| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » US Law (local/state/federal) ⚖ |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
evenwicht
lemmy.sdf.org
evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org Joined: 2024-07-01 |
Link: https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/ExpatFIRE/comments/16wad6a/us_physical_address_vs_pmb_for_expats/
Some banks have started demanding proof of address when they realize that the address they have on file is “commercial”, e.g. like a UPS Store PMB type of address. How would this play out in court? The law¹ states:
(emphasis mine) Banks seem to be over-reacting to law that is more lenient than what banks are interpreting. Not only are business addresses allowed, but a bank customer can even supply someone else’s address. The law also seems to distinguish between old customers and new. Yet out of the blue banks are harrassing customers who have had an account for years. They have a gov-issued ID doc and SSN, yet suddenly the banks get anal and persnickety about the address to the extreme of freezing people’s accounts as databases grow (DBs that track the zoning an address is in). Has this been challenged in court? It’s clear from the linked thread that customers either dance for the banks or get their accounts frozen. It could be hard to challenge in court since banks can demand whatever info they want even if not required by law. But if they suddenly close an account that has been established, that could cause damages to the customer. One interpretation is that legislators intended the business address to be that of the customer’s workplace. But the law does not seem to specify that. ¹ 31 C.F.R. § 103.121 |
||
| 1 Original | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |