I fell to sleep bro. I posted this at night.

Accidental double post.

Normality is subjective. Normativity is often used as an excuse for hatred. I do not like to use the word normal.

As for points two and three, okay. Fair enough. You make a valid point about who it could attract. I meant no malintent. It was simply a miscommunication. What do you suggest I change it to?

I would not mind a space that recognizes the abandonment of conservative principles by the republican party and tried to get back to principles that have been chipped away at since nixon. If it considers conservatism the deficits don't matter voodoo economics and stuff right up to maga. whelp then I will just block it.

The GOP has not been conservative for a long time.

hm. so im hearing that you're in favor of freedom to engage with, change, or not engage with traditions. This is the same position as is held by people who call themselves liberals and especially leftists of various types.

you are religious, but so are people all across the political spectrum, so that doesn't require conservatism on its own. you also don't seem to push your religion on anyone else.

you are clearly worried about the planet and ecology but don't tie it to a specific ethnic group, like when the right takes it up as an excuse to exclude others (e.g. Malthusian perspectives, ecofascism). an earnestly ecological outlook I've seen mostly in the center and on the left.

I think your positions make you more of a leftist. maybe you've been shown the left or individual leftists in a bad light... that happens a lot in media. or maybe you live in a former Soviet bloc country, which makes the left in general and "socialism" especially look bad (though I'd argue the ussr wasn't doing socialism).

if you're curious at all, I'd be glad to give you some materials on leftist positions as they actually are and not as they are portrayed by the right and the center.

This will be fascinating and amusing to see collapse

That and religion.

Not sure you can say religion is a conservative value in itself. Some forms of religion lend themselves to conservatism, because of the values they espouse. But you'd have to look at those particular values to find the conservatism, not just a blanket "religion". I suspect you have a particular form of religion in mind. Are Wiccans conservative? Buddhists? Satanists?

As for the rest, it's environmentalism, not conservatism. You'll find fewer conservatives who want to conserve ecosystems than non-conservatives. Conservatism doesn't mean conserving stuff in general, and in fact "keep stuff" would be either meaningless or foolish as a philosophy.

Conservatism's distinctive feature is that it wants to conserve entrenched privilege, wealth, and power structures. And where those are harmful, oppressive, or exploitative, it wants to conserve the harm, the oppression, and the exploitation. Conservatism towards power implies a destructive attitude to many other things.