RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Search Categories Forum list Register Log in
About RetroFed
RetroFed

Welcome to the nostalgia-filled piefed instance of yesteryear.

Open Registration with Application questionnaire.

If you have a question or comment you can post in !meta@retrofed.com or message @DosDude@retrofed.com or @Die4Ever@retrofed.com

In case of downtime and/or emergency, we will post updates on @DosDude@mastodon.social

Some rules we try to uphold:

  • Be civil. Bigotry is not welcome. This includes (but is not limited to): transphobia, queerphobia, racism, ageism and ableism. We do not promote hate.
  • Communities need to be Retro or Retro-adjacent.
  • Please don't upload pornographic content. (use an external image host for that)
75 registered users
Administrators: DosDude, Die4Ever
Visit retrofed.com
The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
Post Reply RetroFed Forum Forum Index » 🌱Climate Change🌡⛈
AuthorMessage
Jim East slrpnk.net wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2025-03-28
Quote
Link: https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2026/02/the-climate-science-reference-they-dont-want-judges-to-read/

For the first time, the Federal Judicial Center (FJC) commissioned a chapter on climate science for the manual they put out (with the NASEM) for judges, the Reference on Scientific Evidence (4th Edition). This week, a month after it was published, they pulled the chapter out after being pressured by 27 Republican Attorneys General. You can nonetheless read it here.
1   Original
Post Reply
Back to top
Powered by PieFed · PieBB frontend · All times are Europe/Amsterdam