RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Search Categories Forum list Register Log in
About RetroFed
RetroFed

Welcome to the nostalgia-filled piefed instance of yesteryear.

Open Registration with Application questionnaire.

If you have a question or comment you can post in !meta@retrofed.com or message @DosDude@retrofed.com or @Die4Ever@retrofed.com

In case of downtime and/or emergency, we will post updates on @DosDude@mastodon.social

Some rules we try to uphold:

  • Be civil. Bigotry is not welcome. This includes (but is not limited to): transphobia, queerphobia, racism, ageism and ableism. We do not promote hate.
  • Communities need to be Retro or Retro-adjacent.
  • Please don't upload pornographic content. (use an external image host for that)
74 registered users
Administrators: DosDude, Die4Ever
Visit retrofed.com
Comparing the environmental costs of buying a brand new high-efficiency Mini-lab computer, instead of a used less efficient one.
Post Reply RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Permacomputing
AuthorMessage
ProdigalFrog slrpnk.net ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2023-07-04
Quote

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PisIPpbMkTc

I thought this video was rather interesting, because at 12:27, the presenter crunches the numbers to find out how many years it would take for a new computer purchase to be more environmentally friendly (in regards to total CO2 expended) compared to using a less efficient used model.

Depending on the specific use case, it could take as little as 3 years to breakeven in terms of CO2 if both systems were at max power draw forever, and as long as 30 if the systems are mostly at idle.
1   Original
Post Reply
Back to top
Powered by PieFed · PieBB frontend · All times are Europe/Amsterdam