| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » PumpkinDrama |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
♠️ Critical Nexus ✊🏿
reddthat.com
PumpkinDrama@reddthat.comJoined: 2023-09-23 |
The Statue of Lucifer the Light Bearer in New York City / Designed by Freemason Frédéric Bartholdi Tel Aviv Fashion Week has returned to the global spotlight with Baphomet symbolism displayed right in your face. The event opened with former hostages walking the runway, accompanied by a live opera chorus and showcases from some of Israel’s most renowned designers. Am I the only person that is still waiting on explanation for why the 300 Movie had a random scene of Baphomet in the film for no reason? |
||
| 0 Original | |||
♠️ Critical Nexus ✊🏿
Moderator
PumpkinDrama@reddthat.comJoined: 2023-09-23 |
The conspiracy theory claims that a scene (or ending) in which Bill and Alice Harford (Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman) give their young daughter Helena away to an elite “pedo cult” or for sacrifice was filmed or intended for Eyes Wide Shut (1999), then cut after Stanley Kubrick’s death, with Kubrick angrily opposing studio interference shortly beforehand. This is not supported by production records, scripts, or statements from key collaborators. It is a fringe interpretation that gained wider attention primarily through one high-profile mention and older fan theories about the toy-store ending. Core details of the claimIn the released film, the final scene takes place in a toy store (during the Christmas season). Bill and Alice talk while their daughter Helena wanders nearby; two older men (extras) are visible in the background in one brief moment as she moves away. Conspiracy versions interpret this as the parents knowingly or passively handing her over to the same shadowy elite group connected to the masked orgy/ritual at Somerton, framing it as a sacrifice or trafficking payoff for Bill’s intrusion. Some variants claim a longer sequence, voice-over narration, or explicit references to child exploitation/pedophilia were removed, sometimes linking it to 24 minutes of missing footage or Illuminati/elite cabal exposure. The “angry Kubrick” element usually involves a secondhand story of him yelling at Warner Bros. executives during an early screening in England (“It’s my movie, you can’t cut it”), followed by his death days later (he died of a heart attack on March 7, 1999, shortly after screening a cut for the studio and the stars). Who has mentioned it
Counter-evidence and official accountsCollaborators consistently state that the released cut is essentially Kubrick’s (with only limited post-death work). Editor Nigel Galt has said the cut Kubrick screened shortly before dying is the one released (“There was nothing missing… That cut is Stanley’s cut”), with only mundane fixes (e.g., establishing shots) and digital obscuring of explicit orgy action for the U.S. R rating (CGI figures added to block penetrative shots; European versions were uncensored in that regard). No frames depicting child sacrifice or similar were removed. Executive producer Jan Harlan (Kubrick’s brother-in-law) has denied studio deletion of substantive scenes. Kubrick’s widow Christiane and others noted only the rating-related digital work on the orgy. Nicole Kidman has affirmed it as Kubrick’s version. Production archives, early scripts, Frederic Raphael’s account of co-writing, and the source novella (Traumnovelle / Dream Story by Arthur Schnitzler) contain no such child-sacrifice material. Filming anything involving child actors in that context would have been logistically and legally extreme and is unsupported by evidence. Kubrick delivered a cut for screening; post-production finishing (music, sound, minor inserts, rating compliance) continued after his death under his team’s direction. He had contractual final cut, and the team avoided frame removals that would invite claims of alteration. Rumors of large missing sections (e.g., 24 minutes of elite-exposure footage) or assassination are longstanding urban legends without documentary support. In short, the theory rests mainly on Avary’s interpretation of the existing brief toy-store moment plus secondhand anecdotes, amplified by the film’s deliberate ambiguity, Kubrick’s sudden death, and real-world elite sex-crime scandals. Primary production sources reject the idea of a cut “sacrifice” scene or major studio excision of that content. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |