| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» Linux
Page 2 of 2 Goto page « First Previous 1, 2 |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Arthur Besse
Moderator
cypherpunks@lemmy.mlJoined: 2022-01-17 |
It’s literally the first sentence of their policy. Yes, but what about the 2nd sentence? The following is not allowed in Nura: Submitting contributions fully or in part created by generative AI tools to Nura. Recommending generative AI tools to other community members for solving problems in the Nura space. As you can see, it says nothing about researching, troubleshooting, reverse-engineering,...
I'm not sure if you're joking or legitimately confused, but, assuming the latter, fyi the "AI" that people use for "researching, troubleshooting, reverse-engineering, etc" is part of what is called "generative AI". Given this, it's not much a stretch to read it as saying that even posting in Nura forums about the existence of @sv1sjp@lemmy.world's github repo would actually be a violation of Nura's policy (as of today; I expect it will evolve in the not-too-distant future). |
||
| 4 | |||
sudoer777
lemmy.ml
sudoer777@lemmy.mlJoined: 2021-02-18 |
It's not a good tool for research, it will just generate a hallucination and you end up doing something which does not work or just works somehow, but is not done correctly and will break in the future. I talked to quite a few people recently at the postmarketOS and Alpine Linux conference, it definitely was noticed that more contributions are now coming in that do things wrong or in a subtly b...
I've used AI for low level debugging on things that are basically undocumented to fix my personal machines, doesn't eliminate the trial and error process but it's gotten me farther a lot faster than if I were to do it on my own. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
diaphragmwp
discuss.tchncs.de
diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2026-06-03 |
basically everything is de-facto capitalism I wouldn't go that far. The majority mode of production of the world today is capitalism. But that doesn't mean 'everything' is capitalism. Neither does it mean that the majority mode of production of the world will be capitalism tomorrow. The same applies to energy production from fossil fuels. In fact, there the transition (to renewables) is far mor...
I said basically.
Wanna bet? I close my eyes, sleep, wake up sometime (hopefully) then check.
Intentional anarcho-communistic commune somewhere in the middle of Denmark. Denmark is fine with it because it's making tourist money. It's like a cool fact, like "did you know there's a place where people avoid using money". Obviously, they go out sometimes. Apart from that, stuff done there that is only "ethical outside of capitalism" isn't ethical for the outside world. If someone does vibecoding there and considers it ethical for some reason but not outside (like the de facto lack of enforcement for intellectual property because it's no longer needed), people outside still can't use the work ethically. From what I've heard, they aren't even really good with computers there, and I am not aware of any attempts to make their own.
Both? Some people don't want data harvesting yet it's done. The CEO gets capital, so do investment companies and maybe some client companies. EDIT: even if the electricity is sourced "ethically" (no), the compute itself is attributing to climate change. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
erebion
news.erebion.eu
erebion@news.erebion.eu Joined: 2025-11-20 |
You make the world a better place with the tools you have in this world. If you wait for perfect tools, you will get nowhere. In the case of AI, your choices are over whether and which models you use. Your choice has zero impact on what others do with it. Let us take OP's case. Their choices are (1) run an AI for some time to make an older phone model usable for some more years, and (2) don't, ...
You create a false dichotomy. |
||
| -1 | |||
|
Shayeta
feddit.org
Shayeta@feddit.org Joined: 2025-02-24 |
As you can see, it says nothing about researching, troubleshooting, reverse-engineering, etc. As long as you write and understand the code yourself AI is allowed for everything else. As long as you’re not using generative AI it’s fine. I'm not sure if you're joking or legitimately confused, but, assuming the latter, fyi the "AI" that people use for "researching, troubleshooting, reverse-enginee...
That's fair. It would certainly align with the described "spirit" of the policy. Hopefully it becomes clearer in the future. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
emergencyfood
sh.itjust.works
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-03 |
that doesn't mean 'everything' I said basically. Neither does it mean that the majority mode of production of the world will be capitalism tomorrow. Wanna bet? I close my eyes, sleep, wake up sometime (hopefully) then check. Christiania Intentional anarcho-communistic commune somewhere in the middle of Denmark. Denmark is fine with it because it's making tourist money. It's like a cool fact, li...
Ah, so there are alternatives.
If you can sleep as long as Rip van Winkle, you might see it change. (Obviously the error margins are huge, but I expect capitalism to stop being the majority economic system in the world in about thirty years. Emphasis on the 'about'.)
Okay, so mentally children. Expect nothing significant from them.
I don't think data harvesting per se is going away. Even in an ideal world, the state would need to collect a lot of data about people to efficiently allocate resources (i.e. budget correctly). As for corporations, the CEO getting capital, and so on, those are results of capitalism. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
AnimalsDream
slrpnk.net
AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net Joined: 2024-06-29 |
Huh, Nura? I like the name PostmarketOS better, but that's just me. Cool that you got it working with ai, but I hope that doesn't become a standard in device porting. Sure with proper vetting the code can be ensured to be maintainable, but that code had to come from somewhere. These systems don't just magically know how to make software work, so it sounds like they're probably just referencing code somewhere else that could be under any kind of copyright. Sounds like a legal nightmare waiting to happen. The thing I'm really hoping for is these general purpose mobile Linux systems being ported to the plethora of bootleg retro handhelds out there. The majority of these devices already have unlocked bootloaders and are super friendly to third party firmware. The problem is people are only porting these hyper minimalist emulation-focused Linux builds when there's so much untapped potential. |
||
| 9 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
Very considerate of you to await him at the destination.
One of the issues there is that I will most likely not recognise them by the time they get there, due to all of the other zombies/crypto-bros/trash, many of whom are clearly frequenting this sub now. |
||
| -1 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
They have given five reasons for not using AI:- water and energy use worker exploitatio worker layoffs use of other's work without consent not understanding what the code is actually doing Of these, the first is a result of using fossil fuels, the second and third are a result of capitalism, and the fourth is only a problem if you believe in the whole 'intellectual property' charade. Only the f...
wtf |
||
| 1 | |||
|
GeorgimusPrime
lemmy.world
GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-14 |
They have given five reasons for not using AI:- water and energy use worker exploitatio worker layoffs use of other's work without consent not understanding what the code is actually doing Of these, the first is a result of using fossil fuels, the second and third are a result of capitalism, and the fourth is only a problem if you believe in the whole 'intellectual property' charade. Only the f...
"Intellectual property" is mostly a capitalist idea. To give a direct example of the harm caused by LLMs using others' work without attribution or credit, there is the recent case in which one of the models was being portrayed as finding a mathematical proof which was actually in it's training data. The original authors will not get the credit, academic support, exposure and funding they would have gotten otherwise. Also, even if information is not "owned", it's epistemology and source are an important part of it. Consumption by LLMs degrades the information by removing such metadata, and even worse hallucinating sources. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
BreakingBigfoot
lemmus.org
BreakingBigfoot@lemmus.org Joined: 2026-10-03 |
I have a pinephone pro, seems like manjaro bricked it and I can't flash the rom again ...Any theories on what to do? |
||
| 2 | |||
|
emergencyfood
sh.itjust.works
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-03 |
"Intellectual property" is mostly a capitalist idea. To give a direct example of the harm caused by LLMs using others' work without attribution or credit, there is the recent case in which one of the models was being portrayed as finding a mathematical proof which was actually in it's training data. The original authors will not get the credit, academic support, exposure and funding they would ...
If the original authors have published their findings somewhere (journal / conference / arXiv), they will definitely get the credit from other mathematicians.
I don't know about all AIs, but deepseek does cite sources. You can always cross-check them. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
m532
lemmy.ml
m532@lemmy.ml Joined: 2021-06-05 |
One of the issues there is that I will most likely not recognise them by the time they get there, due to all of the other zombies/crypto-bros/trash, many of whom are clearly frequenting this sub now.
"Everyone who disagrees with me is a lesser person" Idealists' favourite coping method |
||
| 2 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
"Everyone who disagrees with me is a lesser person" Idealists' favourite coping method
No coping, "idealist" is not the slur you think it is, and it isn't even relevant to this. ai is owned and controlled by really dodgy people. If you watch videos of jensen huang, sam altman, alex karp, elon musk etc, and don't see anything wrong, you are what is wrong. You are the only person who is to blame for your lack of standards. |
||
| 1 | |||
Libre Extremist
lemmy.ml
liberatedGuy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2022-01-25 |
[removed by moderator]
|
||
| 0 | |||
|
Rolivers
discuss.tchncs.de
Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2023-06-15 |
Well well well, you have something to xiaomi. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
GeorgimusPrime
lemmy.world
GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-14 |
one of the models was being portrayed as finding a mathematical proof which was actually in it's training data. The original authors will not get the credit, academic support, exposure and funding they would have gotten otherwise. If the original authors have published their findings somewhere (journal / conference / arXiv), they will definitely get the credit from other mathematicians. it's ep...
Unfortunately the proof found by the LLM combines work by different teams of mathematicians that cannot individually be published as proofs. It's the equivalent of a scoop in investigation journalism by someone who was spying on journalists instead of doing any investigating. It's on lemmy/wired: https://lemmy.world/post/52843754 It's good that some do cite sources, however one major problem with generative AI is that it can produce volumes of output much faster than they can be verified. "You can always cross-check" is not viable at scale, and by the time LLM output gets cited, it becomes a quagmire potentially unlimited levels deep. LLM output should never be treated as original until they can show their work transparently. |
||
| 1 | |||
KimBongUn420
lemmy.ml
KimBongUn420@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-07-05 |
[removed by moderator]
According to western media, thinktanks and commentators comfortably sitting and circlejerking in the imperial core, yes.
Easily disproved by random travel bloggers that travel China e.g. Xinjiang and Tibet |
||
| 1 | |||
|
OilyArena
lemmy.ml
OilyArena@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-02-17 |
No coping, "idealist" is not the slur you think it is, and it isn't even relevant to this. ai is owned and controlled by really dodgy people. If you watch videos of jensen huang, sam altman, alex karp, elon musk etc, and don't see anything wrong, you are what is wrong. trump is a huge fan... You are the only person who is to blame for your lack of standards.
"Idealism is not relevant to this discussion" proceeds to use purely idealist arguments |
||
| 1 | |||
|
m532
lemmy.ml
m532@lemmy.ml Joined: 2021-06-05 |
No coping, "idealist" is not the slur you think it is, and it isn't even relevant to this. ai is owned and controlled by really dodgy people. If you watch videos of jensen huang, sam altman, alex karp, elon musk etc, and don't see anything wrong, you are what is wrong. trump is a huge fan... You are the only person who is to blame for your lack of standards.
Idealism is not a slur, but the philosophy that liberalism is built on. It posits that reality is shaped by people's ideas in their brains. This leads to all sorts of horrifying stuff:
|
||
| 2 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
Idealism is not a slur, but the philosophy that liberalism is built on. It posits that reality is shaped by people's ideas in their brains. This leads to all sorts of horrifying stuff: People try to make their lies reality by trying to force other people to believe them. People dehumanize people who disagree with them since only human's ideas are the ones that supposedly shape reality. Whenever...
united states people using ai... what could go wrong |
||
| 1 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
"Idealism is not relevant to this discussion" proceeds to use purely idealist arguments
You clearly wouldn't know an ideal if you walked into one. Set your bar a little higher. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
OilyArena
lemmy.ml
OilyArena@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-02-17 |
You clearly wouldn't know an ideal if you walked into one. Set your bar a little higher.
You should maybe learn the meaning of words before trying to use them, idealism does not mean "having ideals". Idealism is the counterpart to materialism, and has been explained to you in another comment. But sure, that's one way to respond, I guess. |
||
| 0 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
You should maybe learn the meaning of words before trying to use them, idealism does not mean "having ideals". Idealism is the counterpart to materialism, and has been explained to you in another comment. But sure, that's one way to respond, I guess.
"You should maybe learn the meaning of words before trying to use them" ironic, but no one expects logic, or honesty from aiholes |
||
| 0 | |||
|
OilyArena
lemmy.ml
OilyArena@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-02-17 |
"You should maybe learn the meaning of words before trying to use them" ironic, but no one expects logic, or honesty from aiholes
I mean the distinction is something you learn in secondary school usually, I really can't help you there, but you can keep throwing your strange little hissy fit if you want. |
||
| 1 | |||
Libre Extremist
lemmy.ml
liberatedGuy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2022-01-25 |
China is an imperialist force in East Asia According to western media, thinktanks and commentators comfortably sitting and circlejerking in the imperial core, yes. It is destroying every non-Han culture and religious expression within the CCP controlled areas. Easily disproved by random travel bloggers that travel China e.g. Xinjiang and Tibet
No. They may be dishonest, but that doesn't mean they will have to lie about every single thing. And it is not just westerners, but also South Koreans, Japanese and SEAsians too.
Carefully chosen and curated. Why is Chinese Muslim content only food and never religious sermons? Where are the Christians preaching their beliefs? Where are the children studying the Quran and the Bible? |
||
| 1 | |||
|
ffhein
lemmy.world
fhein@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-14 |
Also Google destroyed a huge chunk of Swedish forest to build a data centers for more AI.... That's the main feature of AI. Figure that one out.
*Finnish forest It's Palantir (or maybe it was just of one of the founders?) that bought a large chunk of land in Sweden, but to my knowledge they haven't made their plans for what to do with public |
||
| 3 | |||
KimBongUn420
lemmy.ml
KimBongUn420@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-07-05 |
According to western media, thinktanks and commentators comfortably sitting and circlejerking in the imperial core, yes. No. They may be dishonest, but that doesn't mean they will have to lie about every single thing. And it is not just westerners, but also South Koreans, Japanese and SEAsians too. Easily disproved by random travel bloggers that travel China e.g. Xinjiang and Tibet Carefully ch...
Ok
You're aware Xinjiang has one of the highest amount of Mosques per capita right? Here's further reading on the sub
|
||
| -1 | |||
|
m532
lemmy.ml
m532@lemmy.ml Joined: 2021-06-05 |
united states people using ai... what could go wrong
Seems like you replied to the wrong comment |
||
| 2 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
Seems like you replied to the wrong comment
Your spelling suggests otherwise |
||
| 1 | |||
|
emergencyfood
sh.itjust.works
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-03 |
Unfortunately the proof found by the LLM combines work by different teams of mathematicians that cannot individually be published as proofs. It's the equivalent of a scoop in investigation journalism by someone who was spying on journalists instead of doing any investigating. It's on lemmy/wired: https://lemmy.world/post/52843754 It's good that some do cite sources, however one major problem wi...
From what I understood from that article, OpenAI scooped the work of a couple of mathematicians (one an OpenAI employee, and both using OpenAI's tools) and claimed it as their own. Stealing others' work is not commonplace in science, but it does happen. The lesson here is to not trust OpenAI / Anthropic with your data or ideas, and to use local AI or at least less shady services. Also, the mathematicians will still get credit if they publish the findings first in a scientific journal, arXiv or conference - blogs and press releases sadly don't count in academia. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
OilyArena
lemmy.ml
OilyArena@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-02-17 |
Your spelling suggests otherwise
Wtf are you on about? Did you have a stroke? |
||
| 1 | |||
Libre Extremist
lemmy.ml
liberatedGuy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2022-01-25 |
No it is not just westerners Names western aligned vassal states Ok Asks questions because they are uninformed You're aware Xinjiang has one of the highest amount of Mosques per capita right? Here's further reading on the sub What's going on with the Uyghurs / Xinjiang province? XinJiang: Facts vs Fiction. Debuking America’s slopaganda about the Uyghurs in China A Pakistani Diplomat given full ...
Link dump doesn't answer my questions. Most of these are irrelevant anyway. Show me videos of Chinese Muslims preaching their religion openly in the mosques. Show me videos of Uyghur Muslims openly praying Eid. Show me videos of Christians in China preaching their religion. Why is Chinese Muslim content only about food and old mosques? Where are the newer mosques? Where are the preachers outside of Hong Kong? You did the exact same thing that Zionists do when they get cornered. "Arabs in IDF", "Look Arabic singposts in Tel Aviv", "Hamaas is terrorists" etc. No real difference. |
||
| -1 | |||
|
GeorgimusPrime
lemmy.world
GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-14 |
From what I understood from that article, OpenAI scooped the work of a couple of mathematicians (one an OpenAI employee, and both using OpenAI's tools) and claimed it as their own. Stealing others' work is not commonplace in science, but it does happen. The lesson here is to not trust OpenAI / Anthropic with your data or ideas, and to use local AI or at least less shady services. Also, the math...
You still seem to missing a lot of the story. Open AI published several hundred articles in scientific journals claiming to solve maths problems. At my last count they had retracted 3. If you would like to downplay the scale of theft and unethical behaviour enabled and perpetrated by OpenAI by calling the scientists naive or saying it's acceptable because it happens, that's your right. Perhaps you could just say what would convince you that something bad and dangerous for human scientific progress is happening. |
||
| 1 | |||
KimBongUn420
lemmy.ml
KimBongUn420@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-07-05 |
Link dump doesn't answer my questions. Most of these are irrelevant anyway. Show me videos of Chinese Muslims preaching their religion openly in the mosques. Show me videos of Uyghur Muslims openly praying Eid. Show me videos of Christians in China preaching their religion. Why is Chinese Muslim content only about food and old mosques? Where are the newer mosques? Where are the preachers outsid...
Took me literally a single query: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRUZcrSUDVc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moADAgQFCuA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYMADibMY4Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4vBJtioHrQ If netanyahu would do the same what the CPC did in Xinjiang as a response to terror, he'd get a Nobel peace price (vocational school, teach mandarin, give full citizenship) |
||
| 1 | |||
Libre Extremist
lemmy.ml
liberatedGuy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2022-01-25 |
Took me literally a single query: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRUZcrSUDVc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moADAgQFCuA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYMADibMY4Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4vBJtioHrQ If netanyahu would do the same what the CPC did in Xinjiang as a response to terror, he'd get a Nobel peace price (vocational school, teach mandarin, give full citizenship)
[removed by moderator]
|
||
| 0 | |||
KimBongUn420
lemmy.ml
KimBongUn420@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-07-05 |
[removed by moderator]
Quite the goal post move
Sounds like cope when presented with something that contradics your ideology.
I question your intelligence when you side with the ETIM terroritst organisation as designated by the UN, EU and even at one point by the US (until they realized they can fund them in order to destabilize their geopolitical enemy) |
||
| 1 | |||
|
emergencyfood
sh.itjust.works
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-03 |
You still seem to missing a lot of the story. Open AI published several hundred articles in scientific journals claiming to solve maths problems. At my last count they had retracted 3. If you would like to downplay the scale of theft and unethical behaviour enabled and perpetrated by OpenAI by calling the scientists naive or saying it's acceptable because it happens, that's your right. Perhaps ...
No, they published them on GitHub. Meaning they aren't peer-reviewed. In the current scientific system, peer review is almost always necessary for your work to be taken seriously. If the original authors can get their work published first, they still get precedence. Plus, there have been a number of cases where X discovers and publishes something, Y rediscovers and publishes it a few years later, and Y gets the credit for whatever reason (usually racism or money). The scientists were naive to hand over their ideas to a shady closed-source model. I don't think what OpenAI did is acceptable, but it is something that already happens without any LLM involvement, so I'm just not as shocked as you are. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
GeorgimusPrime
lemmy.world
GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-14 |
No, they published them on GitHub. Meaning they aren't peer-reviewed. In the current scientific system, peer review is almost always necessary for your work to be taken seriously. If the original authors can get their work published first, they still get precedence. Plus, there have been a number of cases where X discovers and publishes something, Y rediscovers and publishes it a few years late...
Being published on Github makes it not as bad, though it seems the intent is for the peer review to happen there. In at least some cases, the mathematicians shared their work with OpenAI researchers asking to collaborate. I'll accept your acknowledgment that it's bad and ignore the irrelevant dig about being shocked. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
emergencyfood
sh.itjust.works
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-03 |
Being published on Github makes it not as bad, though it seems the intent is for the peer review to happen there. I also don't think I need to point out the harm in forcing people to publish before they are ready by stealing their work. In at least some cases, the mathematicians shared their work with OpenAI researchers asking to collaborate. I'll accept your acknowledgment that it's bad and ig...
That's not how this works! That's not how any of this works! You submit to some journal, who sends your work to 2-3 other scientists in the field (often anonymously, to reduce bias). There are cases of scientists ignoring journals and just posting their results to repositaries like arXiv, but that's the exception rather than the rule. Anyway, GitHub is not an acceptable place to publish your findings, since it allows you to make changes later on.
That, again, is an issue that existed long before LLMs. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
GeorgimusPrime
lemmy.world
GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-14 |
it seems the intent is for the peer review to happen there That's not how this works! That's not how any of this works! You submit to some journal, who sends your work to 2-3 other scientists in the field (often anonymously, to reduce bias). There are cases of scientists ignoring journals and just posting their results to repositaries like arXiv, but that's the exception rather than the rule. A...
I know that's not how it's supposed to happen. But the Github repository is getting attention and review, like this: https://kingy.ai/blog/openai-math-722-manuscripts-results-proofs-compute-costs/ I still don't get if you're still trying to excuse something bad and getting worse due to AI by saying it was always happening. I have acknowledged that it was happening. |
||
| 1 | |||
Libre Extremist
lemmy.ml
liberatedGuy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2022-01-25 |
It is destroying every non-Han culture and religious expression within the CCP controlled areas. The first one is from China mainland, not Uyghuristan. Quite the goal post move Yes, China does keep a few tokens here and there to whitewash its image. Sounds like cope when presented with something that contradics your ideology. The very fact that you would call response to occupation and cultural...
Again, all you have is my lack of articulation and not the problem itself. Typical Western(ised) moron. Terrorist? Yeah, brown people should have no agency. Exactly the speech used by Zios to demonise Arabs. |
||
| 0 | |||
KimBongUn420
lemmy.ml
KimBongUn420@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-07-05 |
Again, all you have is my lack of articulation and not the problem itself. Typical Western(ised) moron. Terrorist? Yeah, brown people should have no agency. Exactly the speech used by Zios to demonise Arabs.
It's your lack of critical thinking. Your ideologically confused
Typical liberal that only focuses on identity politics and completely disregards class politics and imperialism. Agency is of course when the US gives you diplomatic support and utilizes you to destabilize their geopolitical enemy /s
When you compare what the China does in Xinjiang with what the Zios are doing in Gaza/middle east your doing a form genocide denial dipshit |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 2 of 2
Goto page
« First
Previous
1, 2
Back to top |