| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Linguistics |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Classy
sh.itjust.works
Classy@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-10 |
I was discussing this with my fiance, and she agreed with me in that she also speaks English in this manner. I have found that, at least personally, I tend to speak several common homonyms in English in distinct ways: bear/bare, they're/there, where/ware. It's difficult to describe the differences in a concise way, but I'll do my best, and maybe use IPA where applicable, assuming I'm not using them incorrectly? The traditional pronunciation of bare is [ˈbɛr]. I would completely agree with this, and while the dictionary might also say bear is pronounced this way, I would argue that I often hear it more as [ˈber] — a more closed sound with the lips pulled back in a smile. Sure, sometimes people will lazily say both in the same manner, but if I say [ˈber], the listener is going to recognize in a vacuum that I am speaking of the furry mammal, not the term to describe a naked person. Similarly, there is rendered as [ðɚ]. There is a perfect rhyme with bare. I agree with this. However, they're is given the treatment of being a contraction of "they are", and it similarly has that closed sounded [e] instead of [ə]. Am I crazy, or does anyone else out there experience English this way? |
||
| 1 Original | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |