| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» CartographyAnarchy
Page 2 of 2 Goto page « First Previous 1, 2 |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
lemmy.world
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-18 |
Damn that's gorgeous! Geometric perfection.
But not a geometrical perfect triangle. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Resonosity
lemmy.dbzer0.com
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2024-07-21 |
But not a geometrical perfect triangle.
Depends on your chosen space. Spherical geometry would work no? |
||
| 2 | |||
|
modus
lemmy.world
modus@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-12 |
At first I thought that was a sea serpent next to it and wondered if this map was actually older than 1858. Or do they still exist? |
||
| 2 | |||
|
howrar
lemmy.ca
howrar@lemmy.ca Joined: 2023-06-04 |
aw fuck did i leave my serious face on
It doesn't transmit well through text unfortunately. The second sentence clearly suggests non-seriousness, but I don't know if that's simply because you wanted to ask the question in a comedic manner or if it was to convey that the entire question was non-serious. Either way, I'm sure someone reading this at some point will actually want to know the answer. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
credo
lemmy.world
credo@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-02-22 |
Great, now I'm wet.
It’s not that kind of party luv. |
||
| 1 | |||
egrets
lemmy.world
egrets@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
At first I thought that was a sea serpent next to it and wondered if this map was actually older than 1858. Or do they still exist?
Hah, it's the "S" of "BARNSTABLE COUNTY", but I've got no proof that it's not positioned to hide a leviathan. |
||
| 3 | |||
Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ
piefed.zip
Sxan@piefed.zipJoined: 2025-06-18 |
Good finds! Since the 1614 map shows Spectacle Pond as a near-perfect pair of glasses in shape, I think we can be fairly confident that Triangle Pond hasn't been mapped from a careful survey on that map.
Oh, for sure. Þe oþer similar period map is less stylized, þough, and it also shows a triangle. Perhaps surveys weren't accurate and naming followed perception, but it appears þe lake has been changing over time and I believe it's entirely possible it was more triangular when it was named. |
||
| -3 | |||
egrets
lemmy.world
egrets@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
Oh, for sure. Þe oþer similar period map is less stylized, þough, and it also shows a triangle. Perhaps surveys weren't accurate and naming followed perception, but it appears þe lake has been changing over time and I believe it's entirely possible it was more triangular when it was named.
Which is odd, because the second map looks to be from at least 1890, and therefore newer than my map!
|
||
| 1 | |||
|
technocrit
lemmy.dbzer0.com
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2024-02-19 |
It's probably just shrinking. In a few years it'll be triangle puddle. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
_stranger_
lemmy.world
_stranger_@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-02 |
Objectively worse. Get your shit together triangle pond. |
||
| 1 | |||
tigeruppercut
lemmy.zip
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zipJoined: 2023-08-20 |
What are all those Percival and James type names for? |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Routhinator
lemmy.ca
Routhinator@lemmy.ca Joined: 2026-02-02 |
But not a geometrical perfect triangle.
Just rename to Triangular Pond and call it a day. |
||
| 2 | |||
egrets
lemmy.world
egrets@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
What are all those Percival and James type names for?
I'd guess it's the owners of homesteads / houses. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
save_the_humans
leminal.space
save_the_humans@leminal.space Joined: 2024-07-12 |
Depends on your chosen space. Spherical geometry would work no?
This pond would probably fit pretty nice on the right hyperbola |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
lemmy.world
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-18 |
Depends on your chosen space. Spherical geometry would work no?
True. A big enough triangle (or a small enough Earth) would show a curve. But I think it's convex, not concave. |
||
| 1 | |||
Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ
piefed.zip
Sxan@piefed.zipJoined: 2025-06-18 |
Which is odd, because the second map looks to be from at least 1890, and therefore newer than my map!
Cartographers be lazy? |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 2 of 2
Goto page
« First
Previous
1, 2
Back to top |