I don't get it

Oh I think it's a reference on Artemis 2

I love your posts

Dawn of the first day

-72 hours remain-

But isn't that supposed to be Artemis 2 in the first panels? What's the third panel referencing? Who's the child?

Maybe it's the astronaut, being back on earth

Being back in space? I didn't hear about them returning to space, didn't they just got home?

Bring back on earth and they see each other through the window, so it wasn't a good bye forever.

I think the child is supposed to be a future astronaut.

Is that a threat?

Sounds like a threat to me.

That child in the third panel is supposed to be one of the astronauts? I don't think he's qualified.

Then it's not that soon, also the kid wouldn't have any clue what the moon is talking about since the first part was said to someone else. Don't get me wrong, it's cute af, it just doesn't make sense.

It's the artist's style, check some of their other works, it's cute and wholesome and most other works are more clear.

Oh yeah, undeniably cute, just needs a second draft

Depends from whose perspective you're setting it from. 30 years for the moon is very, very soon.

Exactly, the whole thing is so ambiguous it makes no sense.