I'm willing to discuss it anywhere.

I await your invitation. Just make a thread somewhere with decent moderation and tag me.

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/77100398

@objection@lemmy.ml I think this is the second time I've posted a comment of yours there lol

Responded

It's worth mentioning that I said

I know what you're trying to say here

and that I did not call you an ableist (though it's possible someone else has), I only said it's an ableist way to make your point.

You don't need to get defensive and say it wasn't your intention. If I believed it was your intention, I wouldn't have said I understand the point you're trying to make. I don't think apologizing with phrases like that is a good look, but in the interest of trying to nip things in the bud, I'll preemptively say I didn't feel owed an apology. Also I'll explicitly mention that I am not one of the ones suggesting to not vote for people who don't take a strong stance against genocide (apart from primaries).

I was only trying to say there's a better way to phrase that particular part of your message.

Ok, all good, I get your point and take it on board. Sorry for saying sorry.

Haven’t been called canadian in a while.

You're okay, I totally get it, a lot of people here are being hyper critical, it is easy to get on the defensive. Especially online where there's no time of voice to go off of.

I’m tired of shitlibs complaining that everyone isn’t supporting vote blue no matter who and pushing electorialism.

posts about how mediocre the candidates opposing the republican candidate.

I don't even care for GC, but I post about this because if candidates are mediocre how can they be seen as real opposition? Why is having demands of candidates a bad thing?

Browbeating people critical of democrats might feel cathartic for you but it's just enabling the worst behaviors from candidates. Like for example the number of democrats who decided to go anti trans after winning their primary.

Lol hello this is exactly the type of thing I was warning about recently.

So much this!! Happens every election and is very annoying.

My comments were removed and I was banned (again) for pointing out that Talarico went on to say that Netanyahu doesn't have a right to wage war on civilians, that the violence in Gaza needs to end, that we should support Palestine as much as we can, and we should come to a two-state solution that gives Palestinians self-determinance.

We say the same thing all the time and every few years they act shocked and pretend we’re all Russian bots.

Frequently wrong, never in doubt.

Never-hillary got us trump in the first place.

No, Hillary being an unpopular candidate, that ran on terrible policies, after Obama screwing over his voting base is what got us Trump the first time.

...a very radical agenda...

So being against genocide is a "radical agenda"?

...they most likely don’t even care about zionism or the palestinian genocide.

Do you have any evidence of this?

They just want to keep trump in power.

Ah yes, it couldn't possibly be that they want both the pro-genocide parties to lose. It has to be one or the other: Thats The American Way

kingofras this isn't !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works. This is PTB, you keep not following rule 0, at this point it's BPR.
!manufacturingconsent@lemmy.ml is a /c/ to discuss haw people manufacture consent, positive or negative. It's about discovering how we are not immune to propaganda, and how many easily fall for it.

make a !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world 🧵 if you're serious about discussing a Texan election. This instance is anti electoralism, because we comprehend demagoguery. Americans, more than 80%, don't.

cc @geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

Hilary supported the trump primary run

Hilary got us trump