RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Arm64 on the desktop? It’s spendy and it’s sluggish
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Rekall Incorporated piefed.social Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-08
Quote

Even with lots of RAM, GPU, and fast disks, you probably don’t want it

13   Original
zeppo lemmy.world zeppo@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-16
#2 · Quote Reply

I've used ARM Windows 11 on a MacBook in virtualization and it seems fine to me. Even runs x86 games with decent performance.

5
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#3 · Quote Reply

Based on everything described, it sounds more like a lack of support and optimization rather than a fundamental flaw in arm

12
Alex lemmy.ml stsquad@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2023-06-09
#4 · Quote Reply

Based on everything described, it sounds more like a lack of support and optimization rather than a fundamental flaw in arm

Yes. I may be biased but the Arm architecture itself is fine and pretty performant on modern SoCs. Once the system vendors actually manage to ship something without a broken PCIe bus is happily daily drive it.

Hell if I could reliably get EL2 I'd even spring for one of the Snapdragon laptops.

7
Wojwo feddit.online roger.wood@feddit.online
Joined: 2026-03-03
#5 · Quote Reply

"Macromedia Flash support"?!? is this article from the past?

2
AspieEgg lemmy.blahaj.zone AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2023-06-23
#6 · (edited) Quote Reply

"Macromedia Flash support"?!? is this article from the past?

It does mention that those posts were from 2015. Though that still would have been about a decade after Adobe took over.

ETA: Clicking on the post they are referencing, the original author called it Adobe Flash, so not sure why it was changed for this article.

1
Post Reply
Back to top