| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » It's A Digital Disease! |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Lemmit.Online bot
Bot
bot@lemmit.onlineJoined: 2023-06-18 |
![]() Link: https://old.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/1vazbo4/i_imaged_an_old_ssd_with_ddrescue_and_rescued/ This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.The original was posted on /r/datahoarder by /u/A_Time_Space_Person on 2026-07-30 16:57:10+00:00. I imaged an old ~512GB SSD that had been sitting unpowered for 2-3 years. It was the drive of an old laptop running Debian. I imaged it from a live Ubuntu USB onto an external drive. My sequence was roughly: # First pass, skip scraping to grab everything readable fast sudo ddrescue -n /dev/sdb image.img image.mapfile # Second pass, let it scrape the bad areas sudo ddrescue /dev/sdb image.img image.mapfile Final result: 99.99% rescued, about 30 MB of unreadable sectors out of 512 GB. ddrescue reported "Finished." I then computed a SHA-256 of the image. Since then I mounted the image read-only in WSL2, browsed the ext4 root partition, and it seems OK - I haven't hit any missing or corrupt files. My question: some people have suggested I should have run the second pass with a retry count, e.g. -r3. Should I do that? I do plan to wipe the original drive eventually (only after I have multiple verified copies), so if there's a real argument for squeezing out those last sectors while the drive still exists, now's the window. |
||
| 1 Original | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |