Link: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1uv2974/this_dr_phil_thing_looks_like_tom_delonge_20_to_me/

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/WideAwakeTravels on 2026-07-13 05:17:29+00:00.

I want to make a couple of points here:

This whole Dr. Phil thing looks like Tom Delonge 2.0 to me. Some people have accused Lue Elizondo and co. of deciding to choose a celebrity who will help them with limited disclosure some years ago, and they chose Tom Delonge. The goal was to talk about UFOs and that they are real and that we are being visited by non human intelligences, but not to talk about crash retrieval and backengineering programs. Also, push the national security issue/threat narrative. The plan was for Hillary Clinton to be the limited disclosure president, but she didn't win, so they had to pivot. David Grusch also side stepped them because he testified that there are crash retrieval and backengineering programs.

Now we see Dr. Phil who is talking about the same things. He is saying that he was given early access to the 4th tranche of data and that UFOs are real and are flying around and the government has been hiding that from us, but no mention of crash retrieval and backengineering programs. He's also talking about UFOs visiting our nuclear sites, which is the national security issue/threat narrative. It looks like they are using the same playbook as with Tom Delonge, but now during the Trump administration. I'm not even blaming Dr. Phil. He's just parroting what they told him. It would be interesting to know if Lue had anything to do with it. He did send a letter to Trump asking him to appoint a UAP czar. It's also very interesting that Neal DeGrasse Tyson did a 180 on the UFO subject recently, after mocking the people in the UFO community for so many years. Is he another celebrity who got chosen?

Also, Avi Loeb and Hal Puthoff, during a recent interview, were both saying how we should not focus on the past and we should focus on the future and gather new data. That just doesn't make sense. Why start over from scratch and waste time and money when we should work towards getting our hands on the craft and bodies people already have in possession, allegedly, and finding out what they have learned over the course of the last 80 years? Are the two of them also for limited disclosure? Are they program protectors?