| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» Ask Lemmy
Page 2 of 2 Goto page « First Previous 1, 2 |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
YappyMonotheist
lemmy.world
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-04-26 |
What does this mean …?
Nothing, they don't know either, they just heard it or read it online and now they feel absolved from the duty of political thought (which is just applied ethics in the end). |
||
| 1 | |||
|
YappyMonotheist
lemmy.world
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-04-26 |
Everything is politics and anyone who thinks it isn't needs to check their privilege.
"But I don't want to question my own beliefs and test my moral fiber, I just wanna have fun online!!!" - average netizen |
||
| -1 | |||
|
Sephtis
lemmy.world
Sephtis@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-02-11 |
I don't see a problem with a bunch of European-specific questions being asked, so I question the need for an expanded rule. If you broaden the rule, you run at risk of banning or discouraging desirable questions. Stuff about economics or lifestyle. Those are "political" too, after all.
I mean yo run the risk of banning some stuff regardless of if you only ban us politcs or eu politcs. What would be a reason why questions about european politcs would be any different than us politcs. best would be to just ban polutics in general, while keeping lifestyle/economical stuff etc, this would however require some nuance Edit: to specify i don't mean to ban European specific questions, just eu-poltics. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
uKale
lemmy.world
uKale@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-05-30 |
Keep the rule as it is, and take those kinds of discussions in communities meant for political discussion. There's already enough of US politics everywhere else. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
draco_aeneus
mander.xyz
draco_aeneus@mander.xyz Joined: 2026-01-23 |
I mean yo run the risk of banning some stuff regardless of if you only ban us politcs or eu politcs. What would be a reason why questions about european politcs would be any different than us politcs. best would be to just ban polutics in general, while keeping lifestyle/economical stuff etc, this would however require some nuance Edit: to specify i don't mean to ban European specific questions...
Fair, but nuanced rules are difficult to enforce, and somewhat open to interpretation. This leads to people trying to skirt the rules and also good faith posts which break the rules which leads to conflict also. I think it's better to keep things as simple as possible, as long as the rule is good enough. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
presoak
lazysoci.al
presoak@lazysoci.al Joined: 2025-11-29 |
Nothing, they don't know either, they just heard it or read it online and now they feel absolved from the duty of political thought (which is just applied ethics in the end).
I'll have you know that's a presoak original. And when you deepthroat the meme of the hour, and jump and froth and babble angrily in lockstep, you aren't achieving diddly. |
||
| -1 | |||
|
Sephtis
lemmy.world
Sephtis@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-02-11 |
Fair, but nuanced rules are difficult to enforce, and somewhat open to interpretation. This leads to people trying to skirt the rules and also good faith posts which break the rules which leads to conflict also. I think it's better to keep things as simple as possible, as long as the rule is good enough.
Totally agree. Imo It already requires nuance at the moment, the only thing that would change is that all users would be treated the same |
||
| 0 | |||
|
hector
lemmy.today
hector@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-09-03 |
Where do you draw the line between world news and politics? I mean the president launching airstrikes on Iran for Israel's forever war, is that politics? The US annexing Greenland? The US bullying the EU into letting tech run roughshod over their users? What about the EU imposing age checks and chatcontrol as a trojan horse to get inside liberal democracy to id every account and every ip and connect it to id cards and likeness, and run everything a person does or says through AI threat detection, run by Palantir type organizations, to make secret social scores to be used in secret in myriad ways against people in ways they can never know and not challenge? Is that politics? It's impossible to extract world news from politics completely is it not? I personally have been ignoring whatever dumbass shit the president has been saying, and political news myself, just trying to follow events, but you can't separate them completely. |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 2 of 2
Goto page
« First
Previous
1, 2
Back to top |