| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » AskHistorians |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Don_Dickle
lemmy.world
Patnou@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-11-30 |
I am sure it was different back then but how did it evolve from just hurtful speech to something you can get arrested for? Is there like a time line of cases or incidents or something???? |
||
| 7 Original | |||
|
Return_of_Chippy
lemmy.world
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-04-28 |
You could be drawn and quartered for saying the king smells bad. Romans also had slaves so I'd imagine the slaves weren't free to speak their minds lol. Protected speech among the common folk is a very new thing and relatively rare even now. |
||
| 3 | |||
PugJesus
Moderator
PugJesus@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-03-24 |
Pre-modern societies often took words very seriously. The Romans didn't have a robust sense of being arrested, per se, but purely verbal harassment and threats were treated the same as physical battery that didn't cause permanent injury - as a cause for a lawsuit and fines/damages to be taken from the offending party. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Mugita Sokio
lemmy.today
msokiovt@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-10-10 |
[deleted]
|
||
| -5 | |||
PugJesus
Moderator
PugJesus@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-03-24 |
[deleted]
That's... not even close to true. |
||
| 2 | |||
TrickDacy
lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-27 |
However, hurtful speech was supposed to be protected since America had its start, though I later found out that 1A protected practicing Catholics, and completely ignored Protestants (making the latter slaves to the former). That's... not even close to true.
Yeah that dude has some pretty intense issues. Everything in life makes them think of Jesuits, Catholics, and their "producer". 😬 |
||
| 3 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |