RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Dress made out of 'programmable' mycellium. self-repairable, fully compostable
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
keepthepace tarte.nuage-libre.fr keepthepace@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
Joined: 2025-03-25
(edited) Quote

27   Original
eleijeep piefed.social eleijeep@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-09-22
#2 · Quote Reply

This is very cool. I wish they had more images of the type of textiles that could be created with this.

3
dkppunk piefed.social dkppunk@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-11-19
#3 · Quote Reply

All I know is it better have pockets because a dress without pockets is worthless

7
gnufuu lemmy.ca gnufuu@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-06-10
#4 · Quote Reply

"Eat my shorts"

6
ButteryMonkey piefed.social ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-25
#5 · (edited) Quote Reply

Hmm.. if it’s alive, how do you wash it? Or do you just water it and let it eat your dead skin and body oils as nutrients..?

I don't think I like that at all.

(And yes I did read.. about half of this, and skimmed the rest looking for an answer. It’s only about how it works and how it’s made, i don't think they considered that practicality at all for this research, but I may have missed it)

There is a bit about glycerol-plasticization and the chemical solvent resistance resulting, but I'm not really sure how well that translates to household clothes washing, nor the mechanical stresses involved.

All in all very cool, but making clothing from it doesn’t really sound super practical at this point, to me.

2
brisk aussie.zone brisk@aussie.zone
Joined: 2023-08-22
#6 · (edited) Quote Reply

Very cool. I love that they didn't pull punches with the dress design

2
brisk aussie.zone brisk@aussie.zone
Joined: 2023-08-22
#7 · Quote Reply

Hmm.. if it’s alive, how do you wash it? Or do you just water it and let it eat your dead skin and body oils as nutrients..? I don't think I like that at all. (And yes I did read.. about half of this, and skimmed the rest looking for an answer. It’s only about how it works and how it’s made, i don't think they considered that practicality at all for this research, but I may have missed it) Ther...

Briefly addressed in the discussion:

Rather than targeting long-lifetime wearable garments, these materials are more naturally suited to short-term or single-use textile-like systems where environmental sustainability is prioritized. Representative use contexts include biodegradable packaging, temporary exhibition or artistic textiles, and architectural display installations, settings in which conventional materials often persist environmentally despite brief functional lifetimes.

In the context of living textiles, additional metrics such as washability, abrasion resistance, breathability, and wearer comfort have not yet been systematically evaluated and will require further co-optimization of biological and material parameters for practical translation.

3
keepthepace tarte.nuage-libre.fr keepthepace@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
Joined: 2025-03-25
#8 · Quote Reply

All I know is it better have pockets because a dress without pockets is worthless

Let's be real, judging from the picture of the dress, I think they made the dress because it was impractical to do anything else than basically a poncho. I suspect there are strong limitations in terms of how you can arrange and sew things like pockets.

I see it more like a proof of concept for a new sort of textiles, not necessarily everyday clothes, but things like disposable hygienic clothes.

2
Post Reply
Back to top