he lacks the depth, warmth or utility.

If we ate just one techbro the other ones would fall in line pretty quickly

That's just capitalism working as intended.

He's not efficient enough for current construct. Exterminate!

We should just eat them all. They stopped contributing anything of value years ago.

I have no idea why people keep using an innocent man's name to talk about murdering people.

To save the working man, you've got to put him out to pasture

                 Soup us Good Food - Dead Kennedys 

unless you plan to murder the unemployed.

Well, that's precisely what some of the Trump-aligned fascists are suggesting on live television.

He didn't do anything, so saying that you Mangione someone it means you don't do anything with him =]

Idk man, I am really scared of prion diseases.

A good ol' public hanging.

Chatbots aren't the endpoint tho, AGI and ASI are. Imagine a future where we could disseminate custom AIs to teach kids exactly in their unique contexts. Education could be throttled and specialized according to everyone's aptitudes.

And if the people are able to decide what future ASIs work on we could focus on massive healthcare, leading to inevitable healthspan extension. Then the rate at which we have to replace our population (and the associated spending of 20 years reteaching intelligent citizens) would be reduced as a consequence.

AI is just a tool. Tools are never rolled back, at most they're only regulated. Why not make the best of our future with this powerful tool? Just because billionaires are getting the headlines, most of the progress is being done in academia. Maybe AI will even help facilitate reduced wealth inequality.

So don't eat the brains. Those are rotten anyway.

You think he would oppose a massive genocide of 99.9% of humanity if he could get an army of robots to sérve him in his new world?

Think again!

Sam Altman is right. In fact, when you think about it, humans also give off lots of excess energy in the form of body heat, and it is only logical that this energy would be harvested to make AI run more efficiently. AI gives humans so much, it's only fair if they give something back.

/s

He will probably claim to work a gazillion hours a week with an unrivaled efficiency, making him one of the most productive humans on Earth. Because these people are not just sociopaths, they're also completely delusional about their intelligence and true worth, out of money worth.

If you eat one techbro, you consume about 300,000 kcal, which is significantly more energy than it takes to ask chatGPT one question. So who is more energy efficient, AI-atheists? /s

Hey Sam where did chat gpt get that information to plagiarize from?

That assumes the AGI/ASI doesn't have gates keeping it from people.
Sorry you only get the basic model b/c you can't afford it something better.
An open, free, equally accessible AI for everyone no matter what is just not how capitalism works.

I'd prefer composting and growing veggies.

The worst of it is how human existance makes electricity and RAM more expensive for AI. Hard reality check soon.

Why /s

The proper response to dystopian prophecies is not "challenge accepted"!

Applebottom jeans and the boots with fir. Robot raises arm and all the servos go whirr.

How about he replace his role with an llm?

To make it clear that it's sarcasm

Well, they're trying to kill him (Luigi), so that's a valid interpretation.

I don't but the police work for me since I am a billionaire and they can murder the unemployed for me!

Oh good, the Bitcoin argument.

"Sure, Bitcoin wastes a lot of energy, but you know what else wastes energy? The Visa payment network."

Yeah, but Visa handles six quadrispillion transactions per megawatthour, Bitcoin handles two drug purchases. Not the same results, is it?

So yeah, training humans takes a lot of energy. But in the end, you get a coherent, capable and well functioning individual. Spend the same energy on training LLMs and you get a system that'll happily tell you to glue the cheese on pizza or something.

Yeah because nobody drugs with any other method than bitcoin. Clutch those pearls harder while you wash down your leagal and totally not drugs pharmaceutical pills and alcohol.

You're right. I forgot that AI people had that mindset. A dangerous thing to forget, because people like that will literally descend into an ideology that believes you can kill others if they inconvenience you.

LLMs are trained on the sum of human knowledge. So that same exact burden is carried by your "AI".

So a couple of watts per day of energy spent by a human brain compared to the gigawatts it takes to train and run your shitty text prediction engine is not equivalent.

Tech bros deal in false equivalencies. In general they rely on the playbook of logical fallacies. The one they rely on most is the presumption that the technology they're trying to sell is correct by default as if it's a fundamental law of the universe. And that the onus is on others to prove them wrong. Rather than them having to prove its correctness.

They often resort to ad hominem by implying their detractors lack intelligence or they're emotional. This again draws on more logical fallacy that because they deal in technology it means they presume to own the position of being purely objective and correct by default. So anyone who says otherwise is disputing science itself.

In other words they never have to prove the veracity of the technology they're trying to sell because they divert the discourse off topic to frivolous arguments about something else.

You said so ? Now go blow Arab dicks for oil money.

before you get smart

Something he never did, apparently

Take off your rose-colored glasses. The billionaires control the implementation, and they don't care about universal healthcare or education, and certainly not reducing wealth inequality.

Also, LLMs will never evolve into AGI, because they're fundamentally different processes. The human brain has many parts, and the Broca's area is a very small part that cannot generalize its functions to perform the tasks of all the other areas of the brain.

And ASI is pure scifi. Circuits will never be sentient, the best they can ever do is mimic sentiency.

It hit the floor, it made some noise. Robby got low, low, low, low, low, low, low

All he does is talk out his ass and mislead investors. They can certainly perform those functions!

His statement is so deliberately misleading, it's disgusting.

"In the four years that they've been mainstream, our machines haven't consumed as much energy as all of humanity has over millions of years of evolution. Gotcha, naysayers!"

And he has such a punchable face. I don't usually say that, but he does.

Not trying to defend the idiotic argument, but feels like more often than not the human output is not what I would call coherent, capable and well functioning.

with the right funding it could...but where could we get all that money 🤔

it does bro, no worries

I bet we could get a lot of volunteers if the objective is “building a literal Hell for billionaires.”

hanging is too straightforward

you sure any veggies would be able to grow?

Someone on Bluesky pointed out that, even if you ignore the morality of this argument, AI is trained on human content, so if we're going to start examining the human energy cost, we'll have to factor in the cost of every single human whose work was used by ChatGPT on top of the data center costs.

dystopian novel type shit

lmao best comment ever

Sam needs training too.