"those queers are exposing our children to too much sex"

Not charged with sexual assault or something similar? This person belongs on a sex offender list and I'm afraid he'll get off easy because Ohio. His photo should be shared far and wide so any time he walks in to public someone points and yells so people can guard their skirts and hide their children.

Yeah, that will keep children safe.

Jesus christ.

What the fuck is wrong with people!!!

Trans women need to team up with us trans men when out in public. I get plenty of shit, but no one will dare fuck with me because I’m a bodybuilder as well.

☠️

TRANS People are PEDOPHILES because CISGENDER Men are EXPOSING Genitals to Children!

:3 this is a great idea!

After several verbal warnings, one officer deployed a stun gun, striking the suspect.

Lmfao okay, cop achievement unlocked for finally tazing someone when they absolutely deserve it. No way the ohio cops knew it was a trans woman that was the victim when they did it, obviously, but still l m a o

After several verbal warnings, one officer deployed a stun gun, striking the suspect. He immediately fell to the ground, according to the police report.

I'm looking forward to seeing the body cam footage of the transphobe doing an uncontrolled faceplant onto the asphalt parking lot.

It must have been spectacular...

Commenting in hopes someone finds the video

Well, how else is he supposed to protect the children from perverts?

/S

So the charge of 'public indecency' is the ohio law that pertains to the exposure of ones private parts, in this case exposing another person's parts. The only other ohio sex crime that I can see that might fit the bill is called 'sexual imposition.' That is the crime of unwanted sexual contact in ohio law. But the definition of sexual contract doesn't exactly match what is described in the article:

"Sexual contact" means any touching of an erogenous zone of another, including without limitation the thigh, genitals, buttock, pubic region, or, if the person is a female, a breast, for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying either person.

I imagine they didn't bring this charge because it wasn't clear that direct sexual contact had been made or that it was for sexual arousal or gratification, but rather humiliation.

If the guy has had any other sex crime convictions previously and the specific section of the indecent exposure they're charging him on now is 2907.09 (B)(4), i.e. exposure to minors 10+ years younger than the offender, "with the purpose of personal sexual arousal or gratification or to lure the minor into sexual activity," then they would be registered as Tier 1 sex offenders for the exposure. I doubt they'll use that section, though, as, again, arousal and gratification doesn't seem to have been the reason he did it. Seems like he was seeking to humiliate above all.

🙋‍♂️ I can offer being slower than you if we need to run

I'm not any flavor of LGBT+, but I have got yall's backs. I'm a wealthy, Christian, cishet man. My little sister is a trans woman and one of my daughters is a gay woman (she chooses to be called a gay woman, as opposed to a lesbian). Anyone coming for the LGBT+ community is actively attacking my family, and I will treat them appropriately.

Not trans myself, but I've turned myself into the bouncer at a few gay/lesbian/lgbtq friendly bars, when a bigot rolled in.

Hell even in mostly straight bars, I've gotten a few shady dudes trying to slip a roofie thrown out.

They're almost always wimps, even when they're stacked compared to my twink/twunk ass.

You just make a big enough of a fuss, what're they gonna do, hit you, stab you, shoot you? Go ahead and make my day.

Ain't killed me yet.

Okay, now tase him again so the rest of his face needs bandages. Asshole.

If they keep this up for a few years and stop everything else, then we might have a redeemed police department. One. Singular.