RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Search Categories Forum list Register Log in
About RetroFed
RetroFed

Welcome to the nostalgia-filled piefed instance of yesteryear.

Open Registration with Application questionnaire.

If you have a question or comment you can post in !meta@retrofed.com or message @DosDude@retrofed.com or @Die4Ever@retrofed.com

In case of downtime and/or emergency, we will post updates on @DosDude@mastodon.social

Some rules we try to uphold:

  • Be civil. Bigotry is not welcome. This includes (but is not limited to): transphobia, queerphobia, racism, ageism and ableism. We do not promote hate.
  • Communities need to be Retro or Retro-adjacent.
  • Please don't upload pornographic content. (use an external image host for that)
75 registered users
Administrators: DosDude, Die4Ever
Visit retrofed.com
Is webp inferior to jpg?
Post Reply RetroFed Forum Forum Index » It's A Digital Disease!
AuthorMessage
Lemmit.Online bot Bot bot@lemmit.online
Joined: 2023-06-18
Quote

Link: https://old.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/1thpnhl/is_webp_inferior_to_jpg/
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/datahoarder by /u/robotisland on 2026-05-19 15:03:17+00:00.

It's often no longer possible to download jpg files from a website; they've been replaced by webp files.

Is the webp version of a file inferior to the jpg version?

Is there a reliable way to download the jpg version instead of the webp version?

Png files have also been replaced by webp files. Since png is a lossless format and webp isn't, webp files are inferior to png files, right?
1   Original
Post Reply
Back to top
Powered by PieFed · PieBB frontend · All times are Europe/Amsterdam