| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Open Source |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
tracyspcy
lemmy.ml
tracyspcy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2021-01-10 |
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/49444213
|
||
| 16 Original | |||
|
garbage_world
lemmy.world
garbage_world@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-03-18 |
[deleted]
|
||
| 1 | |||
tracyspcy
lemmy.ml
tracyspcy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2021-01-10 |
[deleted]
i don't care about licenses or ip, if you want to use, modify or sell it, you are free to do this, you got my personal permission... |
||
| 3 | |||
Treasure
feddit.org
treasure@feddit.orgJoined: 2024-08-04 |
i don't care about licenses or ip, if you want to use, modify or sell it, you are free to do this, you got my personal permission... anyway, if you here to propose better license , I'm all ears.
Sounds like a perfect use case for the WTFPL. |
||
| 4 | |||
Static_Rocket
lemmy.world
Static_Rocket@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Sounds like a perfect use case for the WTFPL.
Why recommend a license that isn't OSI approved? |
||
| 0 | |||
tracyspcy
lemmy.ml
tracyspcy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2021-01-10 |
Why recommend a license that isn't OSI approved?
so folks, what the correct one? Apache License 2.0? European Union Public License ? GNU Affero General Public License v3.0? |
||
| 2 | |||
ghost_laptop
lemmy.ml
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.mlJoined: 2020-11-25 |
so folks, what the correct one? Apache License 2.0? European Union Public License ? GNU Affero General Public License v3.0?
i'd say if you want to be the most permissive but forcing other people to keep the code they create with your project to still be open source use GNU AGPL3. |
||
| 2 | |||
tracyspcy
lemmy.ml
tracyspcy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2021-01-10 |
i'd say if you want to be the most permissive but forcing other people to keep the code they create with your project to still be open source use GNU AGPL3.
Thx |
||
| 1 | |||
thingsiplay
lemmy.ml
thingsiplay@lemmy.mlJoined: 2026-01-09 |
i don't care about licenses or ip, if you want to use, modify or sell it, you are free to do this, you got my personal permission... anyway, if you here to propose better license , I'm all ears.
I don't think a different license is "needed". |
||
| 2 | |||
Static_Rocket
lemmy.world
Static_Rocket@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-12 |
so folks, what the correct one? Apache License 2.0? European Union Public License ? GNU Affero General Public License v3.0?
MIT is perfectly fine. Most people want something more copyleft to avoid corporate bs. I use GPLv3 to make sure my company doesn't do anything dumb. GPLv2 and MIT are fine if you just want credit. AGPL is also cool, but I normally see it used in client/server configurations to prevent people from hiding the useful stuff under a different service. Anything OSI approved will at least protect you from anything. The other licenses I see floating around usually get in trouble for vague language that can be interpreted in unintended ways. Here's the big book of licenses if you feel like skimming: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html |
||
| 3 | |||
tracyspcy
lemmy.ml
tracyspcy@lemmy.mlJoined: 2021-01-10 |
MIT is perfectly fine. Most people want something more copyleft to avoid corporate bs. I use GPLv3 to make sure my company doesn't do anything dumb. GPLv2 and MIT are fine if you just want credit. AGPL is also cool, but I normally see it used in client/server configurations to prevent people from hiding the useful stuff under a different service. Anything OSI approved will at least protect you ...
Thx for info |
||
| 1 | |||
|
lightrain
forum.storstad.net
lightrain@forum.storstad.net Joined: 2026-02-04 |
so folks, what the correct one? Apache License 2.0? European Union Public License ? GNU Affero General Public License v3.0?
When not sure, this site explains it well: https://choosealicense.com/ |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |