| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Android |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
jksalcedo
lemmy.ml
jksalcedo@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-07-02 |
Working on integrating Exodus Privacy data directly into LibreFind. Right now the app suggests FOSS alternatives, but soon it will also show you exactly which ad/analytics trackers and dangerous permissions are embedded inside the proprietary apps you're replacing. Still wiring it up, but test builds will be up on Codeberg soon. https://codeberg.org/jksalcedo/librefind #FOSS #Privacy #Android #LibreFind |
||
| 86 Original | |||
|
pulsewidth
lemmy.world
pulsewidth@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-01-29 |
Ironic. P.s. this is not a serious complaint. This is a neat app. |
||
| 14 | |||
beyoublahaj
lemmy.world
beyoublahaj@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-07-17 |
How hard would it be to make an app that reverse-searches app package names for their source code repo and looks for which liscence is used :think: |
||
| 4 | |||
Midnight Wolf
lemmy.world
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-08-23 |
However, there is no iron in here. Ironic... |
||
| 4 | |||
Shady_Shiroe
lemmy.world
Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-11 |
I got a very low score because 90% of the Foss apps are unknown or pending. Also interesting enough, I have an app on github and on play store and it marked it propietary despite code available and has GPLv3 license. This app still needs some work. |
||
| 7 | |||
chronicledmonocle
lemmy.world
chronicledmonocle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-24 |
There are a ton of apps that show up as "proprietary" that aren't. Firefox, Home Assistant, etc. are showing up as proprietary, but their source code is published and they have some form of non-proprietary license. It's not GPLv2 or v3, but giving it a red proprietary badge seems a bit much. |
||
| 19 | |||
|
mrdown
lemmy.world
mrdown@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-07-20 |
I clicked on multiple proprietary app, and none suggest me alternatives |
||
| 2 | |||
0xd34d
sh.itjust.works
0xd34d@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-21 |
How hard would it be to make an app that reverse-searches app package names for their source code repo and looks for which liscence is used :think:
Only as hard as it is to create the AI prompt to build it. |
||
| 2 | |||
0xd34d
sh.itjust.works
0xd34d@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-21 |
While the repo has a GPL license 🤔 |
||
| 1 | |||
JackbyDev
programming.dev
JackbyDev@programming.devJoined: 2023-06-13 |
There are a ton of apps that show up as "proprietary" that aren't. Firefox, Home Assistant, etc. are showing up as proprietary, but their source code is published and they have some form of non-proprietary license. It's not GPLv2 or v3, but giving it a red proprietary badge seems a bit much.
It's odd that it shows Brave as FOSS but not Firefox. Assuming it's not merely that nobody listed Firefox as FOSS yet and it's because Firefox's page says the "source code" is licensed under MPL but not the binary itself... Brave literally has this on the app.
My understanding was that all rights reserved meant specifically not foss. Like it's just the default copyright. But Brave lists itself as using MPL on another page. Which is ironic, because obviously Firefox uses MPL. I feel like this is just because nobody submitted Firefox as FOSS yet. |
||
| 1 | |||
chronicledmonocle
lemmy.world
chronicledmonocle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-24 |
It's odd that it shows Brave as FOSS but not Firefox. Assuming it's not merely that nobody listed Firefox as FOSS yet and it's because Firefox's page says the "source code" is licensed under MPL but not the binary itself... Brave literally has this on the app. My understanding was that all rights reserved meant specifically not foss. Like it's just the default copyright. But Brave lists itself ...
I'm pretty sure it's just the name "Firefox" that is copyright/trademarked, IIRC. |
||
| 1 | |||
JackbyDev
programming.dev
JackbyDev@programming.devJoined: 2023-06-13 |
I'm pretty sure it's just the name "Firefox" that is copyright/trademarked, IIRC.
Can't copyright a name, it's trademarked though. |
||
| 1 | |||
chronicledmonocle
lemmy.world
chronicledmonocle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-24 |
Can't copyright a name, it's trademarked though.
True |
||
| 1 | |||
|
jksalcedo
lemmy.ml
jksalcedo@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-07-02 |
I clicked on multiple proprietary app, and none suggest me alternatives
That means there's so approved/aubmitted alternatives for it. |
||
| 2 | |||
Martti
suppo.fi
martti@suppo.fiJoined: 2026-08-22 |
While the repo has a GPL license 🤔
It changed recently. As well as the misclassification error has occured only recently. |
||
| 2 | |||
Martti
suppo.fi
martti@suppo.fiJoined: 2026-08-22 |
Please note that latest release has classification error! Use pre-release or 1.0.9 |
||
| 2 | |||
|
jksalcedo
lemmy.ml
jksalcedo@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-07-02 |
There are a ton of apps that show up as "proprietary" that aren't. Firefox, Home Assistant, etc. are showing up as proprietary, but their source code is published and they have some form of non-proprietary license. It's not GPLv2 or v3, but giving it a red proprietary badge seems a bit much.
Hi. The latest release introduced some major bugs that affected the app scanning/detection. Please download the latest pre-release. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
jksalcedo
lemmy.ml
jksalcedo@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-07-02 |
I got a very low score because 90% of the Foss apps are unknown or pending. Also interesting enough, I have an app on github and on play store and it marked it propietary despite code available and has GPLv3 license. This app still needs some work.
Hi. The latest release introduced some major bugs that affected the app scanning/detection. Please download the latest pre-release. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
jksalcedo
lemmy.ml
jksalcedo@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-07-02 |
While the repo has a GPL license 🤔
We've just changed the project license. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |