Warning: Loud and profanity

I don't know how common that name is but I do know that video and the people involved are located around Columbus, Ohio which is about 65 miles away from Butler. The video first appeared online maybe about 20 years ago at most.

That's why they say a sneeze is 1/8^th^ of an orgasm[^0][^1].

[^0]: Don't hold me to that specific value for a wide variety of reasons. I chose 8 because 8-choose. Excuse me.
[^1]: Also, while reading up on this, I landed on the wiki page for sexually induced sneezing. Turns out there's erectile tissue in the nose (and not in a crude "your mother" joke temporary kind of way) so "nose boner" could be a way to describe one's response to a pleasant smell.

fFUUUUCK

Key note missing in title is that she is a minor so he's also a pedo

You can’t make this shit up, if it weren’t about real life you’d think it’s one of those early 2000’s comedies alla American pie or a Gilbert Gottfried skit.

Wtf republicans 🤮 for all the hating these ghouls do… disgusting.

It's always who you most suspect

You should consider committing to reading an entire comment before chiming in, next time. Your comment was irrelevant and didn't really add much to the conversation. Yes, he's a pedo. No, that's not relevant to this comment thread, which is discussing the Republican party's projections.

Come one, maybe he just likes the detergents she uses?

Florida of the North strikes again. This is the sort of shit I fully expect to come out of Ohio.

It does say teen so isn't that a minor? Unless 19?

Usual suspects

Ewww!!!!

All our enemies are ontologically evil, and so on...

In the article it specified teenage minor. Likely under 18 as that is the age of consent in most places

He must have been a trans deep sleeper state wokie! /s

So... it's gross and everything but what law is there against smelling panties?

Republicans are the worst

The only thing that can save him now is if he offers his daughter up for trump's degenerate pleasure.

Nice try nerd, I'm too busy playing football and making out with tons of chicks

Dingus.

The guy was charged with voyeurism. From my quick googling, it seems like the laws say to be charged you have to be spying on someone or recording/photographing them, so I still don't see how this is against the law, but it's obviously gross.

Edit, I guess this is probably the part that he's charged with so maybe makes sense.

"The elements of voyeurism under R.C. 2907.08 require proof beyond all reasonable doubt that the defendant:

(A) for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying the defendant committed trespass or surreptitiously invaded the privacy of another to spy or eavesdrop upon another person;"

Yep, and that's why it's not just stuff like this, but also stuff like them being gay, or Alex Jones watching trans porn, or boebert getting caught giving a handy at a play.

Interesting how it's ALWAYS REPUBLICANS

Still no drag queens.

I'll take a stab at this rhetorical question, even though I'm not a right winger nor an American -- just been reading up on their 'theories' and wackiness a bit.

From their ideological perspective, I imagine that the more nuanced response (ie. not the base's "GAY BAD!"), would be that the issue of crime/outliers exist in any group, but that the existence of a trans-interest specific movement is dangerous to the broader community/stability. Do republican pedophile incestuous mayors exist? Yes. Are they lobbying to change how government treats them / trying to get more privileges and special treatment to support their pedophile incestuous mayor collective? No. So the 'risk' to society of a one off criminal, is far less than the risk of a collective movement intent on dismantling social norms in favour of norms specifically beneficial to their niche members, and generally detrimental to the interests of non-niche members.

It's similar to Dave Chappelle's comments, about how he knows/likes trans people he meets on an individual/personal level, but he hates the "trans community". It's the collective community that they take issue with, as it aims to dismantle what they consider the norms of social life / public interactions.

To try and frame their issue a bit differently using a recent example: most educated folks know about people with Tourette's, even if they don't fully understand the condition. But there's a significant difference between understanding it / tolerating it within a limited context, and inviting someone with Tourette's to sit within mic shot at the BAFTA's and pretending everyone should be comfortable with it just because it's a disability. Being at a black-tie type event, and hearing someone scream the N-word at a couple of black presenters is uncivilized, but it's "tolerated" under the guise of these niche special interest groups. Just like everyone's been forced to "tolerate" fent users collapsed all over the place in many metropolitan cities, under the guise of "drug user rights advocacy groups" -- do people understand folks are addicted? Yes. Does that understanding make seeing them flopped out, shitting in public etc, a "civilized" experience? Nah.

This is why I always wait until my daughters are 18 before huffing their dirty undies.

Only if you'd sniff your daughters (or any other minors) underwear

Oh shit, i didn't even know he had presidential qualities

Conservatives rage at made up stories about Democrats.

Conservatives tend to be awfully quiet about videos of conservatives doing bad shit.

He looks a bit like Kent Hovind.

lol

*hork

Was hoping to open the article and find out that it was an exaggerated clickbait headline and he was just doing laundry.

I should never hope when it comes to Republicans.

I’m just gonna say from my perspective, this take is wrong.

I understand where you were trying to go with this, but I completely disagree that that is what republicans are thinking when they hate on trans people. Most republicans who are transphobic hate the individual trans people too, not just the community. It’s pretty apparent with how they treat individual trans people in public. Even cis people, if they look just slightly “too androgynous” (read not exactly what the bigot expects a cis person to look like), are targets for these people.

And that also doesn’t touch on why republicans paint trans people as pedophiles, when the biggest pedophile operations are within the religious and political elite. AFAIK, there is no correlation between transgenderism and pedophilia. There is a high correlation between religiosity and pedophilia though.

Like Cheney and Nixon?

It's usually projection. It's like a joke but it's not.

Dingus

You may think the take is wrong, but it's basically what Posobiec and them attempt to argue in "Unhumans", a political ideology book that's been lauded by Vance, Trump Jr, Carlson and so on. It is rather overtly what their more "intellectual" (debatable!) contingent paint as the ideological justification for their actions. What they describe there also explains what they're "trying" to do with some of their other shenanigans, like the supreme courts overturning of women's rights -- or more specifically, why they wanted to push that down to the state level as part of their broader objectives.

That it gets implemented in a fear mongering way that attempts to rile up the uneducated common US idiot is a secondary 'thing' -- as is the common US idiots take on it in the "They gonna fuck our kids/jobs!". The ideology not matching the implementation isn't a 'new' phenomenon, nor is it restricted to fascists -- communism is an easy example on that front, where the 'ideology' rarely matches the implementation, even if you can 'see' elements of the ideology underpinning the movements justification for their actions.

Mayor material. In line with the president.

spy or eavesdrop

Did he though?

Was probably just ensuring those were dirty panties so he could put them in the washer. Hims troking his junk is totally unrelated...

I actually thought he looked liked Jimmy Carr

Working for antifa!

It is usually republicans, but when it's a democrat the stories don't gain as much traction on Lemmy.

• Democrat #1
• Democrat #2
• Democrat #3

Generally when it's a democrat, we are not defending it is the difference. Granted, the news stories don't gain as much traction on left biased social media platforms, but at least we aren't defending them and making them president.

I can also see that. I just thought of Hovind because I watched some of the professor Dave video on Hovind he released recently.