RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
HISTORICAL ACCURACY MATTERS (AnonHistory)
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
PugJesus piefed.social PugJesus@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-03-24
Quote

37   Original
PugJesus Moderator PugJesus@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-03-24
#2 · Quote Reply

Explanation: The Roman Lorica Segmentata, depicted in the above panels, is considered the most distinctive form of Roman armor, and is often used in depictions both before and after its actual, historical existence. Segmentata was used mostly from the 1st-3rd century AD, with some usage straggling into the 4th century AD. Before and after? Chainmail or scale armor. Or no armor.

At the bottom, this is extrapolated to American history as a metaphor to show how out-of-place it is! Behold, GI Joe (GI Jane?) seizing the airports of the American Revolutionary War.

10
Mîm lemmy.zip Mim@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2024-08-24
#3 · Quote Reply

Counter point: the Lorica Segmentata looks fucking cool.

6
Malta Soron sopuli.xyz maltasoron@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2023-04-24
#4 · Quote Reply

Explanation: The Roman Lorica Segmentata, depicted in the above panels, is considered the most distinctive form of Roman armor, and is often used in depictions both before and after its actual, historical existence. Segmentata was used mostly from the 1st-3rd century AD, with some usage straggling into the 4th century AD. Before and after? Chainmail or scale armor. Or no armor. At the bottom, t...

It also works the other way around. People often depict medieval soldiers with outdated armour and weapons, saying things like: "he probably had his grandfather's sword lying around and took that with him to the battle". That's like taking WW2 equipment to Iraq (or Cold War era Soviet tanks to Ukraine 😬).

3
Post Reply
Back to top