| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» Science Memes
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next Last » |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
cannedtuna
lemmy.world
cannedtuna@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-21 |
|
||
| 897 Original | |||
massive_bereavement
fedia.io
massive_bereavement@fedia.ioJoined: 2024-06-14 |
Quite ironic. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
MohamedMoney
feddit.org
MohamedMoney@feddit.org Joined: 2024-12-05 |
I canβt quite get over the fact that the premise is false |
||
| 88 | |||
thisbenzingring
lemmy.today
thisbenzingring@lemmy.todayJoined: 2025-11-29 |
Quite ironic.
Only a Fool would have missed this gold |
||
| 6 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
I canβt quite get over the fact that the premise is false
no science teacher would ever say that. Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible... and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved). |
||
| 72 | |||
|
Krudler
lemmy.world
Krudler@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-07 |
no science teacher would ever say that. Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible... and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved).
We can say that spatially, the summation of the photons movement is linear, but everything in the universe is waves and curves and we all know that to be true |
||
| 6 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
We can say that spatially, the summation of the photons movement is linear, but everything in the universe is waves and curves and we all know that to be true
if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric. |
||
| -1 | |||
|
nehal3m
lemmy.zip
nehal3m@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-14 |
I must confess, this sparked a laugh This pointiness, itβs natureβs gaff Give me a siiiiign Fool me baby one more time |
||
| 4 | |||
|
mrsemi
lemmy.world
mrsemi@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-22 |
no science teacher would ever say that. Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible... and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved).
[deleted]
|
||
| 35 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
[deleted]
they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though. space time is curved, not the light path. |
||
| 27 | |||
|
nehal3m
lemmy.zip
nehal3m@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-14 |
[deleted]
Only a Sith! |
||
| 5 | |||
|
Klear
piefed.world
Klear@piefed.world Joined: 2026-05-14 |
[deleted]
In that case that Pyrite proves nothing. |
||
| 3 | |||
Psaldorn
lemmy.world
Psaldorn@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-30 |
Bismuth has joined the chat |
||
| 26 | |||
cannedtuna
lemmy.world
cannedtuna@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-21 |
Bismuth has joined the chat
Straight lines are itβs Bismuth. |
||
| 6 | |||
JoeBigelow
lemmy.ca
JoeBigelow@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-07-06 |
if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric.
Your username has a typo in it |
||
| 2 | |||
JoeBigelow
lemmy.ca
JoeBigelow@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-07-06 |
I canβt quite get over the fact that the premise is false
It's useful as a navigational aid, if you're lost in the woods keeping an eye open for straight lines, especially horizontal, is a good way of finding man made structures and potentially a way out. Beyond that, on a micro scale nature loves perfect geometry. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
bitteroldcoot
piefed.social
bitteroldcoot@piefed.social Joined: 2025-11-22 |
Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes. |
||
| 83 | |||
|
Krudler
lemmy.world
Krudler@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-07 |
if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric.
You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions |
||
| 3 | |||
5ha99y
lemmus.org
5ha99y@lemmus.orgJoined: 2026-05-16 |
I must confess, this sparked a laugh This pointiness, itβs natureβs gaff Give me a siiiiign Fool me baby one more time
As you can see the pyrite is pointy and not pointless |
||
| 2 | |||
|
boonhet
sopuli.xyz
boonhet@sopuli.xyz Joined: 2025-06-16 |
Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.
Think you'd rather catch an art teacher saying that than a scientist tbh. |
||
| 9 | |||
MrSelfDestruct
lemmy.zip
MrSelfDestruct@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-05-15 |
Straight lines are itβs Bismuth.
Is the gas form called Bismeth? |
||
| 5 | |||
MrSelfDestruct
lemmy.zip
MrSelfDestruct@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-05-15 |
Does it still have straight lines under a microscope? |
||
| 6 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
Your username has a typo in it
Don't do drugs. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions
it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature. |
||
| -2 | |||
SystemDisc
feddit.org
SystemDisc@feddit.orgJoined: 2026-05-20 |
they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though. space time is curved, not the light path.
I donβt think thatβs right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly |
||
| -1 | |||
|
Maldreamer
lemmy.world
Maldreamer@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-10 |
I donβt think thatβs right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly
But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer? |
||
| 24 | |||
SystemDisc
feddit.org
SystemDisc@feddit.orgJoined: 2026-05-20 |
But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer?
Hmm, Iβm not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If weβre talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but Iβm not a theoretical physicist. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
I donβt think thatβs right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly
gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity). |
||
| 12 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
Hmm, Iβm not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If weβre talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but Iβm not a theoretical physicist.
"through vacuum" |
||
| 11 | |||
|
Floodedwomb
lemmy.world
Floodedwomb@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-09-05 |
Is the gas form called Bismeth?
Bizmist |
||
| 4 | |||
OozingPositron
feddit.cl
OozingPositron@feddit.clJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.
>nobody |
||
| 43 | |||
|
bitteroldcoot
piefed.social
bitteroldcoot@piefed.social Joined: 2025-11-22 |
>nobody You should be slapped as well then.
Well itβs about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit. |
||
| 40 | |||
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
Bizmist
Bizmuthnβt |
||
| 3 | |||
SystemDisc
feddit.org
SystemDisc@feddit.orgJoined: 2026-05-20 |
gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct t...
Makes sense to me. Thanks |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Krudler
lemmy.world
Krudler@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-07 |
it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature.
Counterpoint: shut the fuck up |
||
| -1 | |||
|
Derpenheim
lemmy.zip
Derpenheim@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-03-07 |
[deleted]
But photons are also particles. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
π DrRedOctopus ππ
lemmy.world
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
Counterpoint: shut the fuck up
you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. |
||
| 4 | |||
JoeBigelow
lemmy.ca
JoeBigelow@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-07-06 |
Don't do drugs.
Wayyy to late partner |
||
| 3 | |||
Kangae_Hishiryo
scribe.disroot.org
Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orgJoined: 2026-04-13 |
[deleted]
Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that's because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein's theories). |
||
| 2 | |||
|
hypeerror
sh.itjust.works
hypeerror@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2024-02-01 |
Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.
That explains why the Sith were rarely seen in the sciences. |
||
| 11 | |||
Lucidlethargy
sh.itjust.works
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-28 |
I canβt quite get over the fact that the premise is false
Yeah, it's a very stupid concept made into a very stupid meme to make dumb people feel dopamine over the concept of scientists being allegedly dumber than them. I really hate our species sometimes. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
solidheron
sh.itjust.works
solidheron@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2025-12-29 |
Technically fibers in wood is straight. I want to say ice has straight edges |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Joined: 2023-10-29 |
Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong. |
||
| 19 | |||
|
justaman123
lemmy.world
justaman123@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-12-09 |
Well itβs about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.
For some reason your comment makes me think of this |
||
| 21 | |||
explodicle
sh.itjust.works
explodicle@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2024-04-11 |
Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong. I think it's more of a thing philosophically said when talking about how modern life is so different and unnatural compared to the lives of ancient people or animals.
I wonder if there's any animals who see crystals in nature and think "wow that's a really cool rock". |
||
| 5 | |||
|
Fmstrat
lemmy.world
Fmstrat@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-04-27 |
Well itβs about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.
Ahem... "too". |
||
| 3 | |||
explodicle
sh.itjust.works
explodicle@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2024-04-11 |
We exist within nature, so nature created linear particle accelerators. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
laz
pawb.social
laz@pawb.social Joined: 2023-09-27 |
I wonder if there's any animals who see crystals in nature and think "wow that's a really cool rock".
Birds definitely think this. My local Magpies have definitely attempted bribery with cool rocks and shiny discarded human objects |
||
| 7 | |||
|
glimse
lemmy.world
glimse@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-07 |
I canβt quite get over the fact that the premise is false
Memes like this are so dumb. Laugh tracks for the internet. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
ArcaneSlime
lemmy.dbzer0.com
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2023-06-30 |
Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong. I think it's more of a thing philosophically said when talking about how modern life is so different and unnatural compared to the lives of ancient people or animals.
Tbh, I've only ever heard it when talking about camouflage. And tbf in that context it is somewhat true, you're harder to see if you break up those straight lines. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
TwodogsFighting
lemdro.id
TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id Joined: 2025-07-14 |
Does it still have straight lines if you look really closely? |
||
| 5 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 1 of 3
Goto page
1, 2, 3
Next
Last »
Back to top |