| Post Reply | RetroFed Forums Forum Index » Today I Learned |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
TwoTiredMice
feddit.dk
TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk Joined: 2025-12-25 |
I might be stupid by not knowing this, but I suddenly got an item on my bucket list. |
||
| 265 Original | |||
|
PattyMcB
lemmy.world
PattyMcB@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-02-12 |
And there's typically three (triple rainbow), you just can't usually see all three. |
||
| 40 | |||
|
espentan
lemmy.world
espentan@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-02 |
And there's typically three (triple rainbow), you just can't usually see all three.
Triple? What does it mean?! |
||
| 39 | |||
|
PattyMcB
lemmy.world
PattyMcB@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-02-12 |
Triple? What does it mean?!
Water refracts light according to science! |
||
| 23 | |||
Th4tGuyII
fedia.io
Th4tGuyII@fedia.ioJoined: 2024-06-11 |
Yeah, it's wild that the bulk result of all the droplets in a system individually refracting the White light is essentially a uniform macroscopic refraction as though it had gone through some kind of super droplet. Edit: Refraction not defraction |
||
| 23 | |||
|
ieightpi
lemmy.world
ieightpi@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-26 |
Sun dog are kind of related aren't they? |
||
| 5 | |||
|
Godort
lemmy.ca
Godort@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-06-04 |
This is interesting, but what I want to know is what shape they would be if water droplets were not round. Like, if they were cuboid or pyramidal instead, would that change the shape of the rainbow? |
||
| 9 | |||
|
kettuli
lemmy.world
kettuli@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-15 |
And there's typically three (triple rainbow), you just can't usually see all three.
Theoretically infinite rainbows. |
||
| 11 | |||
JoeBigelow
lemmy.ca
JoeBigelow@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-07-06 |
Sun dog are kind of related aren't they?
Yes, sundogs occur at a certain point of the arc, and usually closer in to the sun |
||
| 4 | |||
0xDREADBEEF
lemmy.dbzer0.com
dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2024-12-18 |
arent they actually cones? and we just see a segment of that cone which appears as (half of) a ring? |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Suck_on_my_Presence
lemmy.world
Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-07 |
Triple? What does it mean?!
Triple rainbow, oh my gawd! |
||
| 11 | |||
|
Skyrmir
lemmy.world
Skyrmir@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-02 |
Look at the moon on a misty night, you'll see the full circle around it. Kinda tricky to have the right Moon and weather at the same time though. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Thorry
feddit.org
Thorry@feddit.org Joined: 2025-08-30 |
Also: The rainbow you see depends on your position. So a different position yields a different rainbow, even tho it's the same source of light and the same bulk refraction. It isn't like there actually is some kind of physical thing in the sky we see, it's just the light being refracted into our eyes. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
dream_weasel
sh.itjust.works
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-06-30 |
This is interesting, but what I want to know is what shape they would be if water droplets were not round. Like, if they were cuboid or pyramidal instead, would that change the shape of the rainbow?
Probably not. I would think the more likely outcome is either a very patchy rainbow or none at all. The sphere shape is what is giving you the continuous rainbow, not making it circular. The fact that each color is at a specified angle relative to you / the incidence angle of sunlight does that part. |
||
| 6 | |||
|
MacAnus
sh.itjust.works
MacAnus@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-09-10 |
This is interesting, but what I want to know is what shape they would be if water droplets were not round. Like, if they were cuboid or pyramidal instead, would that change the shape of the rainbow?
Great question, I never thought of that. |
||
| 2 | |||
Rhaedas
fedia.io
Rhaedas@fedia.ioJoined: 2024-03-03 |
Veritasium did |
||
| 5 | |||
|
FishFace
piefed.social
FishFace@piefed.social Joined: 2025-10-16 |
Yeah, it's wild that the bulk result of all the droplets in a system individually refracting the White light is essentially a uniform macroscopic refraction as though it had gone through some kind of super droplet. Physics does some cool stuff sometimes! Edit: Refraction not defraction
The main components of a rainbow are formed by refraction, not diffraction. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
FishFace
piefed.social
FishFace@piefed.social Joined: 2025-10-16 |
Look at the moon on a misty night, you'll see the full circle around it. Kinda tricky to have the right Moon and weather at the same time though.
That is going to be a halo though - a different (but not unrelated) optical phenomenon! |
||
| 4 | |||
|
FishFace
piefed.social
FishFace@piefed.social Joined: 2025-10-16 |
This is interesting, but what I want to know is what shape they would be if water droplets were not round. Like, if they were cuboid or pyramidal instead, would that change the shape of the rainbow?
It would produce a completely different effect. Ice crystals, which tend to be hexagonal prisms, produce some atmospheric optical effects and they can be a variety of shapes. |
||
| 4 | |||
x00z
lemmy.world
x00z@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-07-26 |
I have seen full circles and doubles. It's very beautiful. I also like that the background inside of a rainbow is often a different color than the background around it. A cool thing happened a few weeks ago though. I saw the ends of the rainbow IN FRONT of the trees that were only 100m away. And when we drove past those trees it was in front of the next bunch of trees. Maybe it was just my eyes deceiving me, or maybe a rainbow only exists in the eyes of the beholder. Never saw that before. |
||
| 11 | |||
PrimeErective
startrek.website
PrimeErective@startrek.websiteJoined: 2023-08-25 |
I saw a full rainbow from a plane once. It was sick |
||
| 7 | |||
|
GreenKnight23
lemmy.world
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-09-21 |
I saw a full rainbow from a plane once. It was sick
I saw one in the mountains when ice crystals were floating in the air on a sunny day. it was actually a septuple rainbow. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
ominous ocelot
leminal.space
probable_possum@leminal.space Joined: 2025-08-14 |
Also: there is no pot of gold if there is no end of the rainbow. Let this sink in for a moment. |
||
| 18 | |||
illi
sh.itjust.works
illi@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-07-02 |
Water refracts light according to science!
Across the sky? |
||
| 6 | |||
|
PattyMcB
lemmy.world
PattyMcB@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-02-12 |
Across the sky?
I really hope you're kidding |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Joined: 2023-12-08 |
I really hope you're kidding
@PattyMcB @illi Here? With the caliber of people I know? Almost certainly a joke.We eat ignoramuses for lunch on the fediverse. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
BradleyUffner
lemmy.world
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-11 |
Also: The rainbow you see depends on your position. So a different position yields a different rainbow, even tho it's the same source of light and the same bulk refraction. It isn't like there actually is some kind of physical thing in the sky we see, it's just the light being refracted into our eyes.
Yep. The one you see is actually just a 2d slice of a complex overlapping structure of light within a cylinder. It's really fascinating. |
||
| 6 | |||
illi
sh.itjust.works
illi@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-07-02 |
I really hope you're kidding
It's a reference |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Armok_the_bunny
lemmy.world
Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-21 |
And there's typically three (triple rainbow), you just can't usually see all three.
Aren't there actually 5, with the other two being on the opposite side of the viewer from the main 3? |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Armok_the_bunny
lemmy.world
Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-21 |
I have seen full circles and doubles. It's very beautiful. I also like that the background inside of a rainbow is often a different color than the background around it. A cool thing happened a few weeks ago though. I saw the ends of the rainbow IN FRONT of the trees that were only 100m away. And when we drove past those trees it was in front of the next bunch of trees. Maybe it was just my eyes...
What I believe that means is that the mist that formed the rainbow was between you and the trees in question. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
purplemonkeymad
programming.dev
purplemonkeymad@programming.dev Joined: 2023-08-08 |
Aren't there actually 5, with the other two being on the opposite side of the viewer from the main 3?
I don't think there is a limit, it's just that each one is significantly less visible. It's all to do with the number of bounces within the rain drop. IIRC rings 1 and 4 are towards the sun. In cold climates you can also get sun halos where the position depends on the shape of the ice crystals in the air. |
||
| 6 | |||
|
purplemonkeymad
programming.dev
purplemonkeymad@programming.dev Joined: 2023-08-08 |
This is interesting, but what I want to know is what shape they would be if water droplets were not round. Like, if they were cuboid or pyramidal instead, would that change the shape of the rainbow?
Ice crystals are not round and they create different patterns depending on the shape they take. Look up sun halos. There is even a specific one called a sun dog. |
||
| 3 | |||
qevlarr
lemmy.world
qevlarr@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-18 |
Let me share that famous MIT lecture on rainbows again: https://youtu.be/iKUSWJWMSk4 |
||
| 0 | |||
Th4tGuyII
fedia.io
Th4tGuyII@fedia.ioJoined: 2024-06-11 |
The main components of a rainbow are formed by refraction, not diffraction.
Oops, you're right, got my words mixed up haha |
||
| 3 | |||
|
tiramichu
sh.itjust.works
tiramichu@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2025-06-04 |
This is one of those weird things where our perception is dictated by our cultural biases. If you were an intelligent alien coming to earth for the first time from a planet with no rainbows, you'd see one and think "Oh, what an interesting phenomenon! A circular refraction partially obscured by the ground!" - because of course there's no way that kind of optical phenomenon could be anything other than completely symmetrical. It's obvious if you think about it. But as a human, right from being a child every single portrayal of a rainbow has them as an arc, and we were never given reason to think about it from an analytical perspective. So we never did. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Duamerthrax
lemmy.world
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-27 |
Also: there is no pot of gold if there is no end of the rainbow. Let this sink in for a moment.
Only because there's no end to it. Leprechauns didn't want you to know that. |
||
| 4 | |||
moldy_rice
piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.comJoined: 2026-08-07 |
So where's the gold then? |
||
| 1 | |||
|
frunch
lemmy.world
frunch@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
My first encounter with this concept was playing Katamari Damacy. Once you've gotten big enough to roll up the rainbow, you get to see it's a full circle β π |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Jomega
lemmy.world
Jomega@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-12 |
You can see this for yourself if you have one of those hoses with the multiple nozzle settings. I forget which setting I had it on, but I blew my own mind seeing a rainbow ring messing around with one as a kid. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
Strider
lemmy.world
Strider@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-09 |
So where's the gold then?
The same story as with climbing the corporate ladder, which is a hamster wheel. (No gold, too bad) |
||
| 5 | |||
|
PattyMcB
lemmy.world
PattyMcB@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-02-12 |
It's a reference Original video
16 years ago. No wonder i didn't get it! |
||
| 1 | |||
illi
sh.itjust.works
illi@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-07-02 |
16 years ago. No wonder i didn't get it!
This comment hurt a little :D |
||
| 4 | |||
|
cynar
lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-17 |
Triple? What does it mean?!
It's related to the number of total internal reflections inside a raindrop. The 2nd rainbow is actually inverted, colour wise. The 3rd inverts again, and so is normal. Each reflection loses more light however, so it gets dimmer. 3 is the practical limit in the sky, with our eyes. In the lab version, at least 18 rainbows can be detected, even by undergraduate level students! |
||
| 3 | |||
|
cynar
lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-17 |
Theoretically infinite rainbows.
Not infinite. Eventually they begin to overlap and are no longer distinct rainbows. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
PattyMcB
lemmy.world
PattyMcB@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-02-12 |
This comment hurt a little :D
Sorry. If it helps, I was around 3,000 years ago... when we still used dial-up to access bbs's |
||
| 2 | |||
|
dogdeanafternoon
lemmy.ca
dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-10-18 |
It's related to the number of total internal reflections inside a raindrop. The 2nd rainbow is actually inverted, colour wise. The 3rd inverts again, and so is normal. Each reflection loses more light however, so it gets dimmer. 3 is the practical limit in the sky, with our eyes. In the lab version, at least 18 rainbows can be detected, even by undergraduate level students!
Ok this is crazy. I have a picture I took a few years ago of a double rainbow. Never noticed it was inverted, but I went to look and sure enough it is. Now Iβm wondering how I didnβt notice before. |
||
| 2 | |||
πΈπππ
infosec.pub
01189998819991197253@infosec.pubJoined: 2023-06-04 |
This type of misinformation is exactly what I would expect from the leprechaun. "It's a circle, no need to search for the gold, move along". Nice try, I'm not buying it! |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |