| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Security |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
codeinabox
programming.dev
codeinabox@programming.devJoined: 2025-09-29 |
|
||
| 13 Original | |||
Kissaki
programming.dev
Kissaki@programming.devJoined: 2023-06-11 |
Not updating with audit would work if every direct and transient dependency provided security updates for every version. But they don't. Often, security updates are for the most recent version or versions, and if you're far behind, you now have to audit a lot more. Transient dependencies are an audit problem, too. To audit something, you have to essentially audit recursively. Many libs use many other libs of varied authors. Our systems are too open, too vulnerable. A build or check being able to access all resources is a fundamental systematic vulnerability. |
||
| 4 | |||
__反いじめ戦隊
ani.social
AntiBullyRanger@ani.socialJoined: 2025-02-02 |
I used to be a developer, and I completely agree. I don't owe anyone anything. And if you won't compensate me for work you demand, the less I am willing to cover your mistake. “Supply-chain” is an invented capitalist digressive term that they forwent compensation for security. No pay, no game. Edit! |
||
| 1 | |||
|
bitfucker
programming.dev
bitfucker@programming.dev Joined: 2024-03-28 |
This is an interesting perspective. I have not thought about this even as a developer. |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |