| Post Reply | RetroFed Forums Forum Index » Firefox |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
My home page is blank. I only have adblock and noscript. I want firefox to not access google - ever. I find it infuritating actually. |
||
| 44 Original | |||
|
ComradeMiao
lemmy.world
ComradeMiao@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-10 |
You lost zero info for how you think it’s connecting…? |
||
| -1 | |||
DreamButt
lemmy.world
tdawg@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-16 |
I'm not sure about in Firefox directly but if you use a local dns or similar you could have Google resolve to nothing |
||
| 3 | |||
bazzett
lemmy.world
bazzett@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
At your own risk, disable Safe Browsing. And add all Google domains to the blacklist of uBlock Origin. Or you can simply switch to LibreWolf and go on with your life. |
||
| 23 | |||
|
hoppolito
mander.xyz
hoppolito@mander.xyz Joined: 2024-11-23 |
How did you figure out you are establishing a connection to google? Wireshark or similar? Does it happen specifically as you open Firefox, or what do you mean with keeping ‘a connection permanently’? Which endpoint is it trying to reach? I feel these are important details before people can help you out. |
||
| 27 | |||
CountVon
sh.itjust.works
CountVon@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-12 |
At your own risk, disable Safe Browsing. And add all Google domains to the blacklist of uBlock Origin. Or you can simply switch to LibreWolf and go on with your life.
Yes, Google Safe Browsing is probably the cause. Anyone curious can read more about it here, but that traffic at browser startup is probably going to Google's Safe Browsing API servers. |
||
| 15 | |||
|
grue
lemmy.world
grue@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
At your own risk, disable Safe Browsing. And add all Google domains to the blacklist of uBlock Origin. Or you can simply switch to LibreWolf and go on with your life.
|
||
| 3 | |||
|
Sir Arthur V Quackington
lemmy.world
ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-30 |
DNS over HTTPS could be using the Google DNS services. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
Goodlucksil
lemmy.dbzer0.com
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2025-08-15 |
$ sudo apt install librewolf [sudo: authenticate] Password: Error: Unable to locate package librewolf
(https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/)
|
||
| 7 | |||
|
grue
lemmy.world
grue@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
(https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/) We have a repository for Debian-based distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, etc.), with which you can easily install and update LibreWolf. To add it to your system and install LibreWolf, run the following commands one by one: sudo apt update && sudo apt install extrepo -y sudo extrepo enable librewolf && sudo extrepo update librewolf s...
I don't want to have to "taint" my distro install by adding a repo. I want it to be available from my distro's official repo. |
||
| -15 | |||
|
ivn
tarte.nuage-libre.fr
ivn@tarte.nuage-libre.fr Joined: 2025-09-22 |
I don't want to have to "taint" my distro install by adding a repo. I want it to be available from my distro's official repo.
Adding a repo is not "tainting" an install. Adding a package to the official repo is not the responsibility of the devs but of Debian's package maintainers. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
Goodlucksil
lemmy.dbzer0.com
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2025-08-15 |
I don't want to have to "taint" my distro install by adding a repo. I want it to be available from my distro's official repo.
You could try the AppImage or the flatpak. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
HubertManne
piefed.social
HubertManne@piefed.social Joined: 2025-03-13 |
I don't want to have to "taint" my distro install by adding a repo. I want it to be available from my distro's official repo.
are you sure its librewolf that makes the call of whats in your distros official repo? |
||
| 2 | |||
HotsauceHurricane
lemmy.world
HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.worldJoined: 2025-05-13 |
I don't want to have to "taint" my distro install by adding a repo. I want it to be available from my distro's official repo.
Nothing tainted about it. It's actually one of the easiest ways to get a package you want/need. I appreciate anyone who maintains my precious librewolf package. |
||
| 10 | |||
|
grue
lemmy.world
grue@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
Adding a repo is not "tainting" an install. Adding a package to the official repo is not the responsibility of the devs but of Debian's package maintainers.
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian Anyway, the bottom line is that if LibreWolf folks want more people to use their software, then one of them ought to become a Debian package maintainer for that package. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
grue
lemmy.world
grue@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
are you sure its librewolf that makes the call of whats in your distros official repo?
Of course not; it's the distro that makes the call. But I want the Librewolf folks to make the effort to get accepted by the distro. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
ivn
tarte.nuage-libre.fr
ivn@tarte.nuage-libre.fr Joined: 2025-09-22 |
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian Anyway, the bottom line is that if LibreWolf folks want more people to use their software, then one of them ought to become a Debian package maintainer for that package.
The only relevant part in that link is this:
And you should be safe about this. As I was saying, the devs are not responsible for including the package to the official repo. You are owed nothing and have plenty of other options to install it. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
ivn
tarte.nuage-libre.fr
ivn@tarte.nuage-libre.fr Joined: 2025-09-22 |
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian Anyway, the bottom line is that if LibreWolf folks want more people to use their software, then one of them ought to become a Debian package maintainer for that package.
As for your bottom line remember the contributors are working on it for free, they are not selling anything. So they are not running after more users. It's good as it is, non technical people can use flatpack or AppImage and technical people can add a repo without issues. And someday someone could add it to the official repo, it could be you. |
||
| 1 | |||
Hewert Hurggles
thelemmy.club
Albin067@thelemmy.clubJoined: 2026-03-07 |
At your own risk, disable Safe Browsing. And add all Google domains to the blacklist of uBlock Origin. Or you can simply switch to LibreWolf and go on with your life.
LibreWolf can't be a convenient daily driver. Need tweaks and tweaking default settings may reduce privacy and security slightly. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
At your own risk, disable Safe Browsing. And add all Google domains to the blacklist of uBlock Origin. Or you can simply switch to LibreWolf and go on with your life.
Hmm, I will try the LibreWolf - will also try disabling safe browsing. Thanks for the info! |
||
| 3 | |||
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
I'm not sure about in Firefox directly but if you use a local dns or similar you could have Google resolve to nothing
True |
||
| 2 | |||
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
DNS over HTTPS could be using the Google DNS services.
Hmm, I don't think so in this case. Although I will check tomorrow. Thanks for the tip! |
||
| 2 | |||
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
How did you figure out you are establishing a connection to google? Wireshark or similar? Does it happen specifically as you open Firefox, or what do you mean with keeping ‘a connection permanently’? Which endpoint is it trying to reach? I feel these are important details before people can help you out.
Firefox is trying to connect to 34.160.144.191 at startup. Firefox should never talk to google. And if there is some database that google has that firefox needs, Firefox should duplicate that DB. I have a feeling it's the safebrowsing. Will find out later. And then will disable. |
||
| 5 | |||
bazzett
lemmy.world
bazzett@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
LibreWolf can't be a convenient daily driver. Need tweaks and tweaking default settings may reduce privacy and security slightly.
Yes, I've tried it multiple times, but, apart of the so-called "privacy features", I can't find a single reason to use it instead of regular Firefox. Well, I suppose that if you're really paranoid, or hate every single decision Mozilla makes with the force of a thousand suns, then it can be appealing. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
InfiniteStruggle
sh.itjust.works
InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-02 |
Yes, I've tried it multiple times, but, apart of the so-called "privacy features", I can't find a single reason to use it instead of regular Firefox. Well, I suppose that if you're really paranoid, or hate every single decision Mozilla makes with the force of a thousand suns, then it can be appealing.
Thats because it is so close to Firefox to not even be distinct, but the privacy settings are useful anyway. I've used it as a daily driver for a long time and have not yet found it lacking. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
InfiniteStruggle
sh.itjust.works
InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-02 |
I don't want to have to "taint" my distro install by adding a repo. I want it to be available from my distro's official repo.
You're going to miss out on great software with that approach. Even for packages that have a Debian apt version, I find it much safer to get it from the maintainers official repos. Get the same version as the apt package if you must. |
||
| 2 | |||
kalkulat
lemmy.world
kalkulat@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-10-02 |
For years, just in case I've missed disabling some FF telemetry ... Every night I disable networking. Mornings I start FF up first, and (once my -local- home page is fully loaded) only then do I enable networking. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Don_alForno
feddit.org
Don_alForno@feddit.org Joined: 2024-07-22 |
Yes, I've tried it multiple times, but, apart of the so-called "privacy features", I can't find a single reason to use it instead of regular Firefox. Well, I suppose that if you're really paranoid, or hate every single decision Mozilla makes with the force of a thousand suns, then it can be appealing.
Because it's supposed to be Firefox but private. That's literally the only distinction. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
Yes, Google Safe Browsing is probably the cause. Anyone curious can read more about it here, but that traffic at browser startup is probably going to Google's Safe Browsing API servers.
I've disabled all of the safe browsing via about:config still talks to google. weird. also it still keeps the connection open either for re-use or, dunno. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
Ok I have some news - It's not safebrowsing - or probably not - maybe I just can't turn it off now or something. So I
Nothing worked. Eventually got logs running with: found out mozilla is doing fucking push notifications?? wtf. that resolves to google? Anyway, it does a bunch of shit. All talking to google in the end. I hate Firefox. I'm so over all of this. When I start the browser, and it is blank, and I have done nothing, it should do nothing. Talking to google, even doing dns lookups every fucking time I open a browser. God. Who are these people. /rant |
||
| 0 | |||
|
blaggle42
lemmy.today
blaggle42@lemmy.today Joined: 2024-12-11 |
f course not; it’s the distro that makes the call. But I want the Librewolf folks to make the effort to get accepted by the distro. Hmm, I will try the LibreWolf - will also try disabling safe browsing. Thanks for the info!
Btw, disabling Safe Browsing didn't do the trick. I did download LibreWolf. I have bad news - it does exactly the same thing. Sigh. Maybe if you are using it you should profile it on osx or windows - or ntop linux I think will do it. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |