I mean you kind of still can. Wire frame sunglasses are still too small to have recording hardware.

Following for the iOS port

The truth is that we already are living in the surveillance state and people are just going to have to "get over" being recorded in public by anyone that walks by.

I don't like it either. But that's the reality we're entering into, where privacy isn't a right but a privilege and that privilege does not exist save for some very select (if any at this point) places like your home ... Maybe.

No, people do not have to get over that. People need to stand up for their rights. Being in a public space isn't justification to have your movements recorded and logged 24/7. Stop being the fucking knee you coward.

I agree but the biggest defense for this is to always assume you're being recorded when in public even if you're not. You never know.

The issue becomes relevant in private spaces, to me. Nobody with smart glasses is coming into my home.

What does this even mean? You gonna punch every other person you see?

Fuck off with your disingenuous comment

Should be expanded for IP cams

Doesn't this boil down to self-censorship in public? Better not critizise the government in public becaus you never know whos waring smart glasses...

Forgive the machine translation to English, but reading that shows the a very similar exception to privacy protection we have here in the USA

Here's one example:

"There are exceptions to events (demonstrations, general meetings, cultural events, etc.). Here, participants must expect to be photographed. This is about what is happening and not about the person itself. "

Most of the wiki article is talking specifically about copyright, which isn't the scope of what we're talking about. Publication of taken images is a different topic.

the biggest defense for this is to always assume you’re being recorded when in public even if you’re not

So women in July should wear tarps?

What posible application is there for this CreepTech?

Sure, that creepy 48 year old on the subway is just looking for a Charmander.

Last thing I’d want is to be in the middle of something with my hands full and the display bugs out, blocking the one eye, making me screw something up.

Maybe don't cause your own problems.

Pretty sure the Meta Glasses come with NipAlert pre-installed.

Ofc I don’t want this. But I look at my wife and daughter and their safety comes first hence the dilemma. And philosophy should be considered as well.

i mean... you can also just look around and see the guy with the dorky out-of-place classes...

Those who would give up any measures of Liberty to purchase any amount of temporary Security deserve neither Liberty or Security.

You are thinking Google Glass. Those aint those anymore.

If you want to bend and spread, you do you. You don't have to tell us to "get over" it and share your fetish. That's a not-nice thing to do.

I would love for an AI machine to be all knowing and all pervasive. It honestly sounds like it could be great.

Except definitelt not because we know 100% that nobody could be trusted to be in charge of it.

You don't need to actively punch everyone you see. Just punch the Nazis. For the privacy part, what one could reasonably do once the tech becomes affordable is to eg.: wear passive EMP devices or something similar that disable cameras near you (at some point, the tech has to fit in a space too small for EMP shielding).

Unneeded. We already have a tool for that it's called blueprints, they haven't failed in over 3000 years.

Lemmy.world mods. They are kinda like feddit.org mods. Whiny cocksuckers who are just so happy to vent their frustrations (or pretend ones) on their userbase.

Breaking someone's legs requires excessive force, so no, you would not be within your rights to break someone's legs for punching you in the face. That would absolutely be an escalation of force and not legally defendable.

In order to shoot someone in self defense, you have to prove that you feared for your life. Its not a get out of jail free card.

Didn't say there was

I like AGPL in theory, but in practice it never works like that. They are protected by a smoke screen — you don’t know if they are using something, how they are using it, or what they’ve built on it — and even if something did leak about their usage they are protected by money — the vast majority of FOSS projects won’t have the resources to pursue any kind of legal enforcement or reasonable remedy. In practice, they will use and build on A/GPL software while contributing nothing back in blatant violation of the spirit and intent of the license, because who is going to find out or enforce it?

Blueprints don't fail, people really really often do though. People measure wrong, or build on the wrong side of the line they've drawn. It's not a question about "Is it essential", it's a question about "Will it make it easier, faster and less errorprone".

Na, I'm looking at the RAY-BAN META GLASSES and they look strait out of some 1970s/1980s "I work at NASA/IBM" movie. Still dorky.

I mean, the Flipper Zero is just a computer with a few radios built-in.

I think the only one they share with most smart glasses is Bluetooth which might potentially have some vulnerabilities which could be exploited, but there are also expansion cards for the Flipper Zero that add everything from wifi and ethernet ports to high-powered IR blasters, so the real question is how vulnerable smart glasses are.

And the truth is, they're vulnerable by default because they rely on corpo servers to operate like any other "smart" device. Any flaw in the security of the glasses themselves barely holds a candle to the fact that they forward everything to Facebook or some other big tech brand name with a financial interest in monetizing your data.

I'm just being realistic about the future. You already are carrying around a machine that's listening and watching. You're walking into and out of stores where you're on camera. Hell you're driving past however many cameras in your car or walking past them on the street, every business, every office, every space has cameras now.

Thus, I think eventually more and more augmented reality devices will be seen because people will come to appreciate their uses outside of just being recording devices once that concern is overcome. In other words, wearing AR glasses won't get you default labeled as some perverted weirdo.

You don't need to bend over and spread but we're past the point where there should be any expectation of privacy in public spaces. I'm not saying I like it, I'm saying I expect our society to continue to move towards a surveillance model where privacy simply cannot be expected in any public space.

Do I think it's dystopian and bad, yes, yes I do. I also think we need strong privacy protections for our private domiciles. That doesn't mean my opinion is aligned with what actually is going to happen in our world.

I don't want it but it's what is going to happen and has been happening.

I'm just being realistic about the future. You already are carrying around a machine that's listening and watching. You're walking into and out of stores where you're on camera. Hell you're driving past however many cameras in your car or walking past them on the street, every business, every office, every space has cameras now.

Thus, I think eventually more and more augmented reality devices will be seen because people will come to appreciate their uses outside of just being recording devices once that concern is overcome. In other words, wearing AR glasses won't get you default labeled as some perverted weirdo.

You don't need to bend the knee but we're past the point where there should be any expectation of privacy in public spaces. I'm not saying I like it, I'm saying I expect our society to continue to move towards a surveillance model where privacy simply cannot be expected in any public space.

Do I think it's dystopian and bad, yes, yes I do. I also think we need strong privacy protections for our private domiciles. That doesn't mean my opinion is aligned with what actually is going to happen in our world.

I don't want it but it's what is going to happen and has been happening.

now if i could get that app without a phone, and with a warning of nearby phones too...

i wonder if it can detect the snapchat ones too.

"Here's a list of reasons why all hope is lost and you too should bend the knee."

That's all I read. C.O.W.A.R.D.

Is unsolved assault cases currently a problem? That sounds like an answer looking for a problem to me.

They are used for that kind of applications already. You put one of those on, and some technician remotely guides you in doing some maintenance while looking through your eyes. They can mark things in your fov, show you diagrams, whatever. Pretty neat actually.

Warning: there is probably a bunch of phones near you right now.

I don't want to have to keep up with the current styles of SmartGlasses from however many makers of these things there are at any given time. I am happy to outsource this awareness to someone I can find good reason to trust to provide me the info I need. Just like I don't make my own vaccines, because I have no idea how to get the 5G that small.

Fucking assholes would sell out the world for a false sense of security.

I agree with the core of your point. I'd like to assert, though, that all people exert some level of self-censorship in public on the basis of the opinions of their neighbors and peers. Having to worry about powerful organizations like governments and megacorps also always being there (instead of just sometimes, or usually) adds a new degree of reason to self-censor, for sure.

There is no reason for anyone to be walking around and public with hidden cameras.

They should be only with transparent plastic a flashing LED that signals CREEP in morse.

Let's see how "cool" and "normalized" they are when police arrest the first guy recording around a playgound.

It apparently works with the bluetooth signals which I found really smart.

There's a difference between taking a picture of a person and taking a picture of scenery or event with a person in it in Germany.

It's a subtle but significant difference. And relevant when talking about do you have to expect for your picture to be taken. You may not care when your in the background or not identifiable but at the same time care when someone knows you and takes photography of you, or takes photos of you where you're the main focus of the image.

There's a distinction between whether they will be published or are for private use too.

GNSS isn't really accurate enough for this, especially in urban environments where there is poor line of sight to most of the satellites.

I just re-watched Ghost in the Shell SAC Laughing Man last night, and wouldn't mind seeing these things get hacked with the Laughing Man logo replacing any face it was looking at, re-writing signs, etc.