RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
I must con(FeSβ‚‚), this sparked a laugh
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
cannedtuna lemmy.world cannedtuna@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-21
Quote

897   Original
massive_bereavement fedia.io massive_bereavement@fedia.io
Joined: 2024-06-14
#2 · Quote Reply

Quite ironic.

7
MohamedMoney feddit.org MohamedMoney@feddit.org
Joined: 2024-12-05
#3 · Quote Reply

I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

88
thisbenzingring lemmy.today thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-11-29
#4 · Quote Reply

Quite ironic.

Only a Fool would have missed this gold

6
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#5 · Quote Reply

I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

no science teacher would ever say that.

Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible...

and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved).

72
Krudler lemmy.world Krudler@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-07
#6 · Quote Reply

no science teacher would ever say that. Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible... and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved).

We can say that spatially, the summation of the photons movement is linear, but everything in the universe is waves and curves and we all know that to be true

6
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#7 · Quote Reply

We can say that spatially, the summation of the photons movement is linear, but everything in the universe is waves and curves and we all know that to be true

if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality.

as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point.

but then that's too esoteric.

-1
nehal3m lemmy.zip nehal3m@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-04-14
#8 · (edited) Quote Reply

I must confess, this sparked a laugh

This pointiness, it’s nature’s gaff

Give me a siiiiign

Fool me baby one more time

4
mrsemi lemmy.world mrsemi@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-22
#9 · Quote Reply

no science teacher would ever say that. Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible... and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved).
[deleted]
35
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#10 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though.

space time is curved, not the light path.

27
nehal3m lemmy.zip nehal3m@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-04-14
#11 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

Only a Sith!

5
Klear piefed.world Klear@piefed.world
Joined: 2026-05-14
#12 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

In that case that Pyrite proves nothing.

3
Psaldorn lemmy.world Psaldorn@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-30
#13 · Quote Reply

Bismuth has joined the chat

26
cannedtuna lemmy.world cannedtuna@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-21
#14 · Quote Reply

Bismuth has joined the chat

Straight lines are it’s Bismuth.

6
JoeBigelow lemmy.ca JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-07-06
#15 · Quote Reply

if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric.

Your username has a typo in it

2
JoeBigelow lemmy.ca JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-07-06
#16 · Quote Reply

I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

It's useful as a navigational aid, if you're lost in the woods keeping an eye open for straight lines, especially horizontal, is a good way of finding man made structures and potentially a way out. Beyond that, on a micro scale nature loves perfect geometry.

4
bitteroldcoot piefed.social bitteroldcoot@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-11-22
#17 · Quote Reply

Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.

83
Krudler lemmy.world Krudler@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-07
#18 · Quote Reply

if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric.

You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions

3
5ha99y lemmus.org 5ha99y@lemmus.org
Joined: 2026-05-16
#19 · Quote Reply

I must confess, this sparked a laugh This pointiness, it’s nature’s gaff Give me a siiiiign Fool me baby one more time

As you can see the pyrite is pointy and not pointless

2
boonhet sopuli.xyz boonhet@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2025-06-16
#20 · Quote Reply

Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.

Think you'd rather catch an art teacher saying that than a scientist tbh.

9
MrSelfDestruct lemmy.zip MrSelfDestruct@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-05-15
#21 · Quote Reply

Straight lines are it’s Bismuth.

Is the gas form called Bismeth?

5
MrSelfDestruct lemmy.zip MrSelfDestruct@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-05-15
#22 · Quote Reply

Does it still have straight lines under a microscope?

6
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#23 · Quote Reply

Your username has a typo in it

Don't do drugs.

2
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#24 · Quote Reply

You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions

it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers.

I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature.

-2
SystemDisc feddit.org SystemDisc@feddit.org
Joined: 2026-05-20
#25 · (edited) Quote Reply

they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though. space time is curved, not the light path.

I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly

-1
Maldreamer lemmy.world Maldreamer@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-10
#26 · Quote Reply

I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly

But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer?

24
SystemDisc feddit.org SystemDisc@feddit.org
Joined: 2026-05-20
#27 · Quote Reply

But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer?

Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist.

4
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#28 · (edited) Quote Reply

I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly

gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself.

light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight.

like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium.

Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity).

12
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#29 · Quote Reply

Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist.

"through vacuum"

11
Floodedwomb lemmy.world Floodedwomb@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-09-05
#30 · Quote Reply

Is the gas form called Bismeth?

Bizmist

4
OozingPositron feddit.cl OozingPositron@feddit.cl
Joined: 2023-06-12
#31 · Quote Reply

Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.

>nobody
You should be slapped as well then.

43
bitteroldcoot piefed.social bitteroldcoot@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-11-22
#32 · Quote Reply

>nobody You should be slapped as well then.

Well it’s about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.

40
Optional lemmy.world homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-09
#33 · Quote Reply

Bizmist

Bizmuthn’t

3
SystemDisc feddit.org SystemDisc@feddit.org
Joined: 2026-05-20
#34 · Quote Reply

gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct t...

Makes sense to me. Thanks

2
Krudler lemmy.world Krudler@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-07
#35 · Quote Reply

it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature.

Counterpoint: shut the fuck up

-1
Derpenheim lemmy.zip Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-03-07
#36 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

But photons are also particles.

2
πŸ‰ DrRedOctopus πŸ™πŸ‰ lemmy.world IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-29
#37 · Quote Reply

Counterpoint: shut the fuck up

you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective.

4
JoeBigelow lemmy.ca JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-07-06
#38 · Quote Reply

Don't do drugs.

Wayyy to late partner

3
Kangae_Hishiryo scribe.disroot.org Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
Joined: 2026-04-13
#39 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that's because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein's theories).

2
hypeerror sh.itjust.works hypeerror@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-02-01
#40 · Quote Reply

Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.

That explains why the Sith were rarely seen in the sciences.

11
Lucidlethargy sh.itjust.works Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-28
#41 · Quote Reply

I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

Yeah, it's a very stupid concept made into a very stupid meme to make dumb people feel dopamine over the concept of scientists being allegedly dumber than them.

I really hate our species sometimes.

1
solidheron sh.itjust.works solidheron@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-12-29
#42 · Quote Reply

Technically fibers in wood is straight.

I want to say ice has straight edges

3
Draconic NEO mander.xyz Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz
Joined: 2023-10-29
#43 · Quote Reply

Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong.
I think it's more of a thing philosophically said when talking about how modern life is so different and unnatural compared to the lives of ancient people or animals.

19
justaman123 lemmy.world justaman123@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-12-09
#44 · Quote Reply

Well it’s about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.

For some reason your comment makes me think of this

21
explodicle sh.itjust.works explodicle@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-04-11
#45 · Quote Reply

Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong. I think it's more of a thing philosophically said when talking about how modern life is so different and unnatural compared to the lives of ancient people or animals.

I wonder if there's any animals who see crystals in nature and think "wow that's a really cool rock".

5
Fmstrat lemmy.world Fmstrat@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-04-27
#46 · Quote Reply

Well it’s about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.

Ahem... "too".

3
explodicle sh.itjust.works explodicle@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-04-11
#47 · Quote Reply

We exist within nature, so nature created linear particle accelerators.

3
laz pawb.social laz@pawb.social
Joined: 2023-09-27
#48 · Quote Reply

I wonder if there's any animals who see crystals in nature and think "wow that's a really cool rock".

Birds definitely think this. My local Magpies have definitely attempted bribery with cool rocks and shiny discarded human objects

7
glimse lemmy.world glimse@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-07
#49 · Quote Reply

I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

Memes like this are so dumb. Laugh tracks for the internet.

4
ArcaneSlime lemmy.dbzer0.com ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2023-06-30
#50 · Quote Reply

Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong. I think it's more of a thing philosophically said when talking about how modern life is so different and unnatural compared to the lives of ancient people or animals.

Tbh, I've only ever heard it when talking about camouflage. And tbf in that context it is somewhat true, you're harder to see if you break up those straight lines.

2
TwodogsFighting lemdro.id TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id
Joined: 2025-07-14
#51 · Quote Reply

Does it still have straight lines if you look really closely?

5
Post Reply Page 1 of 3   Goto page 1, 2, 3 Last »
Back to top