Maybe a good campaign and following your promises? Just a hunch to be popular in a popularity contest.

Gladly. They'll just justify it until they remove anyone who thinks murder is bad.

To be fair, Axios always had this writing style.

Yeah but thats a pretty AI specific framing.

This is full of half truths and outright falsification. Biden delayed a single shipment of weapons. "Official stances" mean nothing as the slaughter continued unabated. The aid flotilla cost $200 million to build and only delivered a few trucks worth of food before falling apart.

Do you really have that big of a hard-on for Biden and Harris that you'd help whitewash their participation in all this? Can you explain exactly what it is you get out of doing that?

Imagine if you used all that energy to help rid the party of these god awful human beings that wouldn't think twice about doing the same thing to you if it helped their chances at get just a little bit more power. Instead you use that energy to craft a false reality in order to protect two proven losers and their ilk.

Even if you believed that both sides were equal on the topic of Gaza, against all evidence, then you would still be an idiot to allow the Trump admin back for every other issue in which the parties differ.

Are you saying Trump is a better alternative to Biden?

Yup, this is the system that exists in the US whether you like it or not

Exactly. And it's obvious from the post: The collective action against the Democrats helped Trump win the US election. I have to wonder if these voters are proud of what they've helped accomplish.

You are a promoter of fascism.

If Harris had won, would Palestine be in a worse state than it is today?

Trump won with a plurality of the popular vote, but yes still bad.

You're insane. People like you are why that pedophile Trump is president.

The morons running the democratic party thought it was more important to support a genocide than to gain votes. Somehow you think those same morons would protect us from fascism or make anything better.

Why don't you stop and think for a second why the democrats would decide it's better to risk votes than to stop genocide? Clearly you had to leave practically all online leftist spaces because you're not actually a leftist. So stop cosplaying by saying "we" are all stupid. We're not stupid enough to think a party that refuses votes just so they can continue supporting genocide is willing to help at all.

You understand nuance and a binary choice, right? "They fielded a 34-time felon pedo traitor. We're not a 34-time felon pedo traitor. Vote for us" should be more than enough.

For that matter, you understand evolutionary process, right? The idea that "better" becomes "best" after more-than-one cycle?

That statement exists as a result of fierce misinformation campaigns by supporters of the Trump administration including Netanyahu and other Zionists.

The DNC have never, will never, support Genocide. Genocide is the eradication of a demographic of people, which is the explicit stance of the Trump administration alone. Joe Biden's administration pushed for ceasefire, threatened Netanyahu constantly with loss of support, built aid distribution networks to feed Palestinians.

https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/

Biden didn't push for a ceasefire at all. He continuously shipped weapons to israel and even bypassed congress to ship weapons to them. He temporarily paused a single shipment of 2,000 pound bombs, said he was "frustrated" with netanyahu while still doing everything he wanted, and he had a floating pier built that let limited amounts of aid through instead of telling israel to let aid through on-ground. This was apparently enough to fool people like you into thinking biden was serious about helping the Palestinians. If he was serious about stopping the genocide, he could've simply stopped all shipments of weapons to israel (you know, the ones carrying out the genocide). This is so basic and obvious that I'm surprised you try to argue otherwise.

Amount of aid increased after the pier was built. All Aid cut off completely for months when Trump entered office.

The amount of aid technically increased but was not nearly enough and would've been much more easily and quickly satisfied by simply telling israel to let aid through on-ground instead of this ridiculous workaround.

This is the strategy that democrats always use to justify carrying out heinous acts, just like how biden was instrumental in creating the student loan crisis and then decades later forgiving a tiny fraction of that debt so that supporters can point to that and proudly proclaim "see, he's doing something!"

People who did not vote for Harris chose more death and suffering, to kill Palestinians, simple as.

The solution to hitler is not hitler-lite.

How is your solution to Hitler being Hitler panning out? Can't believe I'm even wasting time arguing with supporters of Hitler.

You're the one assuming there must be always be a hitler.

Care to explain yourself? Lol

Is Trump genuinely buying time for Palestine?

Hows that USAID working out for all those people. Show me where kamela said she was goung to bulldoze it all expell all the palesrinians and cover the place in condos. You are part of the problem and why trump is in office now.

What are the first four words in my post.

What are the first four words in my post

And trump is going to do it himself AND replace it all with condos WHILE expelling every single palestinian there.

How are they able to do that with Trump in office, but they wouldn't if Harris was in office?

So you're saying that Trump's actions are buying time for Palestinians.

So you're saying that Trump is a better alternative to Harris?

No thats not what that article says. Youre as bad as the maga crowd with this shit

Yeah well none of that is going to happen and even more people will suffer beyond palestinians. But fuck them right. Cause the only ones that matter are palestinians