it is, sometimes because we want to do a proof by intimidation.

the selfish gene is ruling the party

never speak Tibetan.

Tibetan language remains a core subject in Tibet’s schools, with bilingual education policy in place since the founding of modern schooling in the region. The Tibet Autonomous Region government confirms that over 400 types of Tibetan-Chinese bilingual textbooks have been compiled, and terminology databases covering 12 academic disciplines support Tibetan instruction across subjects. Public signage, government documents, and media in Tibet routinely use both languages. Tibetan is also widely spoken throught the region.

Mandarin is promoted as the national common language because it gives Tibetan speakers practical access to higher education, civil service exams, legal aid, healthcare systems, and economic opportunities beyond local borders. China’s Constitution and the National Common Language Law explicitly protect the right of all ethnic groups to use and develop their own languages while establishing Mandarin as the common language for national communication. In schools across Tibet, both Tibetan and Mandarin courses are offered, and students who wish to pursue Tibetan-language university programs can still take Tibetan language exams organized by the region.

You can criticise things without lies and exaggeration you know.

Responding with facts is predictable, that's quite the compliment thank you.

The PRC is using its socialist economy to dramatically combat climate change and improve green energy.

I wasn't in this thread before this? I sort my feed by new comments. Youre comment came up and I responded to the part I was interested in. What's wrong with that?

I still don't see the issue? You brought up Tibet, I simply responded to it? What is the issue?

So you take issue with the fact that I corrected your lies instead of letting you just regurgitate untrue statements? Also I didn't respond to the rest of it because again I wasn't part of this thread and I don't care about it.

ignores everything else.

So you never learn and continue to be a fucking dumbass? Really smart move.

If you're wrong, you're going to be corrected for it. That's like spouting Flat Earth nonsense at an astrology convention and calling the ones that correct you "predictable." Yes, you probably foresaw people correcting you, but that doesn't mean your claims were correct.

If you look at human history you will mostly see

Mostly? No you do not lol

If you hadn't lied about Tibet I wouldn't have responded as again for the 3rd time I sort by new comments and don't really care about the rest of this thread. What part of this do you not understand? Is it such a great injustice that someone replied to you to correct a lie you told? I genuinely do not see why you're getting so pissy about this.

Comes to communist com. Spouts anti communism. Complains about "piling on" when communists disagree

What? That we won't let you lie without correction? That we have differing interests in topic to discuss and aren't a hivemind? Genuinely you just seem offended that you weren't allowed lie about Tibet.

Oh you're a racist too. I hope you follow your leader soon.

spews racial abuse

Being racist is bad

See? Le epic own

Genuinely what are you doing?

Definitely, reasonable conversation with a racist such as yourself is impossible, but I have time to waste atm so not a big deal.