| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » WomensStuff |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
LadyButterfly she/her
piefed.blahaj.zone
LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zoneJoined: 2025-06-10 |
|
||
| 21 Original | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
When a man lets a woman go to work and the man stays home. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Kayday
lemmy.world
Kayday@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-10-22 |
Bad chivalry: putting women on a pedestal, and preventing them from getting down. |
||
| 10 | |||
|
velma
lemmy.blahaj.zone
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2026-03-19 |
Being treated with respect. Being given the benefit of the doubt. Being given the space to thrive and live the way I desire. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
PunnyName
lemmy.world
PunnyName@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-27 |
When a man lets a woman go to work and the man stays home.
Lets? |
||
| 5 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
Lets?
Choose a word that I can use instead of lets that has a similar meaning but doesn’t go down the direction you’re trying to take this, because that wasn’t the intention. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
velma
lemmy.blahaj.zone
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2026-03-19 |
Choose a word that I can use instead of lets that has a similar meaning but doesn’t go down the direction you’re trying to take this, because that wasn’t the intention.
I understood what you originally meant, for what it's worth. Maybe "When a man is comfortable enough in his own masculinity that his partner being the breadwinner isn't an issue." or something like that. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
I understood what you originally meant, for what it's worth. Maybe "When a man is comfortable enough in his own masculinity that his partner being the breadwinner isn't an issue." or something like that.
How can we do it without subtle jabs to masculinity? Everyone should be equal |
||
| 4 | |||
|
velma
lemmy.blahaj.zone
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2026-03-19 |
How can we do it without subtle jabs to masculinity? Everyone should be equal
Oh I didn't think that was a jab at masculinity. Masculinity can be positive and men and women can express masculinity. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
Oh I didn't think that was a jab at masculinity. Masculinity can be positive and men and women can express masculinity.
Well, using the word chivalry in 2026 is pretty sexist imo. The definition is more knightly in origin, with another example being men courteous to women. Clearly from another time. I think we can just retire this word—o😚OP seems to be asking for a semantic shift to an already established word. 🤷♂️ |
||
| 4 | |||
|
velma
lemmy.blahaj.zone
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2026-03-19 |
Well, using the word chivalry in 2026 is pretty sexist imo. The definition is more knightly in origin, with another example being men courteous to women. Clearly from another time. I think we can just retire this word—o😚OP seems to be asking for a semantic shift to an already established word. 🤷♂️
Absolutely agree on the word chivalry being outdated. Word evolution and etymology are always interesting topics to banter about. Chivalry clearly has a different modern definition than it's origins. Maybe we could help redefine it further? Or come up with another way of expressing something similar. Like, I think women can be chivalrous. Does that inherently balance the definition or is chivalry always considered a male trait? |
||
| 5 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
Absolutely agree on the word chivalry being outdated. Word evolution and etymology are always interesting topics to banter about. Chivalry clearly has a different modern definition than it's origins. Maybe we could help redefine it further? Or come up with another way of expressing something similar. Like, I think women can be chivalrous. Does that inherently balance the definition or is chival...
I don’t think the modern definition is clear at all. Which is why we are here. I think the word should be decommissioned, as well as the concept of any gender treating any other gender differently than they would treat their own. If someone asks, “how should a man treat a woman?” The answer should always be, “like a man would treat a man.” Maybe I’m just too damn chivalrous. ;) |
||
| 3 | |||
|
velma
lemmy.blahaj.zone
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2026-03-19 |
I don’t think the modern definition is clear at all. Which is why we are here. I think the word should be decommissioned, as well as the concept of any gender treating any other gender differently than they would treat their own. If someone asks, “how should a man treat a woman?” The answer should always be, “like a man would treat a man.” Maybe I’m just too damn chivalrous. ;)
I just said the modern version is clearly different, not that the definition itself is clear. ....Do you think I'm arguing with you? I don't agree that being chivalrous inherently means treating different genders differently. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
I just said the modern version is clearly different, not that the definition itself is clear. ....Do you think I'm arguing with you? I don't agree that being chivalrous inherently means treating different genders differently.
I didn’t mean to sound as if this was an argument. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
velma
lemmy.blahaj.zone
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2026-03-19 |
I didn’t mean to sound as if this was an argument.
Ok cool, just checking. It's hard to read tone in text and sometimes I misjudge it! |
||
| 3 | |||
𝙈𝙞𝙖
quokk.au
Quokka@quokk.auJoined: 2025-06-09 |
A concept I don’t value. |
||
| 3 | |||
LadyButterfly she/her
Moderator
LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zoneJoined: 2025-06-10 |
Being treated with respect. Being given the benefit of the doubt. Being given the space to thrive and live the way I desire.
The last sentence says it all for me |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Taleya
aussie.zone
Taleya@aussie.zone Joined: 2023-06-21 |
Putting in the effort to serve others in various ways when you don't have to. |
||
| 3 | |||
ZDL
lazysoci.al
ZDL@lazysoci.alJoined: 2025-06-06 |
How can we do it without subtle jabs to masculinity? Everyone should be equal
This weird over-sensitivity made me suspicious. So I looked. And I unsurprisingly found.
Dude. It's literally two words. Which one did you not understand? |
||
| 4 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
This weird over-sensitivity made me suspicious. So I looked. And I unsurprisingly found. I’m a tall male, so if you aren’t you might enjoy a lower dose more. Dude. It's literally two words. Which one did you not understand?
I don’t understand. I was prescribed 5mg at first, and it was less effective than 10mg. I felt it was not working. I’m just sharing my experience. Being that I’m a a larger individual, it takes a higher dose of most things. They might start lower for them—but I don’t want them to write it off if they aren’t experiencing positive results immediately. I’m curious what wild imaginary journey you are on that brought you to harassing me. What completely fabricated reality are you experiencing that you feel your comments are acceptable? |
||
| 1 | |||
ZDL
lazysoci.al
ZDL@lazysoci.alJoined: 2025-06-06 |
I don’t understand. I was prescribed 5mg at first, and it was less effective than 10mg. I felt it was not working. I’m just sharing my experience. Being that I’m a a larger individual, it takes a higher dose of most things. They might start lower for them—but I don’t want them to write it off if they aren’t experiencing positive results immediately. I’m curious what wild imaginary journey you a...
You are literally posting in a group whose very first fucking rule is "women only". And now having had this pointed out to you, instead of shutting the fuck up, you persist in posting against the rules. Telling you you're in breach of the rules of the group you're posting to is not "harassment". It's telling you you're breaking the rules. You utter berk. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
You are literally posting in a group whose very first fucking rule is "women only". And now having had this pointed out to you, instead of shutting the fuck up, you persist in posting against the rules. Telling you you're in breach of the rules of the group you're posting to is not "harassment". It's telling you you're breaking the rules. You utter berk.
Huh, sidebar isn’t my thing on mobile. I just go down the list. I’ll block the community just for you. My apologies to everyone except this person, who is being a—dick. ;) Goodnight! |
||
| 1 | |||
ZDL
lazysoci.al
ZDL@lazysoci.alJoined: 2025-06-06 |
Huh, sidebar isn’t my thing on mobile. I just go down the list. I’ll block the community just for you. My apologies to everyone except this person, who is being a—dick. ;) Goodnight!
And still, after you see the rules yourself, in your client, you post to a group in which the rules specifically say you SHOULD NOT POST. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
melsaskca
lemmy.ca
melsaskca@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-03-09 |
Kind of like honour. Standing up for those who cannot stand up for themselves. Seeing situations where help or assistance is needed and doing so. Traditionally it's Knight's helping damsels, but we're in a different world and people of all stripes sometimes need a bit of a hand to set them upright again. Caring and empathy are requirements for this type of behaviour. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
kibblebits
quokk.au
kibblebits@quokk.au Joined: 2026-05-19 |
And still, after you see the rules yourself, in your client, you post to a group in which the rules specifically say you SHOULD NOT POST.
I didn’t post. I commented. Still, after you shut up I will never see this community again. |
||
| 3 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |