| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Socialism |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
return2ozma
lemmy.world
return2ozma@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-01 |
|
||
| 12 Original | |||
davel
lemmy.ml
davel@lemmy.mlJoined: 2023-07-08 |
What if the world was made of pudding? |
||
| 10 | |||
|
Archangel1313
lemmy.ca
Archangel1313@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-06-03 |
Just got called a "liberal" and got banned from LateStageCapitalism for suggesting this exact thing. Why are so-called Socialists so against the idea that Socialism might actually become popular among the general population? If I were to consider just their reaction, I would assume they were trying to stop this from happening. Which means they're helping the conservatives keep Socialism out of the mainstream. |
||
| -1 | |||
davel
lemmy.ml
davel@lemmy.mlJoined: 2023-07-08 |
Just got called a "liberal" and got banned from LateStageCapitalism for suggesting this exact thing. Why are so-called Socialists so against the idea that Socialism might actually become popular among the general population? If I were to consider just their reaction, I would assume they were trying to stop this from happening. Which means they're helping the conservatives keep Socialism out of ...
No matter how popular socialism becomes among the proletariat, it still won’t wrest control of the state through the ballot box, because the bourgeoisie would sooner unleash fascism than allow socialism. Bourgeois democracy is a fake democracy. |
||
| 13 | |||
|
danciestlobster
lemmy.zip
danciestlobster@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-06-04 |
What if the world was made of pudding?
Sounds pretty good. I'm in |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Archangel1313
lemmy.ca
Archangel1313@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-06-03 |
No matter how popular socialism becomes among the proletariat, it still won’t wrest control of the state through the ballot box, because the bourgeoisie would sooner unleash fascism than allow socialism. Bourgeois democracy is a fake democracy.
But you can't have a revolution until Socialism is popular among the proletariat. That popularity is expressed and quantified through the ballot box. It isn't until overwhelming public demand for Socialism is denied, that revolution is even possible. Until we are all voting for it, and the establishment says "no"...then there is no possible way it's ever going to happen. So, why stand in the way of that process, by telling people not to vote for it when it is available? You are stalling your own progress. The people's will is not "fake". Acting like we don't understand what we're voting for, is not only counterproductive...it's infantilism. |
||
| 9 | |||
A404
lemmy.dbzer0.com
A404@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2026-04-11 |
What if the world was made of pudding?
Idk, wouldn't it start to rot after a while? |
||
| 5 | |||
Aniki
feddit.org
gandalf_der_12te@feddit.orgJoined: 2024-06-21 |
Sounds pretty good. I'm in
you'd literally be in, knee-deep, as the ground would not be solid enough to hold you |
||
| 1 | |||
davel
lemmy.ml
davel@lemmy.mlJoined: 2023-07-08 |
But you can't have a revolution until Socialism is popular among the proletariat. That popularity is expressed and quantified through the ballot box. It isn't until overwhelming public demand for Socialism is denied, that revolution is even possible. Until we are all voting for it, and the establishment says "no"...then there is no possible way it's ever going to happen. So, why stand in the wa...
I’ve never told anyone not to vote, only that bourgeois democracy can’t be reformed; that the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. |
||
| 3 | |||
Daniel Quinn
lemmy.ca
danielquinn@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-06-07 |
But you can't have a revolution until Socialism is popular among the proletariat. That popularity is expressed and quantified through the ballot box. It isn't until overwhelming public demand for Socialism is denied, that revolution is even possible. Until we are all voting for it, and the establishment says "no"...then there is no possible way it's ever going to happen. So, why stand in the wa...
Thank you for this. It's positively infuriating the way the left keeps eating itself. There is no way the establishment will let socialism take root in the Democratic party, but there's real value in moving the Overton window to the left enough to allow people to see either the benefits of socialist policies or (more likely) the opposition to it. The whole "fuck these guys, they're not revolutionary enough" is a great way to ensure that nothing ever gets done. We should absolutely have red lines though. Some of these candidates already cross them, and even more candidates may be all talk. But shitting all over anyone who dares to do anything other than launch an unpopular resistance is not constructive. |
||
| 3 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |