| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » UK Politics |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
supersquirrel
sopuli.xyz
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz Joined: 2023-12-09 |
|
||
| 46 Original | |||
|
FishFace
piefed.social
FishFace@piefed.social Joined: 2025-10-16 |
They were apparently moved because they referred to areas that were not, at the time, Palestine. Like referring to any place in the 17th century as "Germany" would also not be appropriate. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
RubberDuck
lemmy.world
RubberDuck@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-31 |
They were apparently moved because they referred to areas that were not, at the time, Palestine. Like referring to any place in the 17th century as "Germany" would also not be appropriate.
Isn't the normal way of referring to historical places is to say what the location was called then and what its current location is called now e.g. artifact dating from 1500bc was found in Canan which is in modern day Palestine. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
FishFace
piefed.social
FishFace@piefed.social Joined: 2025-10-16 |
Isn't the normal way of referring to historical places is to say what the location was called then and what its current location is called now e.g. artifact dating from 1500bc was found in Canan which is in modern day Palestine.
It depends how well known the area is, and the context, but yes that is common. |
||
| 0 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |