RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Stephen Colbert’s unaired James Talarico interview hits 6.4 million YouTube views and results in $2.5 million raised for Talarico’s campaign in 24 hours
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Sigilos ttrpg.network BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network
Joined: 2023-06-28
#52 · Quote Reply

The fuck you mean "outdated"? That prevision is not a "social media" thing, it's a "any platform that hosts user generated content" thing. It's the only thing that even allows user generated content in the first place. It would effectively break any forum and even hosted chat applications because it would make the platform liable for anything their users do that breaks the law. But it also adds...

This is exactly why I asked if anyone could clarify for me, I didn't understand what was really being put on the political table here. Thank you for elucidating, the language used to write these proposals is often confusing for me. I understand that's often done purposely by the people submitting such legislation, so I usually have to find someone who can understand it better then I can.

1
Sigilos ttrpg.network BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network
Joined: 2023-06-28
#53 · Quote Reply

"Outdated" is pretty debatable. The fear is that once platforms are legally liable for user posted content it will lead to an environment of censorship. Anything the federal government (or indeed private entities) don't want talked about, they can simply tell social media companies to take down. Chances are the companies will comply because they don't want to deal with the potential consequence...

This is why I asked if anyone could clarify for me. Thank you for explaining in a more natural manor, the language used to write these proposals is often confusing for me.

With your clarification, it definitely seems to me like the protections in place should stay there. Maybe there are issues with some of these companies, but I don't think removing these particular protections will change the issues I see, just stifle open speech.

2
exaybachae startrek.website exaybachae@startrek.website
Joined: 2026-02-16
#54 · Quote Reply

7.89 million now haha.

8.4 and climbing

1
exaybachae startrek.website exaybachae@startrek.website
Joined: 2026-02-16
#55 · (edited) Quote Reply

Is 6 million views a lot for him? How does that compare to his other videos?

Not sure what this article says, but I read statistics show most Colbert shows get about 2.5mil views when initially aired.

Even his most viewed, like with Taylor Swift tend to be pretty low.

They do get streamed online after, and copied and shared in ways that likely are not tracked officially.

This video almost immediately matched those aired show views, and continues to climb.

It's at 8.4mil currently.

2
exaybachae startrek.website exaybachae@startrek.website
Joined: 2026-02-16
#56 · Quote Reply

Anyone got a link to the video that's not on YouTube

No, we want the view count there to go up.

It sends an important message about censorship.

If you hate ads, and you see them there, use an ad blocker or alternative YouTube app like Revanced.

1
quick_snail feddit.nl quick_snail@feddit.nl
Joined: 2025-07-15
#57 · Quote Reply

No, we want the view count there to go up. It sends an important message about censorship. If you hate ads, and you see them there, use an ad blocker or alternative YouTube app like Revanced.

YouTube doesn't load for people who use hardened browsers for years.

We literally can't view it.

1
pyre lemmy.world pyre@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-11-12
#58 · Quote Reply

props to Colbert, btw, for all his faults, he did do whatever he could to expose the capitulators. he could have gone the safe route and not said anything.

3
Naia lemmy.blahaj.zone Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2023-07-02
#59 · Quote Reply

This is exactly why I asked if anyone could clarify for me, I didn't understand what was really being put on the political table here. Thank you for elucidating, the language used to write these proposals is often confusing for me. I understand that's often done purposely by the people submitting such legislation, so I usually have to find someone who can understand it better then I can.

That's fair. I do apologize for my tone, but I'm queer and a core of all these attacks on free speech are directed at the LGBTQ community so I tend to get heated about it, especially if someone seems to dismiss the importance of protections like that.

2
Sigilos ttrpg.network BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network
Joined: 2023-06-28
#60 · Quote Reply

That's fair. I do apologize for my tone, but I'm queer and a core of all these attacks on free speech are directed at the LGBTQ community so I tend to get heated about it, especially if someone seems to dismiss the importance of protections like that.

I understand. I'm ND so it's hard for me to pickup social cues as it is, text makes it especially hard to figure out emotion or intention at times.

Thank you again for helping me understand a little better. 😁

1
Naia lemmy.blahaj.zone Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2023-07-02
#61 · Quote Reply

I understand. I'm ND so it's hard for me to pickup social cues as it is, text makes it especially hard to figure out emotion or intention at times. Thank you again for helping me understand a little better. 😁

I have ADHD (diagnosed) and also likely autism (undiagnosed), so I understand.

I ended up figuring out a specific way to write online because people seemed to intentionally assume the worst interpretation of what I said, usually adding meaning I didn't.

Unfortunately, because the way I write is semi-formal I now regularly get accused of using or being "AI" I guess it's because I "use words" and "know things".

2
Post Reply Page 2 of 2   Goto page « First 1, 2
Back to top