RetroFed Forums
Your home away from modern life.
Four is 6 7 for infosec
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
CombatWombat feddit.online CombatWombat@feddit.online
Joined: 2025-09-09
Quote

via

712   Original
burgermeister sh.itjust.works burgermeister@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-10
#2 · Quote Reply

Pretty sneaky, sys!(admin)

8
🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞 lemmy.world daychilde@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#3 · Quote Reply

Oof. I hope the 4 thing dies out quicker than the 6 7 thing did. lol.

I'm upvoting them all today because it's still fresh, even though I'm already over it. But yeah, dunno about after today. lol.

37
Ooops feddit.org Ooops@feddit.org
Joined: 2024-07-06
#4 · Quote Reply

Do we get a new number of the day tomorrow after having worn out 4? 😆

14
pipe01 programming.dev pipe01@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-12-20
#5 · Quote Reply

Oof. I hope the 4 thing dies out quicker than the 6 7 thing did. lol. I'm upvoting them all today because it's still fresh, even though I'm already over it. But yeah, dunno about after today. lol.

Ironically, I've seen four of these memes in a row in my feed

22
c0wboy dani lemmy.dbzer0.com nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-02-17
#6 · Quote Reply

what is this referring to? not in infosec at all lol

14
Janx piefed.social Janx@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-12-19
#7 · Quote Reply

Ironically, "four" is a much better password than a single character.

29
meat lemmy.blahaj.zone meat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2026-08-07
#8 · Quote Reply

Ironically, "four" is a much better password than a single character.

Not hugely. A single word dictionary attack is still a very low bar.

16
🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞 lemmy.world daychilde@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#9 · Quote Reply

Ironically, I've seen four of these memes in a row in my feed

I've seen at least six to seven or so. heh

20
defrostedLasagna4921 piefed.zip defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip
Joined: 2026-01-09
#10 · Quote Reply

Oof. I hope the 4 thing dies out quicker than the 6 7 thing did. lol. I'm upvoting them all today because it's still fresh, even though I'm already over it. But yeah, dunno about after today. lol.

At least it has an actual meaning, unlike 67.

23
nehal3m lemmy.zip nehal3m@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-04-14
#11 · Quote Reply

what is this referring to? not in infosec at all lol

The headline is:
One of the private keys protecting part of the global HTTPS trust system was, according to a report from The Register published October 20, 2026, the number 4. Not a 384-bit cryptographic value. Just the digit 4.

More info here:
https://tech-insider.org/emudhra-ca-private-keys-compromised-number-4-2026/

44
Alexstarfire lemmy.world Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-06
#12 · Quote Reply

I've seen at least six to seven or so. heh

14
Jolteon lemmy.zip Jolteon@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2023-10-25
#13 · Quote Reply

Not hugely. A single word dictionary attack is still a very low bar.

Hey, it'll at least save a few more microseconds.

10
Successful_Try543 feddit.org Successful_Try543@feddit.org
Joined: 2024-06-22
#14 · Quote Reply

Do we get a new number of the day tomorrow after having worn out 4? 😆

The next one will be 6. As it's a perfect number there isn't any further improvement possible.

11
🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞 lemmy.world daychilde@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#15 · Quote Reply

I watched that around six or seven times ;-)

3
diaphragmwp discuss.tchncs.de diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2026-06-03
#16 · (edited) Quote Reply

"connect port;  this whole network is fucked man""connect fork into the fucking wall socket"

27
diaphragmwp discuss.tchncs.de diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2026-06-03
#17 · Quote Reply

The headline is: One of the private keys protecting part of the global HTTPS trust system was, according to a report from The Register published October 20, 2026, the number 4. Not a 384-bit cryptographic value. Just the digit 4. More info here: https://tech-insider.org/emudhra-ca-private-keys-compromised-number-4-2026/

To be precise, it was 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:04

19
Ooops feddit.org Ooops@feddit.org
Joined: 2024-07-06
#18 · Quote Reply

The next one will be 6. As it's a perfect number there isn't any further improvement possible.

I'm voting for 2 as the oddest prime.

4
captainlezbian lemmy.world captainlezbian@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-29
#19 · Quote Reply

To be precise, it was 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:04

To be fair, that is a potential random value

5
MelodiousFunk lemmy.zip MelodiousFunk@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-07
#20 · Quote Reply

::: spoiler NSFW

:::

14
Anas lemmy.world anas@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-11
#21 · Quote Reply

I miss connect 4 memes

1
BradleyUffner lemmy.world BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-11
#22 · Quote Reply

The way his fist is raised, and the way she is covering her eye, kind of make it look like he just punched her in the face.

2
zqwzzle lemmy.ca zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-07
#23 · Quote Reply

To be precise, it was 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:04

Wow someone actually took that xkcd comic seriously.

1
Post Reply
Back to top