| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » AskHistorians |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Don_Dickle
lemmy.world
Patnou@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-11-30 |
|
||
| 10 Original | |||
PugJesus
Moderator
PugJesus@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-03-24 |
Two children would have maintained (or nearly maintained) the population, whereas the issue was that Mao encouraging Chinese population growth in the hopes of emerging the dominant power after a nuclear exchange (no, really) had stretched China's resources to the breaking point. After Mao's tenure, birth rates were decreasing, but the Chinese government decided it still wasn't declining fast enough - thus, the one-child policy. The issue is that one child PLUS increasing lifespans meant a larger retired population with a smaller working population to support them. So now China is attempting to get people to have more kids, again. It was implemented largely through the government badgering women pregnant with a second child (or more) to get abortions, and by rescinding social service support from families which had more than one child, and making that threat very known. |
||
| 8 | |||
pressedhams
lemmy.blahaj.zone
pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zoneJoined: 2025-05-13 |
Starvation. |
||
| 3 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |