I'm one of those rare ducks that is pro-union no matter the circumstance.

Or at least I can't think of one where I'd be against a union.

No one requested a "debate me bro" right winger here, or an egomaniac who wants to "not all men" the general topic, which goes beyond you.

Chill.

People disagree on the internet. It's not your internet and it's not my internet. You can make up whatever names you want for me, but it makes no difference. If you talk to me, I'll often respond.

You say you want me to shut up and leave, but here you are continuing to talk to me. You say nobody requested me here, but I didn't request you either.

If you don't want to debate, don't debate. It's that simple. You just want to check out and pivot to ad hominem now because your arguments generally fell flat on their faces.

Whether you come to the table for a discussion like a civilized adult or throw your mashed potatoes all over the floor in a tantrum, both are interesting as well as entertaining and I'll keep replying to your responses.

Did I say -everything- cops do protects the ruling class? Do you think think I was saying that when a cop eats cereal in the morning or beats his wife, he's protecting the ruling class?

Speaking of protecting the ruling class and child abuse, why are you guys not going after the folks on Epstein's list again?

You said it was their "role in society." That's pretty broad.

If you stepped on a bug last month, would you say your "role in society" is to kill animals? What about if you ate meat?

If you bought a smartphone (or anything else) made in a sweatshop, bought an avocado, or bought chocolate, would you say your "role in society" is to support slavery and murder?