You might get more engagement if the post title indicated what the topic was, and it's inside the post. It gave more details if it was worth reading

For now I have not moved past the point of comprehension being important to me.

Embracing the shift to product manager

I think this document is revisiting the formalization of business processes and acceptance criteria from the '70s, but within the context of generated content and code. If you've ever worked with an offshoring organization, it's pretty much the same thing. Except you're not expecting a human to be in the middle

Interesting comparison, it really does seem like that. Lot of similarities in writing/generating code that technically "works" but is brittle, overengineered, etc.

I think there's no replacement for giving a shit. I saw an interesting link about using AI to write better code more slowly, but that still requires that you care.

I think there’s no replacement for giving a shit.

Everyone in the chain must give a shit, or you will only get shit.

Good idea, though not sure what a good subtitle is in this case. If I add "AI" to the title, it will probably receive drive-by downvotes, which is a hard problem to solve with Lemmy as it is today. I'd rather have a little bit of signal coming from a place of curiosity than lots of noise.

title - Modern Task Management

signal / noise this was also picked up on hackernews - maybe some of the discussion gets split.

Thanks, updated. Not precisely sure what you meant with your latter statement, but just to clarify what I said above, I mean that I'd rather have a little bit of good signal in the conversation here in this community, than lots of noisy comments from the Threadiverse at large.