| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» Microblog Memes
Page 1 of 5 Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 5 Next Last » |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
Will SAVE Act Prevent Married Women from Registering to Vote? Posted on February 28, 2025 Q: Is it true that under the SAVE Act married women will not be able to register to vote if their married name doesn’t match their birth certificate? A: The proposed SAVE Act instructs states to establish a process for people whose legal name doesn’t match their birth certificate to provide additional documents. But voting rights advocates say that married women and others who have changed their names may face difficulty when registering because of the ambiguity in the bill over what documents may be accepted. |
||
| 1163 Original | |||
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
This is from USA Today. This is where political journalism is:
|
||
| 45 | |||
Jeena
piefed.jeena.net
jeena@piefed.jeena.netJoined: 2024-06-11 |
Easy solution, just don't marry anyone with a different last name. |
||
| 167 | |||
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
Easy solution, just don't marry anyone with a different last name.
Hmmm |
||
| 10 | |||
circuitfarmer
lemmy.sdf.org
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orgJoined: 2023-06-13 |
Easy solution, just don't marry anyone with a different last name.
That's how MAGA does marriage, usually |
||
| 240 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
This is from USA Today. This is where political journalism is: Will the SAVE America Act pass the Senate? Odds, predictions The odds of the SAVE America Act passing the Senate and signed into law in 2026 are 12% according to the Polymarket betting odds, and the Kalshi market odds show 13.9% confidence that it will become law.
TBF the betting platforms had higher accuracy than aggregate polls in 2024. |
||
| 27 | |||
|
FlexibleToast
lemmy.world
FlexibleToast@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-03 |
TBF the betting platforms had higher accuracy than aggregate polls in 2024.
I definitely trust the prediction markets more than just about any poll. |
||
| 1 | |||
X
piefed.world
X@piefed.worldJoined: 2025-10-20 |
That's how MAGA does marriage, usually
Might go a long way in explaining those long jaws they frequently have |
||
| 29 | |||
|
sparkles
piefed.zip
sparkles@piefed.zip Joined: 2025-11-23 |
This is from USA Today. This is where political journalism is: Will the SAVE America Act pass the Senate? Odds, predictions The odds of the SAVE America Act passing the Senate and signed into law in 2026 are 12% according to the Polymarket betting odds, and the Kalshi market odds show 13.9% confidence that it will become law.
[deleted]
|
||
| 72 | |||
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
[deleted]
And yet it doesn’t even make the top ten fucked up shit for today. |
||
| 31 | |||
|
minorkeys
lemmy.world
minorkeys@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-07-12 |
They'll go after each demographic whose voting habits favour democrats: Immigrants, women, educated, non-christian, poor, lbgtq+, young, non-white. Whichever ones you belong to, makes you a potential target of voter disenfranchisement. At he same time making it easier for: old, male, white, Christian, wealthy, uneducated, straight, multi-generational American. |
||
| 114 | |||
|
sparkles
piefed.zip
sparkles@piefed.zip Joined: 2025-11-23 |
And yet it doesn’t even make the top ten fucked up shit for today.
[deleted]
|
||
| 11 | |||
|
lonefighter
sh.itjust.works
lonefighter@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2024-03-12 |
If your name doesn't match what's on your birth certificate, look into whether your state allows you to change your birth certificate and do it before it's too late. My name is not my birth name or my married name, I had it legally changed. I got tired of hauling around my birth certificate, marriage certificate, divorce paperwork, and legal name change to show the paper trail that I both was who I was and was no longer legally married. Turns out in my state I just had to send in a notarized form, copies of my paperwork and pay small fee and I got my birth certificate updated to my current name. Now I can "prove" who I am by just showing my birth certificate and ignore the fact that I was married and changed my name. It also made updating my passport easier. Granted, I am not trans, but I did it last year and they had the option to change gender on the form. |
||
| 23 | |||
|
FishFace
piefed.social
FishFace@piefed.social Joined: 2025-10-16 |
TBF the betting platforms had higher accuracy than aggregate polls in 2024.
Betting platforms aggregate the beliefs of the people betting on them, but this means that biases of that group affect the odds. |
||
| 12 | |||
|
kryptonianCodeMonkey
lemmy.world
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-13 |
Easy solution, just don't marry anyone with a different last name.
Found the Kentuckian |
||
| 8 | |||
socsa
piefed.social
socsa@piefed.socialJoined: 2024-08-20 |
Easy solution, just don't marry anyone with a different last name.
Roll tide |
||
| 19 | |||
|
Xenny
lemmy.world
Xenny@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-29 |
So hear me out. Conservatives are more likely to take someone's last name than a liberal couple right? Doesn't this disproportionately disenfranchise Republican women? Could this potentially actually harm the Republican vote? |
||
| 18 | |||
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
So hear me out. Conservatives are more likely to take someone's last name than a liberal couple right? Doesn't this disproportionately disenfranchise Republican women? Could this potentially actually harm the Republican vote?
Yeah. But the hit to potential Democratic voters will make it worth their while. Essentially women would need to provide additional paperwork in order to vote. Republican women have that paperwork, or can get it easier. |
||
| 9 | |||
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
They'll go after each demographic whose voting habits favour democrats: Immigrants, women, educated, non-christian, poor, lbgtq+, young, non-white. Whichever ones you belong to, makes you a potential target of voter disenfranchisement. At he same time making it easier for: old, male, white, Christian, wealthy, uneducated, straight, multi-generational American.
Wait til you hear why they created a “war” on “drugs”! |
||
| 61 | |||
|
kingofras
lemmy.world
kingofras@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-05-13 |
|
||
| 7 | |||
|
UnspecificGravity
piefed.social
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social Joined: 2025-12-03 |
Do the Republicans really think they are going to benefit from a requirement that disenfranchises people who don't have proof of citizenship like: -Women who got married and took their husbands last name Bear in mind that the people who are basically guaranteed to have their documents in order are: -Recently naturalized citizens So your local lesbian coven of naturalized middle aged Latinas. They are going to have zero problem voting. Joe Bob the cousin fucker from Alabama who has never gotten more than 20 miles from his trailer park and doesn't believe in "the gummet", and hasn't had a job that didn't pay cash in his whole life? Yeah, that fucker doesn't have a passport. But hey, at least they are going to stop all the undocumented immigrants who already weren't allowed to register to vote in the first place. This is going to be like how they attacked absentee voting without realizing that the majority of absentees were retirees and the military. |
||
| 37 | |||
|
betterdeadthanreddit
lemmy.world
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-06 |
Easy solution, just don't marry anyone with a different last name.
[Sweet Home Alabama intensifies] |
||
| 30 | |||
magnetosphere
fedia.io
magnetosphere@fedia.ioJoined: 2023-06-30 |
Do the Republicans really think they are going to benefit from a requirement that disenfranchises people who don't have proof of citizenship like: -Women who got married and took their husbands last name -People who keep getting divorced over and over again -People who have never travelled outside the US Bear in mind that the people who are basically guaranteed to have their documents in order ...
Just want to emphasize this hilarious line for anyone who doesn’t feel like reading the entire post. Please carry on. |
||
| 17 | |||
|
Kairos
lemmy.today
LodeMike@lemmy.today Joined: 2023-12-26 |
Do the Republicans really think they are going to benefit from a requirement that disenfranchises people who don't have proof of citizenship like: -Women who got married and took their husbands last name -People who keep getting divorced over and over again -People who have never travelled outside the US Bear in mind that the people who are basically guaranteed to have their documents in order ...
Not usually |
||
| 30 | |||
nocturne
slrpnk.net
nocturne@slrpnk.netJoined: 2025-06-13 |
So hear me out. Conservatives are more likely to take someone's last name than a liberal couple right? Doesn't this disproportionately disenfranchise Republican women? Could this potentially actually harm the Republican vote?
When my wife and I married she only took my last name because her father abandoned her when she was 6 months old, and she wanted to erase that from her identity. |
||
| 13 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
Betting platforms aggregate the beliefs of the people betting on them, but this means that biases of that group affect the odds.
People who receive and respond to polls are also a subset with biases. |
||
| 6 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
I definitely trust the prediction markets more than just about any poll.
IDK about that, but credit where due they aren't a terrible source. |
||
| 3 | |||
RebekahWSD
lemmy.world
RebekahWSD@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-10-19 |
This being on the horizon stopped me from changing my name from my father's to my mother's last name. A shame. She has a much cooler name. |
||
| 6 | |||
|
femtek
lemmy.blahaj.zone
femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2025-07-04 |
So hear me out. Conservatives are more likely to take someone's last name than a liberal couple right? Doesn't this disproportionately disenfranchise Republican women? Could this potentially actually harm the Republican vote?
A lot of states have been banning name changes for trans people, I think this was a dumb attack on trans people. |
||
| 15 | |||
|
chuckleslord
lemmy.world
chuckleslord@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-12 |
I definitely trust the prediction markets more than just about any poll.
Nah, I once made a hundred bucks because they had Doug Jones losing to that pedo. They'd just as fallible as anything else. |
||
| 2 | |||
FenrirIII
lemmy.world
FenrirIII@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-12-05 |
Seems like this won't affect a lot of women in the south. |
||
| -2 | |||
|
FlexibleToast
lemmy.world
FlexibleToast@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-03 |
Nah, I once made a hundred bucks because they had Doug Jones losing to that pedo. They'd just as fallible as anything else.
I mean, nothing is 100%. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Kewlio250
lemmy.zip
Kewlio250@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-11-19 |
Yeah. But the hit to potential Democratic voters will make it worth their while. Essentially women would need to provide additional paperwork in order to vote. Republican women have that paperwork, or can get it easier.
What makes you think Republican women would have an easier time getting that paperwork? As far as I know, the demographics of passport holding Americans skews slightly left, and more left leaning couples would be expected to have kept their maiden names upon marriage. |
||
| 10 | |||
tino_408
lemmy.world
tino_408@lemmy.worldJoined: 2025-11-04 |
They'll go after each demographic whose voting habits favour democrats: Immigrants, women, educated, non-christian, poor, lbgtq+, young, non-white. Whichever ones you belong to, makes you a potential target of voter disenfranchisement. At he same time making it easier for: old, male, white, Christian, wealthy, uneducated, straight, multi-generational American.
As a non white lol why can’t I vote? I’m a legal citizen I will have no issue. I would like to know what rights the whites have over me? |
||
| -12 | |||
|
Serinus
lemmy.world
Serinus@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-14 |
As a non white lol why can’t I vote? I’m a legal citizen I will have no issue. I would like to know what rights the whites have over me?
Rights? Have you been paying attention? They're blatantly and regularly violating the first, second, fourth, and fifth amendments whenever they feel like it. They're absolutely going to have ICE around harassing anyone they think might vote blue, particularly people of color. |
||
| 21 | |||
|
Agent641
lemmy.world
Agent641@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-12 |
They'll go after each demographic whose voting habits favour democrats: Immigrants, women, educated, non-christian, poor, lbgtq+, young, non-white. Whichever ones you belong to, makes you a potential target of voter disenfranchisement. At he same time making it easier for: old, male, white, Christian, wealthy, uneducated, straight, multi-generational American.
If convicted felons can be president, they should be allowed to vote too. |
||
| 20 | |||
|
BarneyPiccolo
lemmy.today
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-06-30 |
As a non white lol why can’t I vote? I’m a legal citizen I will have no issue. I would like to know what rights the whites have over me?
You aren't wealthy enough to have rights. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
AlexLost
lemmy.world
AlexLost@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-07-02 |
I thought incest was illegal? |
||
| 5 | |||
|
spencerwi
feddit.org
spencerwi@feddit.org Joined: 2025-06-05 |
I definitely trust the prediction markets more than just about any poll.
Why would I need Steve Kornacki or whoever when I've got degenerate gamblers? |
||
| 3 | |||
|
spencerwi
feddit.org
spencerwi@feddit.org Joined: 2025-06-05 |
Do the Republicans really think they are going to benefit from a requirement that disenfranchises people who don't have proof of citizenship like: -Women who got married and took their husbands last name -People who keep getting divorced over and over again -People who have never travelled outside the US Bear in mind that the people who are basically guaranteed to have their documents in order ...
See, the thing Jim Crow and its "literacy tests" taught us is that you just need a rule that you can enforce on the wrong people, and then you just choose not to enforce it when it's convenient. |
||
| 26 | |||
explodicle
sh.itjust.works
explodicle@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2024-04-11 |
When my wife and I married she only took my last name because her father abandoned her when she was 6 months old, and she wanted to erase that from her identity.
One of my male coworkers at a previous job did the same thing for the same reason, took his wife's name. |
||
| 6 | |||
explodicle
sh.itjust.works
explodicle@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2024-04-11 |
Or else what |
||
| 5 | |||
apftwb
lemmy.world
apftwb@lemmy.worldJoined: 2025-06-22 |
Last I checked the federal government cannot tell the states how to run their elections? |
||
| 9 | |||
mycodesucks
lemmy.world
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-08 |
People who receive and respond to polls are also a subset with biases.
That's true, but also a group that has a real and vested interest in getting the answer RIGHT. That helps. |
||
| 4 | |||
M0oP0o
mander.xyz
M0oP0o@mander.xyzJoined: 2023-06-13 |
Wait, this is even dumber then it looks like. Under this crap unmarried women will be unaffected but the more traditional marriage types will be hooped. So this will remove the "trad" wife votes but not touch the ladies in say the local polycule. Gee I wonder if all the single/divorced women will be more or less likely to vote for the red party? |
||
| 17 | |||
|
NotMyOldRedditName
lemmy.world
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-24 |
And here I thought I was clicking on a post where some MAGA 2nd amendment woman shot themselves in the foot with a gun, not once, but twice. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
UnspecificGravity
piefed.social
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social Joined: 2025-12-03 |
See, the thing Jim Crow and its "literacy tests" taught us is that you just need a rule that you can enforce on the wrong people, and then you just choose not to enforce it when it's convenient.
But that's the thing. YOU know that. But do they? ID verification, unlike literacy tests, is pretty objective. There isn't much room to target that enforcement apart from the existing biases in who has id and who doesn't. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Formfiller
lemmy.world
Formfiller@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-03-12 |
I’d be willing to bet this will disenfranchise more republican women than democrat women. Democrats are way more likely to have a passport |
||
| 13 | |||
TheEmpireStrikesDak
thelemmy.club
DakRalter@thelemmy.clubJoined: 2023-06-15 |
Easy solution, just don't marry anyone with a different last name.
I get the joke, but is it really so rare in the US for a woman to keep her own surname after marriage? |
||
| 4 | |||
|
fulcrummed
lemmy.world
fulcrummed@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-01 |
As a non white lol why can’t I vote? I’m a legal citizen I will have no issue. I would like to know what rights the whites have over me?
|
||
| 11 | |||
Apathy Tree
lemmy.dbzer0.com
ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2023-06-23 |
Looking forward to being a future target for never having married and/or taken a man’s name next! None of us are safe until all of us are safe. |
||
| 30 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 1 of 5
Goto page
1, 2, 3 ... 5
Next
Last »
Back to top |