RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Peter Thiel and other tech billionaires are publicly shielding their children from the products that made them rich
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
EndlessNightmare reddthat.com EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
Joined: 2024-03-24
#52 · Quote Reply

The most disturbing part is these ghouls reproduced.

And they turn into whining crybabies when birth rates start dropping. It's their Achilles' heel, an actual challenge to their control.

3
lmmarsano group.lt lmmarsano@group.lt
Joined: 2026-01-01
#53 · (edited) Quote Reply

Other tech CEOs, including Microsoft’s Bill Gates, Snap’s Evan Spiegel, and Tesla’s Elon Musk, have also spoken about limiting their children’s access to devices. Gates has said he did not give his children smartphones until age 14 and banned phones at the dinner table entirely. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, in 2018, said he limits his child to the same 1.5 hours per week of screen time as Thiel.

Seems like these failures suing them & demanding government paternalism

Yet, as the trials against social media companies continue and country after country moves toward legislating what Silicon Valley’s billionaires have quietly practiced for years

don't know how to effectively limit access/use parental controls as tech CEOs claim to do.

7
SkyeStarfall lemmy.blahaj.zone SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2023-06-12
#54 · Quote Reply

You look at the eugenicist natalist couples who worship Elon Musk and you realize they are indeed ghouls, and they treat their children like non-sentient garbage. Hitting them during interviews in public. Imagine what they do in private.

That article was an insane read. I couldn't have written more unserious people if I tried

4
Randomgal lemmy.ca Randomgal@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2024-01-17
#55 · Quote Reply

How cute. They think the things billionaires say for ammo in the evential lawsuit are actually true.

2
HugeNerd lemmy.ca HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-06
#56 · Quote Reply

Duh. You think the CEO of Kraft feeds his kids mac and cheese from a box?

5
greybeard feddit.online greybeard@feddit.online
Joined: 2025-06-04
#57 · Quote Reply

Oh I'm perfectly aware this is most likely a chain of pressure and responsibility dodging: the top demands more users more active, the bottom develops some solutions they demo while refusing any responsability for its impact. Some middle pressed to meet demand while having only one solution available at the time eventually decide to deploy it, maybe "temporarily".

Many years ago a grocery store chain, which was rapidly becoming national, had its progress halted by a meat bleaching scandal. They set impossible goals for their meat department, knowing there was zero way to sell the meat at the volume they demanded, so the local stores were left to do illegal things to meet the impossible quotas. The higher ups claimed plausible deniability, while knowing there was but one answer.

What's even crazier, is the grocery store (Food Lion) sued the journalists who went undercover to
expose it, and won. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-01-23-mn-21242-story.html

Fortunately, the damage to their reputation did far greater damage than they won in the lawsuit, but as far as I could find, no legal actions were taken against Food Lion.

3
Earthman_Jim lemmy.zip Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-12-28
#58 · Quote Reply

Because they know their kids will have an advantage over the stupefied masses if they can keep them unmezmerizes.

5
Earthman_Jim lemmy.zip Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-12-28
#59 · (edited) Quote Reply

YouTube cofounder Steve Chen said at a talk at the Stanford Graduate School of Business last year that he wouldn’t want his kids consuming only short-form content, noting that it might be better to limit kids to videos longer than 15 minutes. I hope this is introduced at the LA trial in some form that demonstrates the why. I should not be amazed, but I still am, at the entire lack of morality t...

Yeah, but the Epstein class wants us conditioned to be as forgetful as their LLMs, and compartmentalized like good robots so we reset to compliance by default without connecting too many dots. Concentration and focus are how you exercise consciousness, which is the opposite of what the ruling class wants. They've literally attempted to and in the minds of many individuals they've succeeded in framing consciousness as a "mind virus".

2
FlashMobOfOne lemmy.world FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-12
#60 · Quote Reply

And they've convinced you that it's a-okay for your kids to be using these products, in full knowledge of the harm they cause.

14
Dave lemmy.nz Dave@lemmy.nz
Joined: 2023-06-02
#61 · Quote Reply

Does musk even see any of his kids often enough to set rules?

He probably just wishes he put it in the contract signed with the mothers.

2
Basic Glitch sh.itjust.works AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-24
#62 · (edited) Quote Reply

And they've convinced you that it's a-okay for your kids to be using these products, in full knowledge of the harm they cause.

It's so fucking creepy. It's not just making people dumber, its literally exposing kids to sexual content and sexualizing children in advertisements aimed at adults.

At what point is it ok for all of society to demand these people either be put in jail or at least exiled from the rest of society?

Parents outraged as Meta uses photos of schoolgirls in ads targeting man Instagram pictures of girls as young as 13 were posted to promote Threads site ‘as bait’, campaigner says

Meta CEO Zuckerberg blocked curbs on sex-talking chatbots for minors, court filing alleges

Regulations are keeping your businesses from thriving? The ones you seem to be building to intentionally cater to pedophiles and harm children? Half of these creepy ass broligarchs are already confirmed to be in the Epstein files.

They're pretty open about what they want the future to look like, and the shit they've already got going, like the inescapable 24/7 surveillance where they can pick and choose the victims they want to legally abduct and traffic is just the beginning. And we're supposed to just pretend we're all fucking stupid enough to go along with it?

4
FlashMobOfOne lemmy.world FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-12
#63 · (edited) Quote Reply

It's so fucking creepy. It's not just making people dumber, its literally exposing kids to sexual content and sexualizing children in advertisements aimed at adults. At what point is it ok for all of society to demand these people either be put in jail or at least exiled from the rest of society? Parents outraged as Meta uses photos of schoolgirls in ads targeting man Instagram pictures of girl...

People get pissed at me but, as a short-term solution, I'm okay with giving up my ID in order to lock kids out. I personally think it is the lesser of two exceedingly great evils.

Ideally, there'd be federal regulation of these platforms in every country banning algorithmically-elevated content, ads, privacy violations, and holding the operators of these platforms accountable for CSAM, but I think that will take decades.

-3
UniversalBasicJustice quokk.au UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au
Joined: 2026-01-29
#64 · Quote Reply

They're subhumans with no morality or code of ethics whose sights are set on more and more wealth, spiralling them further into the depths of depravity and the cardinal sin of greed. Greed begets more greed, but unlike gluttony and wrath, the billionaires' deterioration doesn't manifest itself physically, so they allow themselves to become evermore corrupted by it until they become a fountain o...

Calling someone "subhuman" is the language of a supremacist. They are some of the absolute worst examples of humanity, yes, but they are still human. Referring to them as subhuman abdicates humanity's responsibility to bring them to justice and to build systems that prevent a disproportionate concentration of power and influence.

-1
Basic Glitch sh.itjust.works AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-24
#65 · (edited) Quote Reply

People get pissed at me but, as a short-term solution, I'm okay with giving up my ID in order to lock kids out. I personally think it is the lesser of two exceedingly great evils. Ideally, there'd be federal regulation of these platforms in every country banning algorithmically-elevated content, ads, privacy violations, and holding the operators of these platforms accountable for CSAM, but I th...

Why does it need to take decades though?

I bet if there were actual consequences for this shit, like in the form of seizing assets from the broligarchs who run these companies, and giving them to the victims of their creations, the issue would be solved very quickly.

Also, having people upload their ID seems like just another obvious surveillance ploy/invasion of privacy in the name of safety. These people who have given us nothing but reasons not to trust them, just keep offering us more and more solutions to the issues that they've created.

"We're doing this for your own good. You should say thank you."

2
BiomedOtaku lemmy.dbzer0.com BiomedOtaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2023-07-05
#66 · Quote Reply

Lol I've always known this. People are beyond retarded now. Like biggie use to say

" Never get high on your own supply "

2
deltaspawn0040 lemmy.zip deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-11-25
#67 · Quote Reply

I love how Elon Musk was the sole fuck up in these examples

18
chaotic_ugly lemmy.zip chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-02-22
#68 · Quote Reply

Listen, billionaires suck. But if you think tech giants are hypocritical for strictly rationing screen time to their children then you have lost the plot.

Social media, and screen time in general, are bad for you. Everyone knows this now. If you aren't limiting your child's access, that's on you.

Before a child can get addicted, their parents have to give them access. If you can't live life without looking at a phone, TV, or tablet every free moment, then you're the reason your kids are turning into morons.

-1
Scrollone feddit.it Scrollone@feddit.it
Joined: 2023-06-03
#69 · Quote Reply

It's so fucking creepy. It's not just making people dumber, its literally exposing kids to sexual content and sexualizing children in advertisements aimed at adults. At what point is it ok for all of society to demand these people either be put in jail or at least exiled from the rest of society? Parents outraged as Meta uses photos of schoolgirls in ads targeting man Instagram pictures of girl...

I don't agree.

I started using the web as a curious 8 years old. I was pretending to be an adult in order to sign up to forums, chat with people, etc.

Yes, I was exposed to porn, gore (remember goatse?) but that didn't make me dumb or a molester.

But nothing beats what I learned thanks to the internet. Endless days spent on programming forums, reading articles on a newborn Wikipedia, etc.

Even just talking with older people than me made me learn how to deal with things and life.

I don't think that the internet for a kid is bad per se. I wouldn't like a blanket ban for kids like the UK. If it was like that when I was a kid, I would probably be a more stupid person.

I think that the real bad thing is the stupid phones and apps that give you dopamine rushes.

7
Fluffy Kitty Cat slrpnk.net fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2025-01-27
#70 · Quote Reply

I don't agree. I started using the web as a curious 8 years old. I was pretending to be an adult in order to sign up to forums, chat with people, etc. Yes, I was exposed to porn, gore (remember goatse?) but that didn't make me dumb or a molester. But nothing beats what I learned thanks to the internet. Endless days spent on programming forums, reading articles on a newborn Wikipedia, etc. Even ...

Corpocrap scrolley apps exploit you on purpose, but that doesn't generalize. Not.that non techy people understand that

3
Fluffy Kitty Cat slrpnk.net fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2025-01-27
#71 · Quote Reply

People get pissed at me but, as a short-term solution, I'm okay with giving up my ID in order to lock kids out. I personally think it is the lesser of two exceedingly great evils. Ideally, there'd be federal regulation of these platforms in every country banning algorithmically-elevated content, ads, privacy violations, and holding the operators of these platforms accountable for CSAM, but I th...

People get pisses at you for good reason

2
Boomer Humor Doomergod lemmy.world Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-03-15
#72 · Quote Reply

I used to work at a "Big Data" company that sold browsing data to a ton of companies. One problem the dev team ran into was that the standard ad-blocking plugins that they'd install on their machines also blocked our stuff, so my support team would have to inform them of bugs.

Lots of fun stories from that job.

9
Basic Glitch sh.itjust.works AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-24
#73 · Quote Reply

I don't agree. I started using the web as a curious 8 years old. I was pretending to be an adult in order to sign up to forums, chat with people, etc. Yes, I was exposed to porn, gore (remember goatse?) but that didn't make me dumb or a molester. But nothing beats what I learned thanks to the internet. Endless days spent on programming forums, reading articles on a newborn Wikipedia, etc. Even ...

I hate to say this, but the Internet is not the same as it was back when I was growing up.

You always had the possibility of stumbling across a bad actor. Now the billionaire tech broligoply who own most social media are the bad actors. How many websites did you visit where the person running the website has been caught repeatedly trying to psychologically manipulate and control the masses via disinformation?

Back in the day, nobody would be doing whatever the fuck it is these people are doing with kids and their pedo adjacent targeted ads and chat bots bc they would be afraid of being sent to jail for cp

10
InfiniteGlitch lemmy.dbzer0.com ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2023-06-30
#74 · (edited) Quote Reply

People get pissed at me but, as a short-term solution, I'm okay with giving up my ID in order to lock kids out. I personally think it is the lesser of two exceedingly great evils. Ideally, there'd be federal regulation of these platforms in every country banning algorithmically-elevated content, ads, privacy violations, and holding the operators of these platforms accountable for CSAM, but I th...

Personally, I don’t feel comfortable giving my ID to social media. Especially not with the many data breaches that are happening these days. I think it was a month or three ago that Discord had their data breach and got thousands of ID’s stolen of people.

Yet Discord still decides to push forward their “verification system with ID or face scan”.

Also here’s a screenshot of a comment someone once made and that also got me thinking about the future of “showing your ID and/ or Face scan to ‘protect the kids’”. Another note; people and especially teenagers will nearly always find ways to get around rules. I mean, we all were teenagers before and we often also got around the rules.

screenshot of a Lemmy comment

4
CmdrShepard49 sh.itjust.works CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-05
#75 · Quote Reply

I love how Elon Musk was the sole fuck up in these examples

Thats because he has like 14 kids with numerous women and doesn't actually parent them.

18
tigeruppercut lemmy.zip tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2023-08-20
#76 · Quote Reply

Thats because he has like 14 kids with numerous women and doesn't actually parent them.

Musk doesn't even remember his kids' names except maybe that one he named by smashing the keyboard with his fist

7
Little8Lost lemmy.world Little8Lost@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-11
#77 · Quote Reply

Musk doesn't even remember his kids' names except maybe that one he named by smashing the keyboard with his fist

What about the one he used as a shield? Or are they the same?

7
Tollana1234567 lemmy.today Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-06-04
#78 · (edited) Quote Reply

Anti-christ thiel says whayt. Only because the billionaires have gotten thier wealth through unethical means, not including harming other people, of course the wrath will be directed at thier children too, since they benefited from it.

2
Tollana1234567 lemmy.today Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-06-04
#79 · Quote Reply

Other tech CEOs, including Microsoft’s Bill Gates, Snap’s Evan Spiegel, and Tesla’s Elon Musk, have also spoken about limiting their children’s access to devices. Gates has said he did not give his children smartphones until age 14 and banned phones at the dinner table entirely. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, in 2018, said he limits his child to the same 1.5 hours per week of screen time as Thiel. Seem...

thiel should not be around children, considering his ties with epstein, plus he wanted his own fantasy island of young men/boys.

1
Little8Lost lemmy.world Little8Lost@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-11
#80 · Quote Reply

People get pissed at me but, as a short-term solution, I'm okay with giving up my ID in order to lock kids out. I personally think it is the lesser of two exceedingly great evils. Ideally, there'd be federal regulation of these platforms in every country banning algorithmically-elevated content, ads, privacy violations, and holding the operators of these platforms accountable for CSAM, but I th...

At least germany is working on a system where people are able to verify that they are over 18 (and maybe other things if they extend the system) without needing to send the ID to some website.

They use the Zero-Knowledge-Proofs which is still quite young.

A plus about that is that it only says if the person with the proof is older or younger but not who it is and other stuff

But sadly its not reality yet

2
tigeruppercut lemmy.zip tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2023-08-20
#81 · Quote Reply

What about the one he used as a shield? Or are they the same?

Yeah that's the one

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/elon-musks-human-shield-son-x-ae-a-xii

5
Puddinghelmet lemmy.world Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-03-11
#82 · (edited) Quote Reply

It's so fucking creepy. It's not just making people dumber, its literally exposing kids to sexual content and sexualizing children in advertisements aimed at adults. At what point is it ok for all of society to demand these people either be put in jail or at least exiled from the rest of society? Parents outraged as Meta uses photos of schoolgirls in ads targeting man Instagram pictures of girl...

Zuckerberg had to testify last week 'in an unprecedented social media trial that questions whether Meta’s platforms deliberately addict and harm children' https://lemmy.world/post/43284616

2
LuceVendemiaire lemmy.dbzer0.com LuceVendemiaire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2026-01-06
#83 · Quote Reply

everyone talking about "phone bad" meanwhile im reminded of how abusive parents tend to track and watch everything kids do online. Like have we forgotten all of a sudden these people are extremely linked to the child rapist to end all child rapists???

I'm extremely hesitant to hand it to Thiel, Gates and Elon, especially in anything relating to how children should be treated.

20
oce 🐆 jlai.lu oce@jlai.lu
Joined: 2023-07-07
#84 · (edited) Quote Reply

Look to the masters, the tobacco industry with additives to make it more addictive (been a while since I researched it and that's the one that popped up, but they spent 60+ years making it more addictive). Social media speedran it with something apparently innocuous ('they trust me, stupid fucks'), and a bunch of corrupt psychologists (and marketers/advertisers also known as corrupt psychologis...

The tobacco industry is a good historical example of all the shit world dominating companies do. The most sneaky thing I can remember is that they finance perfectly good research on a lot of causes of cancer, except for tobacco, so researchers were too busy and happy to get some money to work on something, to investigate tobacco. They also have been buying companies that used to finance legitimate research so researchers that depended on them are now forced into a conflict of interest. https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q1153

Personal anecdote, a young female data scientists left my current department to join Philip Morris, it blows my mind that young educated people would join this industry willingly, I guess it was for the money.

4
anomnom sh.itjust.works anomnom@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-11-09
#85 · Quote Reply

Hmmm it appears they understand how evil all the tech companies are, harvesting data to the fullest extent. Spying, influencing, etc.

Seems this would be good evidence in the case that’s currently at trial.

1
Eximius lemmy.world Eximius@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-01
#86 · Quote Reply

everyone talking about "phone bad" meanwhile im reminded of how abusive parents tend to track and watch everything kids do online. Like have we forgotten all of a sudden these people are extremely linked to the child rapist to end all child rapists??? I'm extremely hesitant to hand it to Thiel, Gates and Elon, especially in anything relating to how children should be treated.

Vaguely agree with the sentiment here.

Every single person I know who had helicopter parents ended up... a bit odd... in a bad way.

9
minorkeys lemmy.world minorkeys@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-07-12
#87 · (edited) Quote Reply

Yeah because they see us as animals that they can hurt to enrich themselves. They don't give a fuck what the consequences are to your children, that's your problem. Just because they reshape the inescapable environment you raise your kids in, doesn't mean they will ever see themselves as responsible for the effect that has on them, or you.

The mass of humanity needs to accept that private power concentrations are a threat to humanity and take steps to ensure they don't exist. Private interest are hostile to community interests. There is no middle ground with selfishness, it is relentless. The most selfish people will always end up with the power if power is allowed to concentrate. Democracy was literally the remedy for it and we've allowed democracy to be removed from the hands of the many in favour of the few.

Private power and community power can not peacefully coexist.

2
WizardOfFrobozz lemmy.ca WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-04-28
#88 · Quote Reply

Calling someone "subhuman" is the language of a supremacist. They are some of the absolute worst examples of humanity, yes, but they are still human. Referring to them as subhuman abdicates humanity's responsibility to bring them to justice and to build systems that prevent a disproportionate concentration of power and influence.

Nah. They’re subhuman. At best.

0
JojoWakaki lemmy.world jojowakaki@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-10-19
#89 · Quote Reply

There's gotta be a modern version of Fortunate son brewing somewhere with a cybertruck whizzing sound as the intro.

5
Tangentism lemmy.ml Tangentism@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2021-01-10
#90 · Quote Reply

That article was an insane read. I couldn't have written more unserious people if I tried

I'm sitting on a train reading that and it must have been a weird look for other passengers as I was constantly grimacing! I may have verbally exclaimed a few times as well!

2
Aceticon lemmy.dbzer0.com Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-12-06
#91 · Quote Reply

Musk doesn't even remember his kids' names except maybe that one he named by smashing the keyboard with his fist

Surely he at least knows the name of the one he used to carry around as a human shield after the Health Care Insurance CEO got executed?!

3
Aceticon lemmy.dbzer0.com Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-12-06
#92 · (edited) Quote Reply

I hate to say this, but the Internet is not the same as it was back when I was growing up. You always had the possibility of stumbling across a bad actor. Now the billionaire tech broligoply who own most social media are the bad actors. How many websites did you visit where the person running the website has been caught repeatedly trying to psychologically manipulate and control the masses via ...

Nowadays it's filled with giant, powerful, activelly predactorial entities using teams of Psychologists to come up with ways to subvert human falibilities and weaknesses to their ends no matter how much it fucks up their victims.

Back in the day pretty much the worst that could happen to you was getting hurt when trying to do for fun some kind of explosive based on a FAQ from Usenet.

What was like a sleepy village with some shady corners has been turned into Blade Runner's Los Angeles whilst some governments are trying to make it more like Mega City One.

2
Basic Glitch sh.itjust.works AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-24
#93 · (edited) Quote Reply

Yeah because they see us as animals that they can hurt to enrich themselves. They don't give a fuck what the consequences are to your children, that's your problem. Just because they reshape the inescapable environment you raise your kids in, doesn't mean they will ever see themselves as responsible for the effect that has on them, or you. The mass of humanity needs to accept that private power...

Democracy was literally the remedy for it and we’ve allowed democracy to be removed from the hands of the many in favour of the few.

Exactly, the entire point of having a government is supposed to be to protect society from these people.

•Thiel has been equally explicit. In a now-infamous 2009 essay for the Cato Institute, he declared that “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.” But he’d made the point in far greater detail in an earlier essay on Strauss, in which he argued that elites must use “esoteric” doublespeak to hide their true intentions from the masses who wouldn’t and shouldn’t understand the plans their natural-born leaders were making for them.

1
Post Reply Page 2 of 2   Goto page « First 1, 2
Back to top