I think I saw that one.

I care, in that OF is far less harmful than people who got rich off Bitcoin, OpenAI, Nestle, etc..

believe it or not,

right in the bussyness.

onlyfans has that too for premium subscribers.

you mean like how governments are dependent on tax payer participation in the workforce to generate income for the state by enslaving them for less than livable wages all so the GDP can be propped up like a bad weekend at bernie's skit?

yeah, we should stop participating in our own enslavement and force our governments to provide minimum basic needs like clean water, healthcare, access to education, and others.

how can one do that though...I suppose the best way would be to bring attention to the core issues and force the government to actively participate with the citizens it governs in order to save face after being publicly humiliated by opening a school with the money you earned as a porn star.

nah, that's just stupid. no way that would work. right?

It's insane for me how people are seriously inept to see some nuance. Only fans as a platform makes it money from exploiting young people (mostly girls). Pornography (essentially legal prostitution) as a whole harms a lot of the population's perception of sexual activity and sexual desires, alongside creating a pyramid of systematic exploitation of young women. It's the ultimate liberal slop that has been normalized because these people are working for their money!

Anyways, it's not about her, but about how she could not find any other outlet to collect money to build that school. She is a brave soul, but that doesn't make this story less sad.

Why not both?

Well that was patronising.

I can imagine religious folk might have problem with this

Don't care about patronizing or not. Only fans and similar businesses do make their money from exploitation. I won't listen to someone defending gambling and betting companies, I won't listen to someone cry wolf about only fans either.