| Post Reply | RetroFed Forums Forum Index
» PieFed Meta
Page 2 of 2 Goto page « First Previous 1, 2 |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Rimu
Moderator
rimu@piefed.socialJoined: 2024-01-04 |
No, not yet :frowning: I wonder why. I'm using one in this post so I can compare... No clue! They look the same! Mine has an id, but I don't think that'd make a difference...
On the PieFed side, |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Joined: 2025-08-14 |
On the PieFed side, : frowning : is not being converted because PF ignores the tag entirely and relies on daily polling of lemmy/api/v3/site to get lists of emojis, which is a bit crap for NodeBB. More work needed!
Happy to take a look in the AM, it's nearly midnight here. I'm confident I'll be able to figure out why NodeBB can't load your emoji at least. As for mine, the emoji itself is transmitted with the activity. It's just how Mastodon does it so I mimicked their implementation. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Joined: 2025-08-14 |
Happy to take a look in the AM, it's nearly midnight here. I'm confident I'll be able to figure out why NodeBB can't load your emoji at least. As for mine, the emoji itself is transmitted with the activity. It's just how Mastodon does it so I mimicked their implementation.
Got it :smile:
|
||
| 1 | |||
|
erer
lemmy.zip
erer@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-06-13 |
Yes I understand that concern. To clarify a bit - when someone deletes their post, who authored it is no longer visible and the body of the post is no longer visible. Only the title remains, and the comments on the post. That should remove all visible association between the author and the post and any accidental self-doxing, etc would tend to be in the body, which will no longer be visible. Ad...
Ok, that is more clear, maybe you should add that to the description because with the current way it's written it seems as if the whole post and author are still visible to anyone with the link. |
||
| 1 | |||
silver
das-eck.haus
silver@das-eck.hausJoined: 2025-10-31 |
This release is a bit smaller than usual but also only 2 weeks since 1.4. I'm planning on doing smaller, more frequent and more focussed releases in future.
Sorry if this is in the docs and I just missed it, but would I run into any problems upgrading straight to v1.5.x from v1.2.x? Or should I do a checkout and ./deploy-docker.sh for each minor version? |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 2 of 2
Goto page
« First
Previous
1, 2
Back to top |