| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » MeanwhileOnGrad |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
cm0002
literature.cafe
cm0002@literature.cafe Joined: 2025-11-08 |
Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input "lemmy.ml" and apply And consider donating to individual instances instead. Check the megathread for more! |
||
| 57 Original | |||
Infrapink
thebrainbin.org
Infrapink@thebrainbin.orgJoined: 2025-02-15 |
OK, "occupied Korea" is a new one. Who do they think is doing the occupying? |
||
| 16 | |||
HarkMahlberg
kbin.earth
HarkMahlberg@kbin.earthJoined: 2025-03-18 |
|
||
| 8 | |||
Eldritch
piefed.world
Eldritch@piefed.worldJoined: 2025-07-08 |
OK, "occupied Korea" is a new one. Who do they think is doing the occupying?
If you go to their safe spaces you'll see that and plenty more regularly. Though I recommended you don't, for sanity's sake. It's like maga with a different mask. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
mindbleach
sh.itjust.works
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-27 |
Like how "instance shaming" applies exclusively to the tankie triad. They are free to talk shit about you. |
||
| -5 | |||
|
hexagonwin
lemmy.today
hexagonwin@lemmy.today Joined: 2026-02-07 |
lol are they fucking stupid? highly doubt they know anything about korean conflict/division stuff other than kim jong un memes |
||
| 11 | |||
goat
sh.itjust.works
goat@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-13 |
It's funny how much south korea triggers them. |
||
| 6 | |||
|
unknownuserunknownlocation
kbin.earth
unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth Joined: 2025-08-01 |
OK, "occupied Korea" is a new one. Who do they think is doing the occupying?
According to them, the US occupies pretty much the entire West. Including countries that they're currently threatening to invade if they don't do as they will, but |
||
| 10 | |||
|
ddplf
szmer.info
ddplf@szmer.info Joined: 2024-08-08 |
Like how "instance shaming" applies exclusively to the tankie triad. They are free to talk shit about you.
Sure, let them, that doesn't matter at all. The point is to warn new users that there are tankies here on lemmy and that we're not okay with having them around. |
||
| 6 | |||
red_green_black
slrpnk.net
green_red_black@slrpnk.netJoined: 2025-06-19 |
Like how "instance shaming" applies exclusively to the tankie triad. They are free to talk shit about you.
[deleted]
|
||
| 4 | |||
|
mindbleach
sh.itjust.works
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-27 |
[deleted]
... and it's another example of how their rules are one-sided cudgels against the outgroup. Like this post. |
||
| -2 | |||
red_green_black
slrpnk.net
green_red_black@slrpnk.netJoined: 2025-06-19 |
... and it's another example of how their rules are one-sided cudgels against the outgroup. Like this post.
[deleted]
|
||
| 4 | |||
|
mindbleach
sh.itjust.works
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-27 |
[deleted]
I am describing something only they do. "Instance shaming" is how they describe any reference to e.g. .ML viciously censoring people for bullshit reasons. That kind of collectivist language is also extremely forbidden! ... exclusively for accurate criticism of mods and users on the tankie triad. Those users are 100% free to talk shit about your instance, in their communities or yours. |
||
| -3 | |||
red_green_black
slrpnk.net
green_red_black@slrpnk.netJoined: 2025-06-19 |
I am describing something only they do. "Instance shaming" is how they describe any reference to e.g. .ML viciously censoring people for bullshit reasons. That kind of collectivist language is also extremely forbidden! ... exclusively for accurate criticism of mods and users on the tankie triad. Those users are 100% free to talk shit about your instance, in their communities or yours.
[deleted]
|
||
| 2 | |||
|
mindbleach
sh.itjust.works
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-27 |
[deleted]
Who said it did? |
||
| 0 | |||
red_green_black
slrpnk.net
green_red_black@slrpnk.netJoined: 2025-06-19 |
Who said it did?
[deleted]
|
||
| 2 | |||
|
mindbleach
sh.itjust.works
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-27 |
[deleted]
How. Why did it take three explicit dry clarifications for you to re-examine that mistake? |
||
| -2 | |||
red_green_black
slrpnk.net
green_red_black@slrpnk.netJoined: 2025-06-19 |
How. Why did it take three explicit dry clarifications for you to re-examine that mistake?
[deleted]
|
||
| 1 | |||
|
mindbleach
sh.itjust.works
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-27 |
[deleted]
And the explanation it was about "their rules?" And the explanation it was about "something only they do?" I'm still getting downvoted for asking about the error you admit was on your end. There is something broken about reddit-style comment threads, where once someone has a negative number beside their name, people insist on the shittiest possible reading, no matter how thoroughly that's contradicted by follow-up comments. The words cease to matter. It's a terrible habit people need to break out of. |
||
| 0 | |||
red_green_black
slrpnk.net
green_red_black@slrpnk.netJoined: 2025-06-19 |
And the explanation it was about "their rules?" And the explanation it was about "something only they do?" I'm still getting downvoted for asking about the error you admit was on your end. There is something broken about reddit-style comment threads, where once someone has a negative number beside their name, people insist on the shittiest possible reading, no matter how thoroughly that's contr...
[deleted]
|
||
| 0 | |||
|
mindbleach
sh.itjust.works
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-27 |
[deleted]
To say what? None of this freeform hassling over complete phantasms ever has any good answer for why someone demanded explanations, ignored them, and continued giving me shit about a meaning of their own invention. When a follow-up makes crystal clear: the problem is them them them, and the response is still 'so the problem is us?!,' I am not convinced any sequence of words would be read for what they fucking say. Your options here include admitting you twisted two sentences beyond recognition, then treated every direct effort to politely address your bewildering questions like they were unjustified frothing vitriol. Nobody who pulls this shit ever takes that option. You admit it was a complete misunderstanding, you can see there's no basis for it, you can read the several times I tried steering you right, and you're still going to pretend this is a me problem. Not so much as an "Oops." Just "I guess." Yeah, you "guess" you repeatedly inferred the polar opposite of whatever I said. Why didn't I just say the opposite of the opposite of that? I don't want to be the kind of asshole who instantly escalates any confused response by asking 'who the fuck are you talking to?' But it's repeatedly proven simpler, more reliable, and safer than trying to deal with shit like this in gentle terms. Moderators have lurched out to slap me when someone acts aghast at every dry-as-a-bone explanation of how I meant... what I said... and the other guy... is just confused. Once you've jacketed all responses in a snot-nosed sarcastic tone of voice, what explanation would work? |
||
| 0 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |