RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
to those who are saying "new buyers are now better off than long term holders": it took me 5 years to finally get over XXXX because even at 10$, 15$, 20$... for some of us it is mighty expensive t...
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Lemmit.Online bot Bot bot@lemmit.online
Joined: 2023-06-18
Quote

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Superstonk by /u/bhj887 on 2026-08-19 06:13:57+00:00.

Original Title: to those who are saying "new buyers are now better off than long term holders": it took me 5 years to finally get over XXXX because even at 10$, 15$, 20$... for some of us it is mighty expensive to accumulate such a position


I'm hearing a lot of "but anyone who buys now will have it better than original buyers back in 2021" and so on...

back in these days I could maybe afford to buy at 5 share increments, today I bought my biggest position ever, 50 shares in one trade

all in all I made over 80 buys over the span of 5 years, avg at around 21$

so if you are a wageslave and only have zero to a few hundred bucks per month to spare it takes a loooong time to get to XXXX even if you heavily bought at the lowest prices

so lets say GME goes to 14$ - 19$ tomorrow, how many people have a spare 14-19k$ to throw at a stock and immediately get to XXXX just like that? in this economy probably not many...

time and pressure...

(not financial advice, just opinion/ speculation)

1   Original
Post Reply
Back to top