RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Ms. Rachel’s hot take: Racist nursery rhymes need to be retired
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
velma sh.itjust.works velma@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-07
Quote

43   Original
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#2 · Quote Reply

Burying the lede: Ms. Rachel normalizes mass transit.

15
velma Moderator velma@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-07
#3 · Quote Reply

Burying the lede: Ms. Rachel normalizes mass transit.

I’ve really come to enjoy these subway interviews! It’s cool to have it be on transit.

8
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#4 · Quote Reply

I’ve really come to enjoy these subway interviews! It’s cool to have it be on transit.

Watching Sex and the City, it really is remarkable how stuck up the ladies are. I don't think there's a single scene that happens on the subway or bus; they are forever taking taxis or getting driven (I think only one even has a drivers license).

9
velma Moderator velma@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-07
#5 · Quote Reply

Watching Sex and the City, it really is remarkable how stuck up the ladies are. I don't think there's a single scene that happens on the subway or bus; they are forever taking taxis or getting driven (I think only one even has a drivers license).

Hah yeah I did a rewatch of Sex and the City last year and you’re soooo right - all the taxis, all the fanciest cocktails, all the white people - it’s incredibly “high class”.

I still love Samantha’s observations about some of that, it’s the best when she’s calling the other ladies out on their shit.

8
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#6 · (edited) Quote Reply

Hah yeah I did a rewatch of Sex and the City last year and you’re soooo right - all the taxis, all the fanciest cocktails, all the white people - it’s incredibly “high class”. I still love Samantha’s observations about some of that, it’s the best when she’s calling the other ladies out on their shit.

What do you make of the recent turn against SatC? It seems the going cultural concern is the glamorization of Carrie's psychological mess is Bad for Girls.

I'm of the opinion that we need negative as well as positive role models, but I haven´t finished the series yet or gotten to the movies, where I think it seems like the narratives lets Carrie's nonsense go wholly unexamined and uncommented on. I have gotten to the affair with Big (cheating on Aidan) and I think they handled it well.

eta: don´t remember much social commentary from Samantha.

One of my favorite things to do, as well, watching SatC is note how often episodes fail the Bechdel test.

5
velma Moderator velma@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-07
#7 · Quote Reply

What do you make of the recent turn against SatC? It seems the going cultural concern is the glamorization of Carrie's psychological mess is Bad for Girls. I'm of the opinion that we need negative as well as positive role models, but I haven´t finished the series yet or gotten to the movies, where I think it seems like the narratives lets Carrie's nonsense go wholly unexamined and uncommented o...

I think it's good to look back and dissect the problems with the media we've consumed and normalized in the past. SatC was on the forefront of a lot social issues - hell, even producing a show that focused on single women was provocative at the time - and while they got it wrong sometimes, they got it right, too.

Samantha was the first sex-positive woman I saw in media. She also was always unapologetically herself despite how cruel society can be to strong women like that.

A guy gets angry in a meeting, he's a pistol. A woman? She's emotional."

"I will not be judged by you or society. I will wear whatever and blow whomever I want as long as I can breathe—and kneel!"

"Listen to me. The right guy is an illusion. Start living your lives."

Early in the series, Samantha introduces the philosophy that successful, financially stable New York women should "have sex like a man"—meaning with zero emotional baggage or expectations of commitment. Her behavior serves as a mirror to male privilege, highlighting how economic power grants women the same luxury to treat men as fleeting sexual objects

3
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#8 · (edited) Quote Reply

I think it's good to look back and dissect the problems with the media we've consumed and normalized in the past. SatC was on the forefront of a lot social issues - hell, even producing a show that focused on single women was provocative at the time - and while they got it wrong sometimes, they got it right, too. Samantha was the first sex-positive woman I saw in media. She also was always unap...

Ah, yes, I do remember that about Samantha. "They don´t call it a blowjob for nothing, honey." But I thought you were talking about class commentary, which, Miranda's boyfriend Steve aside, is mostly elided in the series.

Would you have written Samantha differently if you could? I found the criticism of her just being a gay man in a woman's body extremely compelling; she never seemed to face any of the dangers a woman would realistically face in being as openly promiscuous as she was. She is also kind of hilariously square most of the time. Any time some actual kink comes up, she absolutely freaks out.

eta - I think the backdrop of Samantha, as you presented her, is to argue that sexual politics is based on economics, not biology. I partially disagree. I think economics plays a role, surely, but there are sexual behaviors that tend to cluster around gender biologically. I don´t think gender is entirely socially constructed, though social factors absolutely do play a role.

2
velma Moderator velma@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-07
#9 · Quote Reply

Ah, yes, I do remember that about Samantha. "They don´t call it a blowjob for nothing, honey." But I thought you were talking about class commentary, which, Miranda's boyfriend Steve aside, is mostly elided in the series. Would you have written Samantha differently if you could? I found the criticism of her just being a gay man in a woman's body extremely compelling; she never seemed to face an...

Ah yeah I should've pulled more examples specifically of class consciousness. I'd have to dig for more specifics there, but I do remember this conversation very clearly from my rewatch:

The ladies talking about class, wealth, and the differences between men and women who have money: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4KQCd8G_t8

Would I rewrite Samantha's character? I'm not so sure. I think for the time she was the breath of fresh air for women's independence. An allowance for women to be selfish that was very much needed to be put on display. The criticism of her being a gay man in a woman's body is valid, but I think that is also precisely where the value lies. In a world where women have true freedom, why wouldn't some of us act like gay men?

It's funny you mention that Samantha freaks out when kink comes up! I always thought the opposite like when she called herself a "try-sexual" and that she would trying anything once. She took a tantric sex class and I think was pictured in a BDSM dungeon once or twice on the show. She also entered into a sexual relationship with a woman as an exploration of her own sexual identity.

2
SlightlyNormal lemmy.world SlightlyNormal@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-06
#10 · Quote Reply

Haven't watched the video yet, but when I found out the American traditional version of Eeny Meeny Miny Moe I was horrified.

15
velma Moderator velma@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-07
#11 · Quote Reply

Haven't watched the video yet, but when I found out the American traditional version of Eeny Meeny Miny Moe I was horrified.

I was horrified when I learned what "tiger" used to be in that nursery rhyme.

12
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#12 · Quote Reply

Ah yeah I should've pulled more examples specifically of class consciousness. I'd have to dig for more specifics there, but I do remember this conversation very clearly from my rewatch: The ladies talking about class, wealth, and the differences between men and women who have money: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4KQCd8G_t8 Would I rewrite Samantha's character? I'm not so sure. I think for th...

I can't believe I missed the awkward framing of that conversation the first time!

Yes, I think this is precursor Girl Boss framing. Wouldn't it be great if (white) women could get to the top of the economic hierarchy? Post Sheryl Sandberg, I think everyone sees the flaws there.

As for Samantha's kinks, I have to disagree. She talks a big game, and she has a lot of sex, but when it comes to actual non-vanilla sex, she either runs away from it, or the show lets her off the hook. Two examples are when she abandons a guy tied up in his closet, and another is when she agrees to have a threesome with two gay men, but they end up being more interested in each other. The show has lots of other examples of anti-kink (like Carrie's politician's boyfriends interest in watersports was treated with ridicule, even though he was respectful about expressing his interest). Samantha is great about talking about sexual liberation (to the point of tediousness, honestly), but her behavior trends strongly vanilla.

Back to classism, the episode with the gay threesome, Samantha proudly declares that the year is 2000 and labels are dead; all that matters is that you are good in bed. Sounds good, yet Samantha almost exclusively sleeps with upperclass men with the exceptions (firemen, farmers) being explicit exceptions. So labels don't matter, but income definitely does.

I wouldn't say anything on the show wholly escapes examination, but there is definitely subtext.

Like I said, I've got to plow through the rest of the mess with Big and Aidan and get to the movies so I can be caught up, though honestly I think I might be willing to take the zeitgeist's opinion on the films at its word.

3
Nasan sopuli.xyz Nasan@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2023-07-01
#13 · Quote Reply

I was horrified when I learned what "tiger" used to be in that nursery rhyme.

For better or worse, Pulp Fiction made this glaringly obvious for teenage me.

7
GraniteM lemmy.world GraniteM@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-11
#14 · Quote Reply

We've got to retire that standard ice cream truck jingle, too.

8
ricecake sh.itjust.works ricecake@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-11
#15 · Quote Reply

We've got to retire that standard ice cream truck jingle, too.

For anyone else who has a moment like I did: pop goes the weasel is fine.
Turkey in the straw has a more complicated history. It may have a benign origin, but it also definitely has a history with some awful lyrics and context.

Pop goes the weasel is clearly superior.

8
cantstopthesignal sh.itjust.works cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-28
#16 · (edited) Quote Reply

Hah yeah I did a rewatch of Sex and the City last year and you’re soooo right - all the taxis, all the fanciest cocktails, all the white people - it’s incredibly “high class”. I still love Samantha’s observations about some of that, it’s the best when she’s calling the other ladies out on their shit.

I mean, that's the attitude of people in the West Village to this day. Sex in the City was originally a column based on the author's lived experiences. They never took the subway because Carrie Bradshaw would never be caught dead on the subway or in a sub-$300 pair of shoes.

7
blkvvvs lemmy.zip blkvvvs@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-07-29
#17 · Quote Reply

We've got to retire that standard ice cream truck jingle, too.

RZA made a new ice cream jingle some time ago in partnership with Good Humor.

3
zarkanian sh.itjust.works zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-01-11
#18 · Quote Reply

  1. Why are they talking into credit cards?

  2. It's awesome that Ms. Rachel just carries around lollipops with her.

  3. That bit about the preexisting conditions is bonkers.

"That kid died because they couldn't get any food!"

"Nuh-uh! They had a preexisting condition!"

So, the idea is that because the kid was already sick, we can blame the sickness, not the starvation.

It was the same logic that people tried to use in the early days of the pandemic: supposedly, only people with preexisting conditions died while sick with COVID, therefore...the virus wasn't to blame or something? If you were healthy, then you had nothing to worry about? Just weird logic.

5
velma Moderator velma@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-07
#19 · Quote Reply

Why are they talking into credit cards? It's awesome that Ms. Rachel just carries around lollipops with her. That bit about the preexisting conditions is bonkers. "That kid died because they couldn't get any food!" "Nuh-uh! They had a preexisting condition!" So, the idea is that because the kid was already sick, we can blame the sickness, not the starvation. It was the same logic that people tr...

I think they're Metro cards, maybe the microphone is just clipped to them so it's easier to hold?

3
KaChilde sh.itjust.works KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-08-31
#20 · Quote Reply

Why are they talking into credit cards? It's awesome that Ms. Rachel just carries around lollipops with her. That bit about the preexisting conditions is bonkers. "That kid died because they couldn't get any food!" "Nuh-uh! They had a preexisting condition!" So, the idea is that because the kid was already sick, we can blame the sickness, not the starvation. It was the same logic that people tr...

It’s the conceit of the channel: Subway takes.

Kareem asks guests for their hot takes while riding the subway. Their mics are clipped to metrocards to be on theme. Though apparently metrocards have been retired in nyc as of Jan this year.

3
BarneyPiccolo lemmy.today BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-06-30
#21 · Quote Reply

I think they're Metro cards, maybe the microphone is just clipped to them so it's easier to hold?

Clipping a little mic to an odd object is a new video thing. I saw a girl with one attached to a fork the other day. Most just hold it, but I get why people do it - it's fun!

2
Post Reply
Back to top